Ontological Mediation for Multi-Agent Systems

A major performance factor when gathering information across a platform like the World Wide Web is the efficiency of the search and retrieval system. The effectiveness of current search and retrieval systems is restricted as they do not use the semantics of the data but only utilize keywords. Using a multi-agent system where agents gather information and organize it, creating ontologies, is a very viable approach to the problem. Major difficulties that arise during collaboration among such information-providing agents are ambiguity and data misinterpretation. This is due to the diversity of ontology creators, differences in linguistics, and ontological overlapping. Users may also knowingly or unknowingly add incorrect information to ontologies. Ontological mediation tries to address such collaboration issues relating to ambiguous and unfamiliar information arising due to various reasons. We propose a communication-based approach for ontological mediation. In the process, we also present a classification model for ontological mediation.

[1]  C. Reddick Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management , 2010 .

[2]  Suzanne Beaumaster E-Participation Models , 2007 .

[3]  Valentina Mele Paradigm and Practice: The Innovative Organization to Deal with E-Government , 2005 .

[4]  Yudi Fernando,et al.  Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[5]  Chris Jarvis,et al.  Accessing Public Sector Environmental Data and Information: Development and Demonstration of a National Portal , 2008 .

[6]  Barbara Miller,et al.  Electronic Government, Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, Ed. New York: Information Science Reference, 2008, 4, 780 pp. $1950.00, ISBN 978-1-59904-947-2. Online access only: $1850.00 , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Marc Holzer,et al.  Public Administrators' Acceptance of the Practice of Digital Democracy: A Model Explaining the Utilization of Online Policy Forums in South Korea , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[8]  D. Foo,et al.  Green Technologies , 2020 .

[9]  Bram Klievink,et al.  The Role of Intermediaries in Multi-Channel Service Delivery Strategies , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[10]  David Lazer,et al.  Home (Page) Style: Determinates of the Quality of the House Members' Web Sites , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[11]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Transnational Information Sharing, Event Notification, Rule Enforcement and Process Coordination , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[12]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[13]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Successful e-government in Singapore , 2004, CACM.

[14]  G. David Garson Modern Public Information Technology Systems: Issues and Challenges , 2007 .

[15]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Swoop: A Web Ontology Editing Browser , 2006, J. Web Semant..

[16]  Marco Carvalho In-Stream Data Processing for Tactical Environments , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[17]  Philip Calvert,et al.  Encyclopedia of Digital Government , 2008 .

[18]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Current practices of leading e-government countries , 2005, Commun. ACM.