Within-subject variability of differences between conventional and automated blood pressure measurements in pregnancy.

[1]  T. Henriksen.  [Measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy]. , 1998, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[2]  E. O’Brien,et al.  Can 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement predict the development of hypertension in primigravidae? , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  P. Rubin.  Measuring diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy , 1996, BMJ.

[4]  A. Franx,et al.  The fourth sound of Korotkoff in pregnancy: a myth? , 1996, The Lancet.

[5]  A. Halligan,et al.  Lack of reproducibility in pregnancy of Korotkoff phase IV as measured by mercury sphygmomanometry , 1996, The Lancet.

[6]  M. Quinn.  Validation of automated blood pressure recording in pregnancy , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  A. Franx,et al.  Validation of automated blood pressure recording in pregnancy , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  F. Mee,et al.  Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system in normotensive pregnant women determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol , 1993, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[9]  Steven Vine.  Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy , 1993, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[10]  F. Mee,et al.  Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement in a primigravid population , 1993, Journal of hypertension.

[11]  G. Parati,et al.  Commentary on the revised British Hypertension Society protocol for evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices: a critique of aspects related to 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement. , 1993, Journal of hypertension.

[12]  F. Mee,et al.  Comparative accuracy of six ambulatory devices according to blood pressure levels , 1993, Journal of hypertension.

[13]  A. Coats,et al.  British hypertension protocol. , 1991, Journal of Hypertension.

[14]  F. Mee,et al.  Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol. , 1991, Journal of hypertension.

[15]  I. Perry,et al.  Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  I. Macgillivray,et al.  Recording diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy. , 1991, BMJ.

[17]  I. Perry,et al.  Recording diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy. , 1990, BMJ.

[18]  E. O’Brien,et al.  The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. , 1990, Journal of hypertension.

[19]  A. G. Shaper,et al.  Observer bias in blood pressure studies. , 1988, Journal of hypertension.

[20]  C. Redman,et al.  Eclampsia still kills , 1988, British medical journal.

[21]  I. Macgillivray,et al.  The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  W. W. Daniel.  Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1978 .

[23]  A. Franx,et al.  COMPARISON OF AN AUSCULTATORY VERSUS AN OSCILLOMETRIC AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR IN NORMOTENSIVE, HYPERTENSIVE, AND PREECLAMPTIC PREGNANCY , 1997 .

[24]  G. Lip,et al.  Measurement of Diastolic Blood Pressure in Obstetrical Research , 1996 .

[25]  I. Perry.  Diastolic Blood Pressure in Pregnancy: Phase Iv or Phase V Korotkoff Sounds? , 1996 .

[26]  C. Goodman.  Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation , 1988 .

[27]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Pregnancy hypertension : a systematic evaluation of clinical diagnostic criteria , 1977 .

[28]  E. C. Poulton.  Observer bias. , 1975, Applied ergonomics.