Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope

Electronic stethoscopes offer several advantages over conventional acoustic stethoscopes, including noise reduction, increased amplification, and ability to store and transmit sounds. However, the acoustical characteristics of electronic and acoustic stethoscopes can differ significantly, introducing a barrier for clinicians to transition to electronic stethoscopes. This work proposes a method to process lung sounds recorded by an electronic stethoscope, such that the sounds are perceived to have been captured by an acoustic stethoscope. The proposed method calculates an electronic-to-acoustic stethoscope filter by measuring the difference between the average frequency responses of an acoustic and an electronic stethoscope to multiple lung sounds. To validate the method, a change detection experiment was conducted with 51 medical professionals to compare filtered electronic, unfiltered electronic, and acoustic stethoscope lung sounds. Participants were asked to detect when transitions occurred in sounds comprising several sections of the three types of recordings. Transitions between the filtered electronic and acoustic stethoscope sections were detected, on average, by chance (sensitivity index equal to zero) and also detected significantly less than transitions between the unfiltered electronic and acoustic stethoscope sections (p < 0.01), demonstrating the effectiveness of the method to filter electronic stethoscopes to mimic an acoustic stethoscope. This processing could incentivize clinicians to adopt electronic stethoscopes by providing a means to shift between the sound characteristics of acoustic and electronic stethoscopes in a single device, allowing for a faster transition to new technology and greater appreciation for the electronic sound quality.

[1]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[2]  E. E. van der Wall The stethoscope: celebration or cremation after 200 years? , 2016, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[3]  D. Penney,et al.  Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  John L Semmlow,et al.  Utility of an advanced digital electronic stethoscope in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared with coronary computed tomographic angiography. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  Raj Gururajan,et al.  Clinicians’ Perception of Using Digital Stethoscopes in Telehealth Platform: Queensland Telehealth Preliminary Study , 2010 .

[6]  Ha Uk Chung,et al.  Mechano-acoustic sensing of physiological processes and body motions via a soft wireless device placed at the suprasternal notch , 2019, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  A. Mackie,et al.  Cardiac Auscultation in the Modern Era: Premature Requiem or Phoenix Rising? , 2017, Cardiology in review.

[8]  James Hughes,et al.  An in vitro acoustic analysis and comparison of popular stethoscopes , 2019, Medical devices.

[9]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[10]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[11]  Supreeya Swarup,et al.  Digital stethoscope: technology update , 2018, Medical devices.

[12]  Raj Gururajan,et al.  Using digital stethoscopes in remote patient assessment via wireless networks: the user’s perspective , 2011 .

[13]  Jędrzej Kociński,et al.  Practical implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms in pulmonary auscultation examination , 2019, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[14]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Using detection theory to analyze human decision making and sensory processing , 2016 .

[15]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  The Stethoscope Gets Smart: Engineers from Johns Hopkins are giving the humble stethoscope an AI upgrade , 2019, IEEE Spectrum.

[16]  F. Ayazi,et al.  Precision wearable accelerometer contact microphones for longitudinal monitoring of mechano-acoustic cardiopulmonary signals , 2020, npj Digital Medicine.

[17]  Raymond L. Watrous,et al.  Methods and results in characterizing electronic stethoscopes , 2002, Computers in Cardiology.

[18]  Ioanna Chouvarda,et al.  An open access database for the evaluation of respiratory sound classification algorithms , 2019, Physiological measurement.

[19]  S. Taylor,et al.  An electronic stethoscope. , 1956, Lancet.

[20]  Reinhold Orglmeister,et al.  Wearable Multimodal Stethoscope Patch for Wireless Biosignal Acquisition and Long-Term Auscultation , 2019, 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[21]  Thomas J. Royston,et al.  Investigating a compact phantom and setup for testing body sound transducers , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[22]  A. Dittmar,et al.  The relationship between normal lung sounds, age, and gender. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[23]  G. Drzewiecki,et al.  Active and passive stethoscope frequency transfer functions: Electronic stethoscope frequency response , 2014, 2014 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB).

[24]  Zi Wang,et al.  [Computer-aided Diagnosis and New Electronic Stethoscope]. , 2017, Zhongguo yi liao qi xie za zhi = Chinese journal of medical instrumentation.

[25]  Josias Wacker,et al.  New biosensors and wearables for cardiorespiratory telemonitoring , 2016, 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI).

[26]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Validation of Auscultation Technologies using Objective and Clinical Comparisons , 2020, 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC).

[27]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[28]  W. R. Thompson,et al.  In defence of auscultation: a glorious future? , 2017, Heart Asia.

[29]  Stefan Krebs,et al.  The Art of Stethoscope Use: Diagnostic Listening Practices of Medical Physicians and "Auto Doctors" , 2014 .

[30]  J Genest,et al.  Clinical comparison of acoustic and electronic stethoscopes and design of a new electronic stethoscope. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  H. Vliegen,et al.  The 200th anniversary of the stethoscope: Can this low-tech device survive in the high-tech 21st century? , 2016, European heart journal.

[32]  Shihab Shamma,et al.  Change Detection in Auditory Textures. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[33]  Lukasz J Nowak,et al.  Sound differences between electronic and acoustic stethoscopes , 2018, Biomedical engineering online.

[34]  W. Frishman,et al.  Is the Stethoscope Becoming an Outdated Diagnostic Tool? , 2015, The American journal of medicine.

[35]  Faezeh Marzbanrad,et al.  Digital stethoscopes in paediatric medicine , 2019, Acta paediatrica.

[36]  George R. Wodicka,et al.  Design, construction, and evaluation of a bioacoustic transducer testing (BATT) system for respiratory sounds , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Jim Euchner Design , 2014, Catalysis from A to Z.

[38]  M. Tavel,et al.  Acoustical performance of the stethoscope: a comparative analysis. , 1982, American heart journal.

[39]  Barry Silverman,et al.  Digital Stethoscope-Improved Auscultation at the Bedside. , 2019, The American journal of cardiology.