Assessing disciplinary differences in information literacy teaching materials

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to uncover similarities and differences among emphasized information literacy (IL) skills for the disciplines of political- and social sciences, economics, educational sciences, law sciences, mathematics, life sciences, history and German studies, based on an analysis of IL teaching materials. Design/methodology/approach Eight issues of the German language publication series Erfolgreich recherchieren (Succesful Research Strategies) are compared by using a structuring content analysis. The category system is based on the IL standards and performance indicators of the Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), extended with additional categories. Findings The results, first, suggest that the biggest similarities and differences among the disciplines are found concerning the determination of the nature and extent of the needed information, especially in the area of identifying potential sources of information. Second, some of the disciplines focus more on international sources, whereas others focus on country- and language-specific sources. Third, the criteria to define the appropriate retrieval system differ among the various disciplines. Fourth, approaches to narrow the search results differ among the various disciplines. Fifth, the critical evaluation of sources is addressed in all disciplines but relates to different contexts. Research limitations/implications This approach only addresses one book per discipline out of a German language book series. Further research is needed. Originality/value This paper is unique in its approach and one of few papers on disciplinary differences in IL perception.

[1]  Amy R. Hofer,et al.  Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education , 2014 .

[2]  Christy R. Stevens,et al.  Collaborating with Librarians to Develop Lower Division Political Science Students' Information Literacy Competencies , 2008 .

[3]  Sabine Seufert,et al.  Teaching Information Literacy in Secondary Education: How to Design Professional Development for Teachers? , 2016, LTEC@KMO.

[4]  Bruce E. Massis,et al.  MOOCs and the library , 2013 .

[5]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Multiple Literacies, New Literacies, and Teacher Education , 2006 .

[6]  Stefan Dreisiebner,et al.  Comparing information literacy of student beginners among different branches of study , 2017 .

[7]  Philip Doty,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Digital Libraries for K–12 Mathematics Education: Part 1, Information Organization, Information Literacy, and Integrated Learning1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[8]  Patricia A Iannuzzi.  Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education , 2000 .

[9]  Sophie Bury.  Faculty attitudes, perceptions and experiences of information literacy: a study across multiple disciplines at York University, Canada. , 2011 .

[10]  Jenny Bronstein,et al.  Three Perspectives on Information Literacy in Academia: Talking to Librarians, Faculty, and Students , 2018, Coll. Res. Libr..

[11]  Pradeepa Wijetunge,et al.  Empowering 8 Ò in practice: information literacy programme for law undergraduates revisited , 2014 .

[12]  M. Gregory.  What should introductory courses do , 1984 .

[13]  Jonathan Cope,et al.  Do We Speak the Same Language?: A Study of Faculty Perceptions of Information Literacy , 2014 .

[14]  Stuart Boon,et al.  A phenomenographic study of English faculty's conceptions of information literacy , 2007, J. Documentation.

[15]  J. Davies,et al.  Information literacy in the law curriculum: Experiences from Cardiff , 2005 .

[16]  Stefan Dreisiebner.  Examining Subject-Specific Information Literacy Elements on Economics and Business Administration for Use in a MOOC , 2018, ECIL.

[17]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[18]  Kirsti Ala-Mutka.  Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding , 2011 .

[19]  Anne Morris,et al.  The problem of information overload in business organisations: a review of the literature , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[20]  Maria Pinto.  Information literacy perceptions and behaviour among history students , 2012, Aslib Proc..

[21]  H. Gore,et al.  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Their Impact on Academic Library Services: Exploring the Issues and Challenges , 2014 .

[22]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning , 2016 .

[23]  J. Bail,et al.  Cognitive Processes and Information Literacy: Some Initial Results From a Survey of Business Students’ Learning Activities , 2014 .

[24]  Jane Secker,et al.  Rethinking information literacy : a practical framework for supporting learning , 2013 .

[25]  Stephen H. Plum.  Library Use and the Development of Critical Thought. , 1984 .

[26]  Jacqui Weetman DaCosta,et al.  Is There an Information Literacy Skills Gap to Be Bridged? An Examination of Faculty Perceptions and Activities Relating to Information Literacy in the United States and England , 2010, Coll. Res. Libr..

[27]  L. Saunders.  Faculty Perspectives on Information Literacy as a Student Learning Outcome , 2012 .

[28]  L. Hock,et al.  Information Literacy across the German‐Studies Curriculum1 , 2008 .

[29]  Melissa R. Gross,et al.  What's skill got to do with it?: Information literacy skills and self-views of ability among first-year college students , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Stefan Dreisiebner.  Content and instructional design of MOOCs on information literacy , 2019, Information and Learning Sciences.

[31]  Maria Pinto,et al.  Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies , 2016, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[32]  Maria Pinto,et al.  Uncovering information literacy’s disciplinary differences through students’ attitudes: An empirical study , 2015, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[33]  William B. Badke,et al.  Situating Information Literacy in the Disciplines: A Practical and Systematic Approach for Academic Librarians , 2015 .

[34]  Monica D. T. Rysavy,et al.  Information literacy in 2015: International graduate business students' perceptions of information literacy skills compared to test-assessed skills , 2016 .

[35]  Polly D. Boruff-Jones,et al.  Information literacy. , 2009, Radiologic technology.

[36]  Virginia M. Tiefel.  Library User Education: Examining Its Past, Projecting Its Future , 1995, Libr. Trends.

[37]  A. Grafstein.  A discipline-based approach to information literacy , 2002 .

[38]  J. East.  Information literacy for the humanities researcher: A syllabus based on information habits research , 2005 .

[39]  Ivanka Stricevic,et al.  Professors' Influence on Students' Choice of Format for Their Research Materials: Are There Differences Between the Academic Disciplines? , 2014, ECIL.

[40]  Sasekea Yoneka Harris.  Undergraduates’ assessment of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) information literacy instruction , 2017 .

[41]  Sophie Bury,et al.  Learning from faculty voices on information literacy: Opportunities and challenges for undergraduate information literacy education , 2016 .

[42]  Lorna Uden,et al.  Learning Technology for Education in Cloud – The Changing Face of Education , 2016, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[43]  C. Bruce.  Workplace experiences of information literacy , 1999 .

[44]  Louise Klusek,et al.  Information Literacy Skills for Business Careers , 2006 .