Object-Based Visual Selection: Evidence From Perceptual Completion

A large body of evidence suggests that visual attention selects objects as well as spatial locations. If attention is to be regarded as truly object based, then it should operate not only on object representations that are explicit in the image, but also on representations that are the result of earlier perceptual completion processes. Reporting the results of two experiments, we show that when attention is directed to part of a perceptual object, other parts of that object enjoy an attentional advantage as well. In particular, we show that this object-specific attentional advantage accrues to partly occluded objects and to objects defined by subjective contours. The results corroborate the claim that perceptual completion precedes object-based attentional selection.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[2]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location , 2014 .

[3]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[5]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[6]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[11]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  S. Yantis.  Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  C M Moore,et al.  Looking for two targets at the same time: One search or two? , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994 .

[19]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception , 1994 .

[21]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. , 1994 .

[22]  S. Yantis.  Perceived Continuity of Occluded Visual Objects , 1995 .

[23]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[24]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  14. Object-based visual selection and the principle of uniform conneectedness , 1996 .

[25]  J. Duncan,et al.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Jon Driver,et al.  Spreading of Visual Attention to Modally Versus Amodally Completed Regions , 1997 .

[28]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Seeing Two as One: Linking Apparent Motion and Repetition Blindness , 1997 .

[29]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  R. Zemel,et al.  Object-Based Attention and Occlusion Evidence From Normal Participants and a Computational Model , 1998 .

[31]  Jon Driver,et al.  Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search , 1998 .

[32]  Zhe Chen.  Switching attention within and between objects : The role of subjective organization , 1998 .