Ultrasonographic evaluation of endotracheal tube position in newborns with CHD.

Many studies have been conducted to determine the most reliable technique for evaluating the position of the endotracheal tube in patients receiving mechanical ventilation support. In this study, we aimed to determine the endotracheal tube position by ultrasonography in intubated patients with a diagnosis of critical CHD followed in the neonatal ICU. METHODS In this prospective observational clinical study, we performed point-of-care ultrasound for endotracheal tube localisation in 65 intubated newborns with critical CHD. After routine radiography, each patient underwent point-of-care ultrasound examination with a portable ultrasonography device for endotracheal tube end-carina measurement. Endotracheal tube end-carina measurements on chest radiographs were compared with ultrasound images. RESULTS The mean gestational age and birth weight were 37.8 ± 2.19 weeks and 2888 ± 595 g, respectively. Ultrasound images were obtained after an average of 2.08 ± 1.6 hours from the radiographs. The average ultrasound time allocated to each patient was 5 minutes. The mean endotracheal tube tip-to-carina distance on chest X-ray and ultrasound were optimally 1.33 ± 0.64 cm and 1.43 ± 0.67 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference between chest X-ray and ultrasound measurements in endotracheal tube end-carina distance values evaluated by the Bland-Altman method (mean difference 0.10 cm, p = 0.068). There was a linear correlation between the endotracheal tube tip-carina distance in ultrasound and radiography evaluation (r2 = 0.60, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION It has been concluded that critical CHDs are frequently accompanied by vascular anomalies, and the endotracheal tube tip-carina distance measurement can be used by determining the carina section as a guide point in the ultrasonographic evaluation of the endotracheal tube location in this patient population.

[1]  B. Weinberger,et al.  Determination of optimal endotracheal tube tip depth from the gum in neonates by X-ray and ultrasound , 2020, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[2]  R. Kirby,et al.  National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014. , 2019, Birth defects research.

[3]  J. Nguyen,et al.  Ultrasonography for endotracheal tube position in infants and children , 2017, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[4]  P. Pishdad,et al.  Ultrasonographic confirmation of endotracheal tube position in neonates , 2016, Indian Pediatrics.

[5]  M. Horrow,et al.  Sonography for Complete Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Central Support Devices , 2016, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[6]  R. Chowdhry,et al.  The concordance of ultrasound technique versus X-ray to confirm endotracheal tube position in neonates , 2015, Journal of Perinatology.

[7]  A. Nimbalkar,et al.  Point of care ultrasonography for position of tip of endotracheal tube in neonates , 2014, Indian Pediatrics.

[8]  N. Finer,et al.  Ultrasound Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Position in Neonates , 2012, Neonatology.

[9]  A. Sargsyan,et al.  International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound , 2012, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  Gabriele Benz-Bohm,et al.  Radiation protection in pediatric radiology. , 2011, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[11]  T. Slovis,et al.  Endotracheal tubes in neonates: sonographic positioning. , 1986, Radiology.

[12]  S. Thayyil,et al.  Optimal endotracheal tube tip position in extremely premature infants. , 2008, American journal of perinatology.

[13]  Kimberlee Gauvreau,et al.  Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.