Impaired perceptual learning in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome is mediated by parvalbumin neuron dysfunction and is reversible.

To uncover the circuit-level alterations that underlie atypical sensory processing associated with autism, we adopted a symptom-to-circuit approach in the Fmr1-knockout (Fmr1–/–) mouse model of Fragile X syndrome. Using a go/no-go task and in vivo two-photon calcium imaging, we find that impaired visual discrimination in Fmr1–/– mice correlates with marked deficits in orientation tuning of principal neurons and with a decrease in the activity of parvalbumin interneurons in primary visual cortex. Restoring visually evoked activity in parvalbumin cells in Fmr1–/– mice with a chemogenetic strategy using designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs was sufficient to rescue their behavioral performance. Strikingly, human subjects with Fragile X syndrome exhibit impairments in visual discrimination similar to those in Fmr1–/– mice. These results suggest that manipulating inhibition may help sensory processing in Fragile X syndrome.Goel et al found similar deficits in visual discrimination in humans and in a mouse model of FXS. In mice, a robust decrease in PV cell activity mediated this impairment, suggesting that manipulating inhibition may improve sensory processing in FXS.

[1]  G. Arbanas Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) , 2015 .

[2]  G. Fisone,et al.  Somatosensory map expansion and altered processing of tactile inputs in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome , 2016, Neurobiology of Disease.

[3]  J. Michaud,et al.  Alterations of visual and auditory evoked potentials in fragile X syndrome , 2014, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[4]  Carlos Portera-Cailliau,et al.  Tactile Defensiveness and Impaired Adaptation of Neuronal Activity in the Fmr1 Knock-Out Mouse Model of Autism , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Jasper Akerboom,et al.  Optimization of a GCaMP Calcium Indicator for Neural Activity Imaging , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Hongkui Zeng,et al.  Differential tuning and population dynamics of excitatory and inhibitory neurons reflect differences in local intracortical connectivity , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Deborah D. Hatton,et al.  Executive functions in young males with fragile X syndrome in comparison to mental age-matched controls: baseline findings from a longitudinal study. , 2008, Neuropsychology.

[8]  Caroline E. Robertson,et al.  Sensory perception in autism , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  K. Mullen,et al.  Differential impact of the FMR1 gene on visual processing in fragile X syndrome. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  Sander W. Keemink,et al.  Behavioral-state modulation of inhibition is context-dependent and cell type specific in mouse visual cortex , 2016, eLife.

[11]  C. Portera-Cailliau,et al.  The trouble with spines in fragile X syndrome: density, maturity and plasticity , 2013, Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Rivera,et al.  Contrast detection in infants with fragile X syndrome , 2008, Vision Research.

[13]  Giorgio La Fata,et al.  FMRP regulates multipolar to bipolar transition affecting neuronal migration and cortical circuitry , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Yang Dan,et al.  Cell-Type-Specific Activity in Prefrontal Cortex during Goal-Directed Behavior , 2015, Neuron.

[15]  J. Mallolas,et al.  Incidence of fragile X in 5,000 consecutive newborn males. , 2003, Genetic testing.

[16]  M. Sur,et al.  Response Selectivity Is Correlated to Dendritic Structure in Parvalbumin-Expressing Inhibitory Neurons in Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. D'Hooge,et al.  Fmr1 knockout mice: A model to study fragile X mental retardation , 1994, Cell.

[18]  Carlos Portera-Cailliau,et al.  A craniotomy surgery procedure for chronic brain imaging. , 2008, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[19]  Asher Mullard Fragile X disappointments upset autism ambitions , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[20]  Georg B. Keller,et al.  Learning Enhances Sensory and Multiple Non-sensory Representations in Primary Visual Cortex , 2015, Neuron.

[21]  Karel Svoboda,et al.  ScanImage: Flexible software for operating laser scanning microscopes , 2003, Biomedical engineering online.

[22]  M. Toth,et al.  Wild-Type Male Offspring of fmr-1+/− Mothers Exhibit Characteristics of the Fragile X Phenotype , 2008, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[23]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Altered Cortical Ensembles in Mouse Models of Schizophrenia , 2017, Neuron.

[24]  David H. Herman,et al.  Deficits in Tactile Learning in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  M. Carandini,et al.  Parvalbumin-Expressing Interneurons Linearly Transform Cortical Responses to Visual Stimuli , 2012, Neuron.

[26]  Carlos Portera-Cailliau,et al.  In vivo 2-photon calcium imaging in layer 2/3 of mice. , 2008, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[27]  Hongkui Zeng,et al.  A Cre-Dependent GCaMP3 Reporter Mouse for Neuronal Imaging In Vivo , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Christopher D. Harvey,et al.  Choice-specific sequences in parietal cortex during a virtual-navigation decision task , 2012, Nature.

[29]  B. Roth,et al.  Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of G protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Wesley G. Jennings,et al.  Research Note , 2017 .

[31]  M. Fagiolini,et al.  Visual evoked potentials detect cortical processing deficits in Rett syndrome , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[32]  Jeffry S. Isaacson,et al.  Network-Level Control of Frequency Tuning in Auditory Cortex , 2017, Neuron.

[33]  Carlos Portera-Cailliau,et al.  Altered Neuronal and Circuit Excitability in Fragile X Syndrome , 2015, Neuron.

[34]  Zengcai V. Guo,et al.  Flow of Cortical Activity Underlying a Tactile Decision in Mice , 2014, Neuron.

[35]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Activation of Specific Interneurons Improves V1 Feature Selectivity and Visual Perception , 2012, Nature.

[36]  J. Faubert,et al.  Integrative cortical dysfunction and pervasive motion perception deficit in fragile X syndrome , 2004, Neurology.

[37]  M. Carandini,et al.  Vision and Locomotion Shape the Interactions between Neuron Types in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2016, Neuron.

[38]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Behavioral, cognitive, and adaptive development in infants with autism spectrum disorder in the first 2 years of life , 2015, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

[39]  Stefan R. Pulver,et al.  Ultra-sensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity , 2013, Nature.

[40]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Enhanced visual search for a conjunctive target in autism: a research note. , 1998, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[41]  A. Burkhalter,et al.  Three distinct families of GABAergic neurons in rat visual cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Michael Häusser,et al.  Target-Specific Effects of Somatostatin-Expressing Interneurons on Neocortical Visual Processing , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Tiago Gonçalves,et al.  Circuit level defects in the developing neocortex of fragile X mice , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Dendritic channelopathies contribute to neocortical and sensory hyperexcitability in Fmr1−/y mice , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Dario L Ringach,et al.  Enhanced Spatial Resolution During Locomotion and Heightened Attention in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Stryker,et al.  Modulation of Visual Responses by Behavioral State in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2010, Neuron.