Mechanistic models must link the field and the lab

In the theory outlined in the target article, an animal forages continuously, making sequential decisions in a world where the amount of food and its uncertainty are fixed, but delays are variable. These assumptions contrast with the risk-sensitive foraging theory and create a problem for comparing the predictions of this model with many laboratory experiments that do not make these assumptions.

[1]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Flying in the face of nature , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[2]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  The value of food: effects of open and closed economies , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Triumphs and trials of the risk paradigm , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  A I Houston,et al.  Risk-sensitive foraging theory and operant psychology. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  A. Houston,et al.  Risk attitudes in a changing environment: An evolutionary model of the fourfold pattern of risk preferences. , 2015, Psychological review.

[6]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Risky Theories—The Effects of Variance on Foraging Decisions , 1996 .

[7]  Pete C. Trimmer,et al.  The evolution of decision rules in complex environments , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Nicky J Welton,et al.  Acquisition and maintenance costs in the long-term regulation of avian fat reserves , 1997 .

[9]  A. Houston,et al.  Dynamic models of mass-dependent predation risk-sensitive foraging and premigratory fattening in birds , 1994 .

[10]  Pete C. Trimmer,et al.  Generalized Optimal Risk Allocation: Foraging and Antipredator Behavior in a Fluctuating Environment , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[11]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Starlings’ preferences for predictable and unpredictable delays to food , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Vladimir Orduña,et al.  Energy budget versus temporal discounting as determinants of preference in risky choice , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Energy budgets and risk-sensitive foraging in starlings , 1999 .

[14]  A. Houston,et al.  The choice of two prey types that minimises the probability of starvation , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  D. Stephens.  The logic of risk-sensitive foraging preferences , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  J. McNamara,et al.  Risk-Prone Behaviour Under Rules Which Have Evolved in a Changing Environment , 1996 .