Implementing State Standards for Science Education: What District Policy Makers Make of the Hoopla.

Premised on the assumption that school districts play an important role in the implementa- tion of state and federal policy, this article explores the districts' response to state science standards. Adopt- ing a cognitive perspective on the implementation process, the authors examine the ideas about science education that district policy makers construct from science standards. Our analysis illuminates how the ideas about reforming science education that district policy makers come to understand from new science standards contribute to these standards being adapted at the district level in ways that miss or misrepre- sent their core intent. The article identifies prominent patterns in district policy makers' understandings of the science reforms. Based on this analysis, the authors argue that a cause of implementation failure, rarely examined in the literature, concerns the ways in which local implementers miss or misconstrue the intent of policy proposals. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach: 37: 401-425, 2000.

[1]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[2]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[3]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[4]  Dvora Yanow,et al.  How Does A Policy Mean?: Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions , 1997 .

[5]  James P. Spillane.  Cognition and Policy Implementation: District Policymakers and the Reform of Mathematics Education , 2000 .

[6]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[7]  James P. Spillane.  State Policy and the Non-Monolithic Nature of the Local School District: Organizational and Professional Considerations , 1998 .

[8]  M. Mclaughlin.  Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation , 1987 .

[9]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Mental Models in Data Interpretation , 1996, Philosophy of Science.

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[11]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[12]  Iris Tabak.  Unraveling the development of scientific literacy: Domain-specific inquiry support in a system of cognitive and social interactions , 1999 .

[13]  M. Mclaughlin.  The Rand Change Agent Study Revisited: Macro Perspectives and Micro Realities , 1990 .

[14]  J. Little.  Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform , 1993 .

[15]  J. Confrey.  A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming , 1990 .

[16]  James P. Spillane.  School Districts Matter: Local Educational Authorities and State Instructional Policy , 1996 .

[17]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Reconstructing Conceptions of Local Capacity: The Local Education Agency’s Capacity for Ambitious Instructional Reform , 1997 .

[18]  D. Yates,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1981, Michigan Law Review.

[19]  The Science Reforms: Mapping the Progress of Reform and Multiple Contexts of Influence. , 1997 .

[20]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[21]  Paul Berman,et al.  Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation. , 1977 .

[22]  James P. Spillane.  State and Local Government Relations in the Era of Standards-Based Reform: Standards, State Policy Instruments, and Local Instructional Policy Making , 1999 .

[23]  John Brehm,et al.  Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public , 1997 .

[24]  Brian J. Reiser.  BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms: Twenty-five years of progress , 2001 .

[25]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[26]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 1989, IJCAI 1989.

[27]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Complementary roles of software-based scaffolding and teacher-student interactions in inquiry learning , 1997, CSCL.

[28]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  ANALOGICAL REMINDING: A GOOD MATCH IS HARD TO FIND. , 1985 .

[29]  James P. Spillane.  A Cognitive Perspective on the Role of the Local Educational Agency in Implementing Instructional Policy: Accounting for Local Variability , 1998 .

[30]  Deborah C. Smith,et al.  The Construction of Subject Matter Knowledge in Primary Science Teaching. , 1989 .

[31]  M. Franke,et al.  Teachers' Shifting Assessment Practices in the Context of Educational Reform in Mathematics. , 1999 .