Testing attribute selection and variation in a choice experiment to assess the tradeoffs associated with increased mining development

Abstract Evaluating land use change in economic frameworks often requires non-market values to be assessed. However non-market valuation experiments can be sensitive to the way the tradeoffs are framed. The aim of the research reported in this paper was to examine the influence of varying the valuation scope and combination of attributes in a split sample choice experiment focused on assessing the impacts of increased mining activity (coal and coal seam gas) in the Surat Basin in southern Queensland, Australia. The region had traditionally been dominated by the agricultural sector. The survey was designed to assess the largely, but not exclusively, non-use values of a distant population (Brisbane (capital city) residents) for tradeoffs between positive and negative impacts, which incorporated economic, social and environmental issues. Four impact attributes were identified: (A) local jobs in the mining sector; (B) house prices in the non-mining sector; (C) wage rates in the non-mining sector, and (D) inspections and independent monitoring activity at coal seam gas mining sites (a proxy to address environmental concerns). The results indicate that varying the combination of attributes had a significant influence on preferences and welfare estimates, which varied across attributes and valuation formats.

[1]  Jette Bredahl Jacobsen,et al.  What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’ species when valuing biodiversity , 2008 .

[2]  John Rolfe,et al.  The Economic Contribution of the Resources Sector by Regional Areas in Queensland , 2011 .

[3]  D. Hensher.  How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load , 2006 .

[4]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Designing Policy for Reducing the Off-farm Effects of Soil Erosion Using Choice Experiments , 2005 .

[5]  R. Dhar.  Context and Task Effects on Choice Deferral , 1997 .

[6]  Björn Olsson,et al.  Valuing multi-attribute marine water quality , 2009 .

[7]  T. Measham,et al.  Mining Activity, Income Inequality and Gender in Regional Australia , 2012 .

[8]  John Rolfe,et al.  The impact of offering two versus three alternatives in choice modelling experiments , 2009 .

[9]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Valuing New South Wales Rivers for Use in Benefit Transfer , 2004 .

[10]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling , 2002 .

[11]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[12]  J. Bennett,et al.  Towards the Development of a Transferable Set of Value Estimates for Environmental Attributes , 2004 .

[13]  J. Bennett,et al.  Estimating Society's Willingness to Pay to Maintain Viable Rural Communities , 2004 .

[14]  John Rolfe,et al.  Lessons from the Social and Economic Impacts of the Mining Boom in the Bowen Basin 2004-2006 , 2007 .

[15]  A. Juutinen,et al.  Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application , 2011 .

[16]  J. Rolfe,et al.  Restricted versus unrestricted choice in labelled choice experiments: exploring the tradeoffs of expanding choice dimensions , 2012 .

[17]  Richard T. Yao,et al.  Non-timber values from planted forests: recreation in Whakarewarewa forest. , 2011 .

[18]  Ben White,et al.  Public preferences for timeliness and quality of mine site rehabilitation. The case of bauxite mining in Western Australia , 2012 .

[19]  Fiona Solomon,et al.  Social dimensions of mining: Research, policy and practice challenges for the minerals industry in Australia , 2008 .

[20]  John Rolfe,et al.  Assessing development options in mining communities using stated preference techniques , 2011 .

[21]  R. Cullen,et al.  Public preferences in irrigation and conservation development projects: Does simultaneous consideration of substitutes in choice sets matter? , 2013 .

[22]  A. Kosenius,et al.  Heterogeneous preferences for water quality attributes: The Case of eutrophication in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea , 2010 .

[23]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions , 2005 .

[24]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation , 2000 .

[25]  S. Hajkowicz,et al.  The relationship between mining and socio-economic well being in Australia's regions , 2011 .

[26]  Jan Staes,et al.  Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium. , 2013 .

[27]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Enhancing the Content Validity of Stated Preference Valuation: The Structure and Function of Ecological Indicators , 2012, Land Economics.

[28]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[29]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Serial Nonparticipation in Repeated Discrete Choice Models , 2005 .

[30]  John Rolfe,et al.  Assessing the Trade‐Offs of Increased Mining Activity in the Surat Basin, Queensland: Preferences of Brisbane Residents Using Nonmarket Valuation Techniques , 2014 .

[31]  D. Hensher,et al.  Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates , 2005 .

[32]  M. Kragt,et al.  Accounting for Nonmarket Impacts in a Benefit-Cost Analysis of Underground Coal Mining in New South Wales, Australia , 2012, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.

[33]  Thomas G. Measham,et al.  Local Economic Impacts of an Unconventional Energy Boom: The Coal Seam Gas Industry in Australia , 2015 .

[34]  P. Boxall,et al.  Complexity in Choice Experiments: Choice of the Status Quo Alternative and Implications for Welfare Measurement , 2009 .

[35]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Monitoring Choice Task Attribute Attendance in Nonmarket Valuation of Multiple Park Management Services: Does It Matter? , 2010, Land Economics.

[36]  John Rolfe,et al.  Mining Developments and Social Impacts on Communities: Bowen Basin Case Studies , 2009 .

[37]  J. Rolfe,et al.  Rural Communities in Transition and Sustainable Regional Development , 2013 .

[38]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Balancing Ecology and Community using Cumulative Effects Models Cumulative Effects Planning: Finding the Balance Using Choice Experiments , 2012 .

[39]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Scale and taste heterogeneity for forest biodiversity: Models of serial nonparticipation and their effects , 2012 .

[40]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  Range and Number-of-Levels Effects in Derived and Stated Measures of Attribute Importance , 2002 .

[41]  J. R. DeShazo,et al.  Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency , 2002 .

[42]  R. Johnston,et al.  What to Value and How? Ecological Indicator Choices in Stated Preference Valuation , 2013 .

[43]  J. Rolfe.  Predicting the economic and demographic impacts of long distance commuting in the resources sector: A Surat basin case study , 2013 .

[44]  Review of the Australian Economy 2008–09: Recessions, Retrenchments and Risks , 2009 .

[45]  Toni Darbas,et al.  Surat Basin scoping study. Enhancing regional and community capacity for mining and energy driven regional economic development. Report to the Southern Inland Queensland Area Consultative Committee , 2008 .