Muscle Activation Strategies and Symmetry of Spinal Loading in the Lumbar Spine With Scoliosis

Study Design. Biomechanical analysis of muscle and spinal forces in a lumbar spine with scoliosis. Objectives. To calculate spinal loading asymmetry and its dependence on muscle activation strategy. Summary of Background Data. It is commonly assumed that a spine with scoliosis experiences greater loading on the concave side and that this asymmetric loading causes asymmetric growth and progression of deformity. However, neither the magnitude of the asymmetric loading imposed on the spine as a function of the scoliosis curve nor the resulting mechanically altered vertebral growth and disc remodeling have been quantified. Methods. Spinal loading was estimated in a lumbar spine model with increasing degrees of scoliosis. External loading was each of three pure moments or forces acting at T12, with magnitudes of either 50% or 75% of maximum effort. For each external loading, the muscle activation patterns were determined with each of three different muscle activation strategies in an optimization model: 1) minimize the sum of cubed muscle stresses; 2) minimize spinal asymmetric load (i.e., “follower load”); and 3) reverse the spinal load asymmetry (increased compression on convex side) at the level of the apex. Results. The first strategy produced loading that tended to increase the curve magnitude, with the resultant force acting at up to 15 mm lateral to the intervertebral disc center. Both Strategies 2 and 3 had increased muscle stress averaging between 42% and 75%. Conclusions. We speculate that individuals with scoliosis can adopt different muscle activation strategies and that these strategies may determine whether or not the spinal loading causes scoliosis progression during growth. Muscle activation patterns generating spinal loading that does not promote curve progression during growth have greater physiologic cost.

[1]  I. Stokes,et al.  Structural behavior of human lumbar spinal motion segments. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  D. Périé,et al.  Intervertebral disc modeling using a MRI method: migration of the nucleus zone within scoliotic intervertebral discs. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  R ROAF,et al.  Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  S. Bibby,et al.  Intervertebral Disc Composition in Neuromuscular Scoliosis: Changes in Cell Density and Glycosaminoglycan Concentration at the Curve Apex , 2001, Spine.

[5]  H Labelle,et al.  Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth modulation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  A. Schultz,et al.  Trunk Muscle Activities in Braced Scoliosis Patients , 1989, Spine.

[7]  I A Stokes,et al.  Quantitative anatomy of the lumbar musculature. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  A. F. Mannion,et al.  Paraspinal muscle fibre type alterations associated with scoliosis: an old problem revisited with new evidence , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[9]  I. Stokes Analysis of Symmetry of Vertebral Body Loading Consequent to Lateral Spinal Curvature , 1997, Spine.

[10]  D. Katz,et al.  Relationship of Peak Height Velocity to Other Maturity Indicators in Idiopathic Scoliosis in Girls* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  I. Stokes,et al.  Spinal stiffness increases with axial load: another stabilizing consequence of muscle action. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Electromyography of scoliotic patients treated with a brace , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  R. Hughes,et al.  Evaluation of muscle force prediction models of the lumbar trunk using surface electromyography , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. , 1999, Spine.

[15]  M. Aebi,et al.  Elevated synthetic activity in the convex side of scoliotic intervertebral discs and endplates compared with normal tissues. , 2001, Spine.

[16]  J C Fairbank,et al.  Electrochemical Measurement of Transport Into Scoliotic Intervertebral Discs In Vivo Using Nitrous Oxide as a Tracer , 2001, Spine.

[17]  S. Bibby,et al.  Cell Viability in Scoliotic Discs in Relation to Disc Deformity and Nutrient Levels , 2002, Spine.

[18]  I A Stokes,et al.  Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.