Assistive Technology Use by Students With LD in Postsecondary Education

An increasing number of students with Learning Disabilities (LD) are enrolling in postsecondary education (PSE). Assistive technology (AT) is often provided to these students to circumvent academic deficits. This article will focus on research at the PSE level and students with LD to (a) identify AT service delivery practices, (b) describe the most frequently used ATs, (c) review research on the efficacy of AT to circumvent academic deficits, and (d) provide suggestions for future research on AT efficacy and for formulation of recommendations within psychoeducational reports. The use of AT by PSE students with LD appears to have moved ahead of research, proving or even testing the effectiveness of ATs in supporting the learning needs of this population.

[1]  Lynne Anderson-Inman,et al.  ISSUES IN TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER-BASED SOLUTIONS FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: EMERGING ISSUES , 1999 .

[2]  Henry B. Reiff,et al.  Learning Disabilities in Adulthood: Persisting Problems and Evolving Issues , 1994 .

[3]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability , 1986 .

[4]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[5]  C. Sinclair Nine unique features of the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists. , 1998 .

[6]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  Effects of Speech Synthesis on the Proofreading Efficiency of Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1995 .

[7]  Joy Smiley Zabala,et al.  Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services in School Settings , 2000 .

[8]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  Assistive Technology for Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1998, Journal of learning disabilities.

[9]  C. Fichten,et al.  Commentary: Computer technologies and postsecondary students with disabilities: Implications of recent research for rehabilitation psychologists. , 2003 .

[10]  Cynthia M. Okolo,et al.  Technology and Individual Differences , 1994 .

[11]  Charlotte A. Mull,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Transition to Postsecondary Education of Students with Learning Disabilities , 2003 .

[12]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  A Synthesis of Spelling and Reading Interventions and Their Effects on the Spelling Outcomes of Students With LD , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  The Compensatory Effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the Reading Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities , 2004 .

[14]  David Hubka,et al.  Working towards a Coordinated National Approach to Services, Accommodations and Policies for Post-Secondary Students with Disabilities: Ensuring Access to Higher Education and Career Training. , 1999 .

[15]  D. Hammill,et al.  A New Definition of Learning Disabilities , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.

[16]  David R. Parker,et al.  Leveling the Digital Playing Field , 2007 .

[17]  Bonnie Todis,et al.  Tools for the Task? Perspectives on Assistive Technology in Educational Settings , 1996 .

[18]  Terence Collins,et al.  The impact of microcomputer word processing on the performance of learning disabled students in a required first-year writing course , 1990 .

[19]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  The Compensatory Effectiveness of Optical Character Recognition/Speech Synthesis on Reading Comprehension of Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1997 .

[20]  Max Ito,et al.  Effect of assistive technology in a public school setting. , 2010, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[21]  Carla Abreu-Ellis,et al.  The Challenge of Accommodation in Higher Education: A Survey of Adaptive Technology Use in Ontario Universities , 2006 .

[22]  S. Reder,et al.  Learning Disabilities, Literacy, and Adult Education. , 1998 .

[23]  Kelly D. Roberts,et al.  An analysis of assistive technology supports and services offered in postsecondary educational institutions , 2006 .

[24]  T. M. Eberlee,et al.  The Ontario Human Rights Code , 1964 .

[25]  Robert A. Stodden,et al.  Findings from the Study of Transition, Technology and Postsecondary Supports for Youth with Disabilities: Implications for Secondary School Educators , 2003 .

[26]  Alexa Murray,et al.  An analysis of instructional accommodations and assistive technologies used by postsecondary graduates with disabilities , 2005 .

[27]  D. Carson,et al.  Standards of professional conduct , 1989 .

[28]  Isandra Martinez-Marrero,et al.  Assistive Technology: An Instructional Tool to Assist College Students with Written Language Disabilities , 2008 .

[29]  S L Day,et al.  Assistive Technology For Postsecondary Students With Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[30]  Norman Coombs,et al.  Information Access and Adaptive Technology , 1997 .

[31]  C. Wissick,et al.  Conducting Assessments in Technology Needs , 2008 .

[32]  José Miguel Baptista Nunes,et al.  Text-based synchronous e-learning and dyslexia: Not necessarily the perfect match! , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[33]  P. Wehman The ADA mandate for social change , 1993 .

[34]  Roger O. Smith Measuring Assistive Technology Outcomes in Education , 2000 .

[35]  Maxwell Cohen The Canadian charter of rights and freedoms , 1983 .

[36]  C. Brunswick,et al.  Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms , 1989 .

[37]  J Elkind,et al.  Computer-based compensation of adult reading disabilities , 1996, Annals of dyslexia.