Outcome of Patients Treated with Engager Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term and midterm outcome of the Engager transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) system, a transapical self-expanding valve device with anatomic orientation. Methods Transapical aortic valve implantation with the Engager valve prosthesis was performed in 10 patients. Endpoints were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium recommendations for reporting outcomes of TAVI in clinical trials. Follow-up has been completed after 30 days and 1 year. Results All patients underwent the implantation procedure successfully. No device-related or delivery system–related complications were observed. One patient died of non–device-related reasons at postoperative day 23 in multiorgan failure. At 30-day follow-up, no more than mild transvalvular and paravalvular aortic regurgitation were seen. After 1 year, no transvalvular regurgitation was observed as assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. None of the patients had more than mild paravalvular leakage. The mean ± SD gradient was 15.3 ± 4.2 mm Hg. New York Heart Association class decreased one degree in mean and sustained until 1-year follow-up. No more patients died until 1-year follow-up. Conclusions Application of the Engager TAVI system is safe and reliable. Prosthesis deployment in an anatomically correct position was facilitated by the design of the valve prosthesis and successful in all patients. No device-related or delivery system–related complications occurred. Procedural, short-term, and midterm results up to 1 year concerning the aortic valve performance are promising, with stable mean gradients and low rates of even mild regurgitation.

[1]  S. Shaughnessy,et al.  Do No Harm: Health Systems’ Duty to Promote Clinician Well-Being , 2022, American Journal of Hospital Medicine.

[2]  T. Walther,et al.  Trans-apical aortic valve implantation: univariate and multivariate analyses of the early results from the SOURCE registry. , 2010, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  Philippe Pibarot,et al.  Severe valvular regurgitation and late prosthesis embolization after percutaneous aortic valve implantation. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  P. Serruys,et al.  2-year follow-up of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a self-expanding valve prosthesis. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Scott Lim,et al.  Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Fabian Nietlispach,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Impact on Clinical and Valve-Related Outcomes , 2009, Circulation.

[7]  E. Schwammenthal,et al.  Transapical aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding anatomically oriented valve. , 2011, European heart journal.

[8]  R. Lange,et al.  Feasibility of the Engager™ aortic transcatheter valve system using a flexible over-the-wire design. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Transapical aortic valve implantation using a new self-expandable bioprosthesis (ACURATE TA™): 6-month outcomes. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  P. Serruys,et al.  Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium , 2010, European heart journal.

[11]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation; the initial 50 patients. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  Fabian Nietlispach,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: transfemoral versus transapical approach. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Successful percutaneous management of left main trunk occlusion during percutaneous aortic valve replacement , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  G. Schuler,et al.  Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence and early outcome. Results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry , 2011, Heart.

[16]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Need for permanent pacemaker as a complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis and similar baseline electrocardiographic findings. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  G. Schuler,et al.  Trans-apical aortic valve implantation using a new self-expandable bioprosthesis: initial outcomes. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  F. Mohr,et al.  Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the JenaValve™ system: acute and 30-day results of the multicentre CE-mark study. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[19]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  One-Year Outcomes of Cohort 1 in the Edwards SAPIEN Aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: The European Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Edwards SAPIEN Valve , 2011, Circulation.