Bidirectional Incentive Model for Bicycle Redistribution of a Bicycle Sharing System during Rush Hour

Redistribution is an important part of operational activities in a bicycle sharing system (BSS). This paper proposes that there are two types of users in a BSS: leisure travelers and commuters. The operators and the government are adopting the bidirectional incentive model (BIM) to improve their service level of redistribution. That is, the BIM stimulates leisure travelers to actively respond to bicycle resetting needs of the system; on the other hand, it guides commuters by encouraging them to avoid travelling in peak periods. This is beneficial to achieve the goals of reducing the scheduling pressure on bicycles during rush hour, and even to realize the self-resetting of the BSS. In this paper, we explore three scenarios for implementing BIM through cooperation between the operator and the government. By exploiting Stackelberg games in all models, we illustrate the quantity of users in three different travel behaviors, and surplus value of these users respectively. We also consider the trend of the profit of the operator and the government when some changes of parameters are made. The numerical analysis and case discussion find that the strategy of the operator implementing BIM with a subsidy is the best method for developed regions. In a developing region, the strategy of implementing the BIM with a direct government subsidy to users is the best choice in a small or tourist city. In these cities, the proportion of leisure travelers is always larger than 50%, resulting in a significant incentive effect. The strategy of the operator implementing BIM without a subsidy is the best choice for the large and medium-sized city.

[1]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  Predicting Public Bicycle Adoption Using the Technology Acceptance Model , 2015 .

[2]  Chi-Keung Woo,et al.  Can Hong Kong price-manage its cross-harbor-tunnel congestion? , 2015 .

[3]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Sustainable bike-sharing systems: characteristics and commonalities across cases in urban China , 2015 .

[4]  武彦 福島 持続可能性(Sustainability)の要件 , 2006 .

[5]  Hai Yang,et al.  Dynamics of modal choice of heterogeneous travelers with responsive transit services , 2016 .

[6]  Joyee Deb,et al.  Price Discrimination and Investment Incentives , 2011 .

[7]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Rule-based price control for bike sharing systems , 2014, 2014 European Control Conference (ECC).

[8]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  A destroy and repair algorithm for the Bike sharing Rebalancing Problem , 2016, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  Shi-Jer Lou,et al.  A Balanced Scorecard of Sustainable Management in the Taiwanese Bicycle Industry: Development of Performance Indicators and Importance Analysis , 2016 .

[10]  Andrew Odlyzko,et al.  The Evolution of Price Discrimination in Transportation and its Implications for the Internet , 2004 .

[11]  Enrique Benavent,et al.  Optimizing the level of service quality of a bike-sharing system , 2016 .

[12]  J. Stavins,et al.  Price Discrimination in the Airline Market: The Effect of Market Concentration , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  Changmin Jiang,et al.  Airport congestion pricing and terminal investment: Effects of terminal congestion, passenger types, and concessions , 2015 .

[14]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  A multiple type bike repositioning problem , 2016 .

[15]  Ashish Verma,et al.  The factors influencing bicycling in the Bangalore city , 2016 .

[16]  Tao Feng,et al.  Research on Urban Road Congestion Pricing Strategy Considering Carbon Dioxide Emissions , 2015 .

[17]  Tomás Eiró,et al.  An Optimisation Algorithm to Establish the Location of Stations of a Mixed Fleet Biking System: An Application to the City of Lisbon , 2012 .

[18]  John Lygeros,et al.  Balancing bike sharing systems through customer cooperation - a case study on London's Barclays Cycle Hire , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[19]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Dynamic Vehicle Redistribution and Online Price Incentives in Shared Mobility Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Distance-dependent congestion pricing for downtown zones , 2015 .

[21]  Luca Di Gaspero,et al.  Balancing bike sharing systems with constraint programming , 2016, Constraints.

[22]  Hai Yang,et al.  Dynamic congestion pricing with day-to-day flow evolution and user heterogeneity , 2015 .

[23]  André de Palma,et al.  Investment and the use of tax and toll revenues in the transport sector , 2007 .

[24]  Iris A. Forma,et al.  A 3-step math heuristic for the static repositioning problem in bike-sharing systems , 2015 .

[25]  Guowei Hua,et al.  The Carbon Subsidy Analysis in Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain , 2014 .

[26]  David M Levinson,et al.  Paying for the Fixed Costs of Roads , 2005 .

[27]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Incentivizing Users for Balancing Bike Sharing Systems , 2015, AAAI.

[28]  Dirk C. Mattfeld,et al.  Anticipatory Service Network Design of Bike Sharing Systems , 2015 .

[29]  S. Lawphongpanich,et al.  Path-differentiated pricing in congestion mitigation , 2015 .

[30]  Patrick Vogel,et al.  Service Network Design of Bike Sharing Systems , 2016 .

[31]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: A GIS approach , 2012 .

[32]  Robert D. Willig,et al.  Consumer's Surplus Without Apology , 1976 .

[33]  Elliot W. Martin,et al.  Public Bikesharing in North America during a Period of Rapid Expansion: Understanding Business Models, Industry Trends, and User Impacts , 2014 .