The dominance of seismic signaling and selection for signal complexity in Schizocosa multimodal courtship displays

Schizocosa wolf spiders show tremendous diversity in courtship complexity, with different species employing varying numbers of components within and across sensory modalities. Using a comparative approach, we investigate the importance of each signaling modality in the courtship display of five Schizocosa species (three stridulating and two drumming) by assessing mating success under manipulated signaling environments. Irrespective of the degree of male ornamentation, the three stridulating species exhibit a dependence on the seismic, but not visual, signaling environment for mating success. Mating was independent of signaling environment for the two drumming species. We next ask whether the degree to which each species depends upon a signaling modality for mating (i.e., modality importance) is correlated with the estimated modality-specific signal complexity. We first calculate effect sizes for the influence of seismic versus visual signaling environments on the likelihood to mate for ten Schizocosa species and then use an element-counting approach to calculate seismic and visual signal complexity scores. We use a phylogenetic regression analysis to test two predictions: (1) the importance of seismic signaling is correlated with seismic signal complexity and (2) the importance of visual signaling is correlated with visual signal complexity. We find a significant relationship between visual signal importance and visual signal complexity, but no relationship between seismic signal importance and seismic signal complexity. Finally, we test the hypothesis that selection acts on complexity per se by determining whether seismic and visual signal complexity is correlated across species. We find support for this hypothesis in a significant relationship between seismic and visual signal complexity.

[1]  P. Pye-Smith.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[2]  ダーウィン チャールス,et al.  The descent of man and selection in relation to sex , 1907 .

[3]  C. Dondale,et al.  REVISION OF THE NEARCTIC WOLF SPIDER GENUS SCHIZOCOSA (ARANEIDA: LYCOSIDAE) , 1978, The Canadian Entomologist.

[4]  W. Tietjen.  IS THE SEX PHEROMONE OF LYCOSA RABIDA (ARANEAE : LYCOSIDAE) DEPOSITED ON A SUBSTRATUM? ' , 1979 .

[5]  P. Bell,et al.  Transmission of vibrations along plant stems: implications for insect communication. , 1980 .

[6]  G. Uetz,et al.  Acoustic Communication and Reproductive Isolation in Two Species of Wolf Spiders , 1981, Science.

[7]  H. Gerhardt.  Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .

[8]  G. Uetz,et al.  Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproductive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  A. Basolo.  Female Preference Predates the Evolution of the Sword in Swordtail Fish , 1990, Science.

[10]  G. E. Stratton.  A New Species of Wolf Spider, Schizocosa Stridulans (Araneae, Lycosidae) , 1991 .

[11]  J. Endler.  Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Multiple Displays in Animal Communication:`Backup Signals' and `Multiple Messages' , 1996 .

[13]  G. Uetz,et al.  Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  E. Hebets,et al.  Habitat and courtship behavior of the wolf spider Schizocosa retrorsa (banks) (Araneae, Lycosidae) , 1996 .

[15]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers , 1996, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[16]  G. Uetz,et al.  Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signalling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  G. E. Stratton.  A New Species of Schizocosa from the Southeastern Usa (Araneae, Lycosidae) , 1997 .

[18]  B. Grant,et al.  Genetics and the origin of bird species. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  E. Hebets,et al.  Geographical variation in male courtship behaviour and sexual isolation in wolf spiders of the genusSchizocosa , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  J A Endler,et al.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  G. Uetz,et al.  Female responses to isolated signals from multimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genusSchizocosa(Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  P. Marler,et al.  Communication Goes Multimodal , 1999, Science.

[23]  C. Rowe.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  G. Uetz,et al.  Leg ornamentation and the efficacy of courtship display in four species of wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Sexual selection and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  D. Swofford.  PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[27]  G. Uetz,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FEEDING REGIME ON BODY SIZE, BODY CONDITION AND A MALE SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTER IN SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE): CONDITION-DEPENDENCE IN A VISUAL SIGNALING TRAIT , 2002 .

[28]  G. Uetz,et al.  Multisensory Cues and Multimodal Communication in Spiders: Insights from Video/Audio Playback Studies , 2002, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[29]  J. Boughman.  How sensory drive can promote speciation , 2002 .

[30]  K. Shaw,et al.  Divergence of Mate Recognition Behavior and Its Consequences for Genetic Architectures of Speciation , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[31]  D. Blumstein.  Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[32]  A. Paterson,et al.  Combined molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of the New Zealand wolf spider genus Anoteropsis (Araneae: Lycosidae). , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[33]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  E. Hebets.  Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: Exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[36]  U. Candolin.  The use of multiple cues in mate choice , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[38]  R. Hoy,et al.  The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus dossenus (Araneae: Salticidae) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[39]  A. Møller,et al.  Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..

[41]  G. Uetz,et al.  Flexibility in the multi-modal courtship of a wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata , 2004, Journal of Ethology.

[42]  D. Posada,et al.  Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[43]  D. Papaj,et al.  Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  G. Uetz,et al.  Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characters , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  E. Hebets.  Attention-altering Signal Interactions in the Multimodal Courtship Display of the Wolf Spider Schizocosa Uetzi , 2004 .

[46]  H. Kishino,et al.  Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[47]  G. E. Stratton,et al.  EVOLUTION OF ORNAMENTATION AND COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR IN SCHIZOCOSA: INSIGHTS FROM A PHYLOGENY BASED ON MORPHOLOGY (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) , 2005 .

[48]  M. Hedin,et al.  The effects of preservatives and temperatures on arachnid DNA , 2005 .

