A review of continuous soil gas monitoring related to CCS - Technical advances and lessons learned

Abstract One of the most vigorously discussed issues related to Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in the public and scientific community is the development of adequate monitoring strategies. Geological monitoring is mostly related to large scale migration of the injected CO 2 in the storage formations. However, public interest (or fear as that) is more related to massive CO 2 discharge at the surface and possible affects on human health and the environment. Public acceptance of CO 2 sequestration will only be achieved if secure and comprehensible monitoring methods for the natural habitat exist. For this reason the compulsory directive 2009/31/EG of the European Union as well as other international regulations demand a monitoring strategy for CO 2 at the surface. The variation of CO 2 emissions of different soil types and vegetation is extremely large. Hence, reliable statements on actual CO 2 emissions can only be made using continuous long-term gas-concentration measurements. Here the lessons learned from the (to the authors’ knowledge) first world-wide continuous gas concentration monitoring program applied on a selected site in the Altmark area (Germany), are described. This paper focuses on the authors’ technical experiences and recommendations for further extensive monitoring programs related to CCS. Although many of the individual statements and suggestions have been addressed in the literature, a comprehensive overview is presented of the main technical and scientific issues. The most important topics are the reliability of the single stations as well as range of the measured parameters. Each selected site needs a thorough pre-investigation with respect to the depth of the biologically active zone and potential free water level. For the site installation and interface the application of small drill holes is recommended for quantifying the soil gas by means of a closed circuit design. This configuration allows for the effective drying of the soil gas and avoids pressure disturbance in the soil gas. Standard soil parameters (humidity, temperature) as well as local weather data are crucial for site specific interpretation of the data. The complexity, time and effort to handle a dozen (or even more) single stations in a large case study should not be underestimated. Management and control of data, automatic data handling and presentation must be considered right from the beginning of the monitoring. Quality control is a pre-condition for reproducible measurements, correct interpretation and subsequently for public acceptance. From the experience with the recent monitoring program it is strongly recommended that baseline measurements should start at least 3 a before any gas injection to the reservoir.

[1]  Fedora Quattrocchi,et al.  Gas geochemistry of natural analogues for the studies of geological CO2 sequestration , 2009 .

[2]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  The role of optimality in characterizing CO2 seepage from geological carbon sequestration sites , 2007 .

[3]  U. Schuster,et al.  Sensors and instruments for oceanic dissolved carbon measurements , 2009 .

[4]  Teresa Ferreira,et al.  Monitoring of fumarole discharge and CO2 soil degassing in the Azores: contribution to volcanic surveillance and public health risk assessment , 2005 .

[5]  D. Connelly,et al.  Sensors and technologies for in situ dissolved methane measurements and their evaluation using Technology Readiness Levels , 2010 .

[6]  S. Lafortune,et al.  Noble gases as tools for subsurface monitoring of CO2 leakage , 2009 .

[7]  R. Bowden,et al.  Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes by a forest soil under laboratory-controlled moisture and temperature conditions , 1998 .

[8]  E. Faber,et al.  Continuous gas monitoring at Galeras Volcano, Colombia: first evidence , 2003 .

[9]  D. Ghosh,et al.  Anomalous radon emission as precursor of earthquake , 2009 .

[10]  C. Bernardo,et al.  Permanent shallow subsoil CO2 flux chambers for monitoring of onshore CO2 geological storage sites , 2011 .

[11]  Grant S. Bromhal,et al.  The use of tracers to assess leakage from the sequestration of CO2 in a depleted oil reservoir, New Mexico, USA , 2007 .

[12]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Near-surface monitoring strategies for geologic carbon dioxide storage verification , 2003 .

[13]  D. Rouwet,et al.  CO2 and He degassing at El Chichón volcano, Chiapas, Mexico: gas flux, origin and relationship with local and regional tectonics , 2011 .

[14]  Clifford K. Ho,et al.  Overview of Sensors and Needs for Environmental Monitoring , 2005, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).

[15]  Yue Hao,et al.  Geochemical detection of carbon dioxide in dilute aquifers , 2009, Geochemical transactions.

[16]  Gerhard Lange,et al.  Geophysics / Geodesy: Handbuch zur Erkundung des Untergrundes von Deponien und Altlasten , 1999 .

