Clinical Impact of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cancer Patients With Suspected Cardiomyopathy

Objectives: To assess the clinical impact of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) in clinical decision making of cancer patients with a suspected cardiomyopathy in a tertiary cancer center. Background: Cardiomyopathies of diverse etiologies are frequently encountered in a Cardio-Oncology practice. The clinical impact of CMR after a presumptive diagnosis of cardiomyopathy has not been studied in cancer patients. Methods: We reviewed data on cancer patients with presumptive diagnosis of cardiomyopathy who underwent CMR in a tertiary cancer center. The clinical impact of CMR was defined as either change in clinical diagnosis or management post CMR results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess whether any of the baseline characteristics were predictive of the clinical impact of CMR. Results: A total of 110 consecutive patients were identified. Clinical impact of CMR was seen in 68 (62%) patients. Change in the clinical diagnosis and management was seen in 56 (51%) and 41 (37%) of patients, respectively. The most common change was prevention of endomyocardial biopsy in 26 patients (24%). Overall, patients with higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography (echo), clinical impact was influenced more by CMR (LVEF of 37.2 ± 12.3% vs. 51.5 ± 11.6%, p < 0.001). Cancer diagnosis of multiple myeloma was associated with change in the management post CMR (adjusted OR of 25.6, 95% CI 4.0–162.4, p = 0.001). Suspicion of infiltrative cardiomyopathy was associated with a higher likelihood of change in diagnosis. Having an LVEF≥40 by echo was associated with change in diagnosis and management by CMR. Conclusions: Utilization of CMR has a significant clinical impact in cancer patients with suspected cardiomyopathy. Patients with cancer diagnosis of multiple myeloma, suspicion of infiltrative cardiomyopathy and those with higher LVEF by echo seem to benefit more from CMR.

[1]  B. Chow,et al.  OUTSMART HF , 2020, Circulation.

[2]  Sanjiv J. Shah,et al.  ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2—evidence base and standardized methods of imaging , 2019, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[3]  Sanjiv J. Shah,et al.  ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI EXPERT CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MULTIMODALITY IMAGING IN CARDIAC AMYLOIDOSIS: PART 1 OF 2-EVIDENCE BASE AND STANDARDIZED METHODS OF IMAGING. , 2019, Journal of cardiac failure.

[4]  Michael E. Hall,et al.  ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic , 2019, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  R. D. de Boer,et al.  Common risk factors for heart failure and cancer , 2019, Cardiovascular research.

[6]  W. Hundley,et al.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in the Oncology Patient , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  A. Bhimaraj,et al.  Incidence and outcomes of cancer treatment-related cardiomyopathy among referrals for advanced heart failure , 2018, Cardio-Oncology.

[8]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  C. Criscitiello,et al.  Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: Epidemiology, detection, and management , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  C. Kramer Role of Cardiac MR Imaging in Cardiomyopathies , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  R. Kwong,et al.  Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on management and clinical decision-making in heart failure patients , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[12]  Michael Salerno,et al.  Advances in parametric mapping with CMR imaging. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  E. Nagel,et al.  European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry - multi national tesults from 57 centers in 15 countries , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  Incidence of heart failure or cardiomyopathy after adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[16]  Raymond J Kim,et al.  Technology Insight: MRI of the myocardium , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[17]  D J Pennell,et al.  Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.