The Sustainable Process Index a new dimension in ecological evaluation

Abstract The Sustainable Process Index (SPI) is a measure developed to evaluate the viability of processes under sustainable economic conditions. Its advantages are its universal applicability, its scientific basis, the possibility of adoption in process analyses and syntheses, the high sensitivity for sustainable qualities, and the capability of aggregation to one measure. It has proved to be useful in industrial strategic planning. The concept of the SPI is based on the assumption that in a truly sustainable society the basis of economy is the sustainable flow of solar exergy. The conversion of the solar exergy to services needs area. Thus, area becomes the limiting factor of a sustainable economy. The SPI evaluates the areas needed to provide the raw materials and energy demands and to accommodate by-product flows from a process in a sustainable way. It relates these areas to the area available to a citizen in a given geographical (from regional to global) context. The data necessary to calculate the SPI are usually known at an early stage in process development. The result of the computation is the ratio between the area needed to supply a citizen with a given service and the area needed to supply a citizen with all possible services. Thus, it is a measure of the expense of this service in an economy oriented towards sustainability.

[1]  Richard Lowrance,et al.  Research approaches for ecological sustainability , 1990 .

[2]  D. Meadows,et al.  Beyond the Limits , 1992 .

[3]  Diana Liverman,et al.  Global sustainability: Toward definition , 1987 .

[4]  B. English.  Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability , 1991 .

[5]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Quantitative life cycle assessment of products 2. Classification, valuation and improvement analysis , 1993 .

[6]  D. Wolf-Gladrow.  Der Ozean als Teil des globalen Kohlenstoff-Kreislaufs , 1992 .

[7]  B. Linnhoff,et al.  The design of separators in the context of overall processes , 1988 .

[8]  K. E. Austmeyer,et al.  Energietr?ger aus nachwachsenden Rohstoffen , 1989 .

[9]  Onno Kuik,et al.  In search of indicators of sustainable development , 1991 .

[10]  Uno Svedin,et al.  The Challenge of the Societal Dimension to Environmental Issues: A Swedish Research Response , 1992 .

[11]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[12]  R. Turner,et al.  Sustainable Environmental Management: Principles And Practice , 1988 .

[13]  Tarzan Legović,et al.  The major biochemical cycles and their interactions: R. Bolin and R.B. Cook (Editors). SCOPE 21. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, Great Britain, 1983. xxi + 532 pp., £37.00. ISBN 0-471-10522-8 , 1984 .

[14]  Michael A. Toman,et al.  Economics and "Sustainability": Balancing Trade-offs and Imperatives , 1994 .

[15]  N. Kosaric,et al.  Fuel ethanol from biomass: production, economics and energy , 1981 .

[16]  John Holmberg,et al.  On Designing Socio-Ecological Indicators , 1992 .

[17]  R. Hueting,et al.  Correcting National Income for Environmental Losses: a practical solution for a theoretical dilemma , 1992 .