How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?

The face inversion effect (FIE) is defined as the larger decrease in recognition performance for faces than for other mono-oriented objects when they are presented upside down. Behavioral studies suggest the FIE takes place at the perceptual encoding stage and is mainly due to the decrease in ability to extract relational information when discriminating individual faces. Recently, functional magnetic resonance imaging and scalp event-related potentials studies found that turning faces upside down slightly but significantly decreases the response of face-selective brain regions, including the so-called fusiform face area (FFA), and increases activity of other areas selective for nonface objects. Face inversion leads to a significantly delayed (sometimes larger) N170 component, an occipito-temporal scalp potential associated with the perceptual encoding of faces and objects. These modulations are in agreement with the perceptual locus of the FIE and reinforce the view that the FFA and N170 are sensitive to individual face discrimination.

[1]  L. Frank.  The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[2]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Recognition of faces: I. An exploratory study , 1967 .

[3]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[4]  K. F. Scapinello,et al.  The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli , 1970 .

[5]  A. D. Yarmey,et al.  Recognition memory for familiar “public” faces: Effects of orientation and delay , 1971 .

[6]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  Models for the processing and identification of faces , 1971 .

[7]  I. Rock.  The perception of disoriented figures. , 1974, Scientific American.

[8]  H. Ellis.  Recognizing faces. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[9]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[10]  R. Phillips,et al.  Recognition of Upright and Inverted Faces: A Correlational Study , 1979, Perception.

[11]  S. Carey,et al.  Development of face recognition: A maturational component? , 1980 .

[12]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[13]  P. Feyereisen,et al.  A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces , 1983, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[16]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[17]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[21]  V. Bruce,et al.  Mental rotation of faces , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[22]  D. Purcell,et al.  The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction time studies , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  A. Lee,et al.  What's in a face? The case of autism. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[25]  T. Valentine.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[26]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[28]  O. Koenig,et al.  Separable Mechanisms in Face Processing: Evidence from Hemispheric Specialization , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  T. Valentine.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[30]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  E T Rolls,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  S. Carey.  Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  M. Young,et al.  Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.

[34]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  R. Bruyer,et al.  Effect of disorientation on visual analysis, familiarity decision and semantic decision on faces. , 1993, British journal of psychology.

[36]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Neurophysiology of shape processing , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..

[37]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  G. Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[40]  W A Roberts,et al.  Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia). , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[41]  T. Allison,et al.  Human extrastriate visual cortex and the perception of faces, words, numbers, and colors. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  P. Schyns,et al.  The Ontogeny of Part Representation in Object Concepts , 1994 .

[43]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[44]  I. Nachson.  On the modularity of face recognition: the riddle of domain specificity. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[45]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[47]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Functional imaging of human visual recognition. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[49]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  C. Umilta,et al.  Face preference at birth. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[52]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied with functional MRI , 1997 .

[55]  M. Tarr,et al.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Current Biology.

[56]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[57]  P. Schyns,et al.  Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .

[58]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[59]  Sam S. Rakover,et al.  Facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Expertise in object and face recognition , 1997 .

[61]  C. Michel,et al.  Evidence for rapid face recognition from human scalp and intracranial electrodes , 1997, Neuroreport.

[62]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[64]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[65]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[66]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[67]  M. Tovée,et al.  Face processing: Getting by with a little help from its friends , 1998, Current Biology.

[68]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[69]  Sönke Johannes,et al.  Brain potentials reveal the timing of face identity and expression judgments , 1998, Neuroscience Research.

[70]  L. Parr,et al.  Why Faces May Be Special: Evidence of the Inversion Effect in Chimpanzees , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  M Eimer,et al.  Does the face‐specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? , 1998, Neuroreport.

[72]  V. Bruce,et al.  Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[73]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[74]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[75]  B. Rossion,et al.  Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[76]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[77]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  B Renault,et al.  Differential processing of part-to-whole and part-to-part face priming: an ERP study. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[79]  R A McCarthy,et al.  Prosopagnosia and structural encoding of faces: evidence from event-related potentials. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[80]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials , 1999 .

[81]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[82]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The Parahippocampal Place Area Recognition, Navigation, or Encoding? , 1999, Neuron.

[83]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[84]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[85]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[87]  L. Deouell,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia , 1999 .

[88]  E. Halgren,et al.  Location of human face‐selective cortex with respect to retinotopic areas , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[89]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[90]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[91]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[92]  M. Eimer.  Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[93]  G. Hole,et al.  Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.

[94]  K. Nakayama,et al.  RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN FUSIFORM FACE AREA , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[95]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[96]  M. Tarr,et al.  DOES VISUAL SUBORDINATE-LEVEL CATEGORISATION ENGAGE THE FUNCTIONALLY DEFINED FUSIFORM FACE AREA? , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[97]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[98]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[99]  B. Rossion,et al.  Right N170 modulation in a face discrimination task: an account for categorical perception of familiar faces. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[100]  M. Eimer.  The face‐specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[101]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[102]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Is the face‐sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[103]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[104]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[105]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[106]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[107]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[108]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[109]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[110]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[111]  M. Eimer.  Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[112]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[113]  F. Volkmar,et al.  Abnormal ventral temporal cortical activity during face discrimination among individuals with autism and Asperger syndrome. , 2000, Archives of general psychiatry.

[114]  S Braeutigam,et al.  Task-dependent early latency (30–60 ms) visual processing of human faces and other objects , 2001, Neuroreport.

[115]  G. Tiberghien,et al.  An event-related potential study of contextual modifications in a face recognition task , 2001, Neuroreport.

[116]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[117]  F. Simion,et al.  The origins of face perception: specific versus non‐specific mechanisms , 2001 .

[118]  R C Burgess,et al.  Event related potentials I , 1992, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[119]  The role of spatial frequencies in face-selective areas: Task-dependent effects , 2001, NeuroImage.

[120]  J. Tanaka.  The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[121]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[122]  C. Bernard,et al.  Event-Related Potentials for Category-Specific Information During Passive Viewing of Faces and Objects , 2001, The International journal of neuroscience.

[123]  G. E. Edmonds,et al.  Direction of gaze effects on early face processing: eyes-only versus full faces. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[124]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[125]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[126]  Michael W. Spratling,et al.  Disordered visual processing and oscillatory brain activity in autism and Williams Syndrome , 2001, Neuroreport.

[127]  D. Weiskopf,et al.  The role of color in high-level vision , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[128]  Differentiating object categorization and recognition processes: A high density ERP study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[129]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[130]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[131]  V Bruce,et al.  Configural Features in the Context of Upright and Inverted Faces , 2001, Perception.

[132]  Author.  $article.title , 2002, Nature.

[133]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[134]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[135]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  The influence of stimulus orientation on the vertex positive scalp potential evoked by faces , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[136]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[137]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representation, similarity, and the chorus of prototypes , 1993, Minds and Machines.

[138]  Joachim Bodamer,et al.  Die Prosop-Agnosie , 2004, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[139]  D. Jeffreys.  A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.