[17]  I. Florinsky,et al.  Topographic control of soil microbial activity: a case study of denitrifiers , 2004 .

[18]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  From Field‐ to Landscape‐Scale Vadose Zone Processes: Scale Issues, Modeling, and Monitoring , 2006 .

[19]  Dontireddy Venkat Reddy,et al.  Groundwater electrical conductivity and soil radon gas monitoring for earthquake precursory studies in Koyna, India , 2011 .

[20]  Ralf D. Prien,et al.  The future of chemical in situ sensors , 2007 .

[21]  P. Rao,et al.  Gas Transport of Volatile Organic Compounds in Unsaturated Soils , 2005 .

[22]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Detection of CO2 leakage by eddy covariance during the ZERT project’s CO2 release experiments , 2009 .

[23]  M. Schlüter,et al.  Application of membrane inlet mass spectrometry for online and in situ analysis of methane in aquatic environments , 2008, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[24]  Jiuping Xu,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Control , 2014 .

[25]  John Moncrieff,et al.  The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature , 2001 .

[26]  Susan D. Hovorka,et al.  The U-Tube: A Novel System for Acquiring Borehole Fluid Samples from a Deep Geologic CO2 Sequestration Experiment , 2005 .

[27]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  An improved strategy to detect CO2 leakage for verification of geologic carbon sequestration , 2005 .

[28]  D. Cooper,et al.  Influence of water table levels on CO2 emissions in a Colorado subalpine fen: an in situ microcosm study , 2003 .

[29]  Salvatore Lombardi,et al.  D20 Report : Soil Gas surveys in the Weyburn oil field (2001-2003) , 2004 .

[30]  E. Faber,et al.  Seismically induced variations in Mariánské Lázně fault gas composition in the NW Bohemian swarm quake region, Czech Republic — A continuous gas monitoring , 2006 .

[31]  W. Otten,et al.  Method to quantify short-term dynamics in carbon dioxide emission following controlled soil deformation. , 2000 .

[32]  Anna Korre,et al.  Quantification techniques for potential CO2 leakage from geological storage sites , 2011 .

[33]  G. Chiodini,et al.  Non‐volcanic CO2 Earth degassing: Case of Mefite d'Ansanto (southern Apennines), Italy , 2010 .

[34]  J. Holt,et al.  Regional scale impacts of distinct CO(2) additions in the North Sea. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[35]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Atmospheric monitoring and verification technologies for CO2 geosequestration , 2008 .

[36]  E. Faber,et al.  Continuous gas monitoring in the West Bohemian earthquake area, Czech Republic: First results , 2009 .

[37]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and its effects on ecosystem carbon budget: nonlinearity begets surprises , 2002 .

[38]  E. Faber,et al.  Continuous, Direct Gas-Geochemical Monitoring in Hydrothermal Vents: Installation and Long-Term Operation on Nisyros Island (Greece) , 2007 .

[39]  M. Schubert,et al.  Using the soil gas radon as an indicator for ground contamination by non-aqueous phase-liquids , 2001 .

[40]  S. Lombardi,et al.  Rn, He and CO2 soil gas geochemistry for the study of active and inactive faults , 2010 .

[41]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Emission factors and their uncertainty for the exchange of CO2, CH4 and N2O in Finnish managed peatlands , 2007 .

[42]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Surface Environmental Monitoring At the Frio CO 2 Sequestration Test Site, Texas , 2005 .

[43]  K. Wen,et al.  Nitrogen as the carrier gas for helium emission along an active fault in NW Taiwan , 2010 .

[44]  K. Wen,et al.  Soil–gas monitoring: A tool for fault delineation studies along Hsinhua Fault (Tainan), Southern Taiwan , 2010 .

[45]  Nihat Adar,et al.  Monitoring of earthquake precursors by multi-parameter stations in Eskisehir region (Turkey) , 2010 .

[46]  Elizabeth J Wilson,et al.  Environmental bonds and the challenge of long-term carbon sequestration. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  L. Barfield,et al.  International standards , 2001 .

[48]  T. T. Wong,et al.  Development of a technically defensible soil gas sampling strategy for vapour intrusion assessments , 2009 .