Reduction in Acute Morbidity Using Hypofractionated Intensity‐Modulated Radiation Therapy Assisted with a Fluoroscopic Real‐Time Tumor‐Tracking System for Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Results of a Phase I/II Study

PURPOSEThe positioning of the prostate is improved with the use of the fluoroscopic real-time tumor-tracking radiation therapy system for prostate cancer. The acute radiation reaction and preliminary tumor response of prostate cancer to hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy assisted with real-time tumortracking radiation therapy were investigated in this study. METHODSPatients were classified into prognostic risk groups on the basis of the presence of the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and histologic differentiation. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to patients in the high-risk group for 6 months before radiation therapy commenced. The intensity-modulated radiation therapy employed a segmental multileaf collimator, which generated a field made up of two or more shaped subfields using forward planning. Real-time tumor-tracking radiation therapy was used for the precise positioning of the prostate to minimize geometric uncertainties, while the dose was escalated in increments of 5 Gy from 65 Gy using a daily dose of 2.5 Gy (65 Gy/2.5 Gy), following the dose-escalation rules. Acute and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary morbidities due to radiation therapy were scored according to the toxicity criteria of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. RESULTSThirty-one patients were enrolled in this study between 1998 and 2001. Eighteen patients were classified as being members of the high-risk group. Total dose was escalated, with 65 Gy/2.5 Gy being administered to 12 patients and 70 Gy/2.5 Gy to 19 patients. The median follow-up period was 37 months (range, 30–43 months), and 19 months (range, 10–27 months), for the 65-Gy and 70-Gy arms, respectively. Patients experienced no acute toxicity and grade 1 late gastrointestinal toxicity (8.3%) in the 65-Gy/2.5-Gy arm. Patients in the 70-Gy/2.5-Gy arm experienced grade 1 acute gastrointestinal toxicity (5.3%) and grade 1 and 2 acute genitourinary toxicities (15.8%). No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (defined as a grade 3 or higher acute toxicity) or a grade 2 or higher late complication in this study period. One and two prostate-specific antigen relapses were observed in the 65-Gy and 70-Gy arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONUp to 70 Gy/2.5 Gy, equivalent to 80 Gy with a daily dose of 2.0 Gy, assuming α/β ratio of 1.5, intensity-modulated radiation therapy assisted with real-time tumor-tracking radiation therapy was administered safely with a reasonable biochemical control rate. A further dose-escalation study using this system is justifiable.

[1]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  T. Pajak,et al.  Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  B Pickett,et al.  Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions of prostate cancer to 90 Gy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  D J Brenner,et al.  Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  William R. Fair,et al.  DOSE ESCALATION WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY AFFECTS THE OUTCOME IN PROSTATE CANCER , 1998 .

[6]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. , 2001, Medical physics.

[7]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Variation in prostate position quantitation and implications for three-dimensional conformal treatment planning. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  M Kono,et al.  Intrafractional tumor position stability during computed tomography (CT)-guided frameless stereotactic radiation therapy for lung or liver cancers with a fusion of CT and linear accelerator (FOCAL) unit. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  G. Read,et al.  Retrospective study of radiotherapy in early carcinoma of the prostate. , 1989, British journal of urology.

[10]  H. Shirato,et al.  Four-dimensional treatment planning and fluoroscopic real-time tumor tracking radiotherapy for moving tumor. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  James D. Cox,et al.  Consensus statement: Guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy , 1997 .

[14]  D. Brenner Toward optimal external-beam fractionation for prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  H Shirato,et al.  Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  The relationship between technical parameters of external beam radiation therapy and complications for localized prostate cancer. , 2000, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[17]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization: acute toxicity and dose-volume analysis. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  M. Barton Tables of equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions: a simple application of the linear quadratic formula. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Rick Chappell,et al.  Is α/β for prostate tumors really low? , 2001 .

[20]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Physical aspects of a real-time tumor-tracking system for gated radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  C C Ling,et al.  High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[23]  J H Hendry,et al.  Hypofractionation for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Real-time tumour-tracking radiotherapy , 1999, The Lancet.

[25]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Ultrasound-based stereotactic guidance in prostate cancer--quantification of organ motion and set-up errors in external beam radiation therapy. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[27]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Registration accuracy and possible migration of internal fiducial gold marker implanted in prostate and liver treated with real-time tumor-tracking radiation therapy (RTRT). , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  C C Ling,et al.  Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  H. Sandler,et al.  Optimization and clinical use of multisegment intensity-modulated radiation therapy for high-dose conformal therapy. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[31]  T L Phillips,et al.  Toxicity following high-dose three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2001, Urology.

[32]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) following prostatectomy: more favorable acute genitourinary toxicity profile compared to primary IMRT for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.