Learning as boundary-crossing in school–university partnership ☆

Abstract This paper points out that globalization has raised fundamental questions about knowing and learning and that it is essential for educators to engage in collective knowledge generation by crossing community boundaries. Drawing on the theoretical framework of Activity Theory, this paper reports on a study on the expansive learning that was afforded by a school–university partnership as university tutors, mentor teachers and student teachers engaged in a new activity system mediated by lesson study. The study showed that in the course of resolving contradictions that were inherent in the boundary zone, they negotiated the mediating tool and consequently, the activity system was transformed from helping student teachers learn to teach into learning for all participants. This paper concludes that it is essential for teachers and teacher educators to develop the capability to engage in expansive learning through tackling ill-defined problems in boundary zones.

[1]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[2]  Y. Engeström.  Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[3]  Patsy Wang-Iverson,et al.  Building our understanding of lesson study , 2005 .

[4]  Makoto Yoshida,et al.  Lesson study : a case study of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development , 1999 .

[5]  Ference Marton,et al.  Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning , 2004 .

[6]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[7]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[9]  J. Wertsch.  The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[10]  Amy B. M. Tsui.  Understanding expertise in teaching , 2003 .

[11]  B. Lomov.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1982 .

[12]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing , 2003 .

[13]  N. Minick,et al.  Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Children's Development , 1993 .

[14]  C. Lewis.  Does Lesson Study Have a Future in the United States , 2004 .

[15]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[16]  M. Albrow,et al.  Globalization, Knowledge and Society. , 1994 .

[17]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Peter Drucker on the Profession of Management , 1998 .

[18]  Clea Fernandez,et al.  Lesson Study: A Japanese Approach To Improving Mathematics Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[19]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Redesigning an "Urban" Teacher Education Program: An Activity Theory Perspective , 2002 .

[20]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[21]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[22]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Polycontextuality and Boundary Crossing in Expert Cognition: Learning and Problem Solving in Complex Work Activities. , 1995 .

[23]  M. Linn,et al.  Beyond Fourth-Grade Science: Why Do U.S. and Japanese Students Diverge? , 2000 .

[24]  A. Giddens.  Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives , 1999 .

[25]  S. Feldman.  The Teaching Gap. , 2004 .

[26]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[27]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space , 1999 .

[28]  M. Cole,et al.  Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations , 1976 .

[29]  Michael Young,et al.  From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction , 2003 .