[49]  R. Cocroft,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication , 2005 .

[50]  J. Felsenstein.  Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[51]  A. Schmitz,et al.  Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. , 2005, Systematic biology.

[52]  R. Hoy,et al.  Measuring and quantifying dynamic visual signals in jumping spiders , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[53]  R. Cocroft,et al.  Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  G. Uetz,et al.  MATING IN THE ABSENCE OF VISUAL CUES BY SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA (HENTZ 1844) WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) , 2006 .

[55]  Norman Lee,et al.  Seismic signal production in a wolf spider: parallel versus serial multi-component signals , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[56]  G. Uetz,et al.  Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available males, female age and reproductive state , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[57]  E. Hebets,et al.  Experience leads to preference: experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders , 2007 .

[58]  K. Zhou,et al.  Incongruous nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeographic patterns in two sympatric lineages of the wolf spider Pardosa astrigera (Araneae: Lycosidae) from China. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[59]  E. Hebets.  SUBADULT FEMALE EXPERIENCE DOES NOT INFLUENCE SPECIES RECOGNITION IN THE WOLF SPIDER SCHIZOCOSA UETZI STRATTON 1997 , 2007 .

[60]  V. Framenau,et al.  A REVIEW OF LEG ORNAMENTATION IN MALE WOLF SPIDERS, WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES FROM AUSTRALIA, ARTORIA SCHIZOCOIDES (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) , 2007 .

[61]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[62]  W. Hochachka,et al.  How reliable are the methods for estimating repertoire size? , 2008, Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[63]  E. Hebets.  Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991. , 2008, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[64]  P. Shamble,et al.  Diet influences mate choice selectivity in adult female wolf spiders , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  Jeremy S. Gibson,et al.  Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  A. Mason,et al.  Substrate-dependent signalling success in the wolf spider, Schizocosa retrorsa , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  K. Fowler-Finn,et al.  Exploring the maintenance of and selection on two distinct male morphs in a Schizocosa wolf spider , 2009 .

[68]  G. Uetz,et al.  Multimodal communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: female response to multimodal versus unimodal signals , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  Dustin J. Wilgers,et al.  Courtship effort is a better predictor of mating success than ornamentation for male wolf spiders , 2009 .

[70]  Roger D. Santer,et al.  Multimodal courtship efficacy of Schizocosa retrorsa wolf spiders: implications of an additional signal modality , 2010 .

[71]  G. Uetz,et al.  Courtship and mating behavior of the wolf spider Schizocosa bilineata (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 2010 .

[72]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology , 2010, Bioinform..

[73]  J. Tobias,et al.  SONG DIVERGENCE BY SENSORY DRIVE IN AMAZONIAN BIRDS , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[74]  A. Mason,et al.  A signal-substrate match in the substrate-borne component of a multimodal courtship display , 2010 .

[75]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  A review of acoustic playback techniques for studying avian vocal duets , 2010 .

[76]  J. Byers,et al.  Female mate choice based upon male motor performance , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  Dustin J. Wilgers,et al.  FEMALES ARE CHOOSIER IN THE DARK: ENVIRONMENT‐DEPENDENT RELIANCE ON COURTSHIP COMPONENTS AND ITS IMPACT ON FITNESS , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[78]  K. Kraaijeveld,et al.  Sexual selection and speciation: the comparative evidence revisited , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[79]  E. Hebets,et al.  Modality-specific experience with female feedback increases the efficacy of courtship signalling in male wolf spiders , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[80]  Dustin J. Wilgers,et al.  Enigmatic ornamentation eases male reliance on courtship performance for mating success , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[81]  Dustin J. Wilgers,et al.  Age-related female mating decisions are condition dependent in wolf spiders , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[82]  Dustin J. Wilgers,et al.  Complex courtship displays facilitate male reproductive success and plasticity in signaling across variable environments , 2011 .

[83]  Eileen A. Hebets,et al.  Current Status and Future Directions of Research in Complex Signaling , 2011 .

[84]  Mitch Bern.  EXPLORING SOURCES OF SELECTION ON THE MULTIMODAL COURTSHIP DISPLAYS OF TWO SISTER SPECIES OF WOLF SPIDERS: SCHIZOCOSA CRASSIPALPATA AND SCHIZOCOSA BILINEATA , 2011 .

[85]  G. Uetz,et al.  Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[86]  William E. Wagner,et al.  Mate sampling strategy in a field cricket: evidence for a fixed threshold strategy with last chance option , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[87]  E. Hebets,et al.  Resource heterogeneity interacts with courtship rate to influence mating success in the wolf spider Schizocosa floridana , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[88]  M. Servedio.  The relationship between sexual selection and speciation , 2012 .

[89]  M. Symonds,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX COLOR PATTERNS IN DRAGON LIZARDS , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[90]  Dustin J. Wilgers,et al.  Seismic Signaling is Crucial for Female Mate Choice in a Multimodal Signaling Wolf Spider , 2012 .

[91]  W. Maddison,et al.  Orchestrating the score: complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) , 2012 .

[92]  Jeremy S. Gibson,et al.  Effect of rearing environment and food availability on seismic signalling in male wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[93]  G. Höbel,et al.  Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences , 2013, Ecology letters.

[94]  R. Safran,et al.  Variation in the temporal and spatial use of signals and its implications for multimodal communication , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[95]  E. Hebets,et al.  Female mate choice for multimodal courtship and the importance of the signaling background for selection on male ornamentation , 2013 .