Evaluation of the soft measures' effects on ambient water quality improvement and household and industry economies

Abstract Various ecological footprint calculators, carbon footprint calculators and water footprint calculators have been developed in recent years. The basic concepts of ecological behaviour record notebooks and of carbon dioxide emission calculators have been developed since the late 20th century. The first carbon dioxide emission calculator was developed in 1991. Likewise, water pollutant discharge calculators have been developed to estimate the effects of soft measures introduced into households to reduce pollutant discharge since 2004. The soft measures which have been developed in Japan may consist of a wider framework, household sustainable consumption, which has been developed in Europe, and can be referred to cleaner consumption. In this research, summarisation of the short history of ecological behaviour record notebooks and ecological footprint calculators in Japan since the 1980s was conducted, and the soft measures in households to reduce pollutant discharge were evaluated for their effects on ambient water quality improvement as well as household and industry economies. Effects of the soft measures on related industry economies were investigated using an Input–Output Table analysis and the effects of the imported goods were evaluated with an import effect matrix, which was developed in this research. The effects of the soft measures on household expenditures were estimated to be a decrease by 2.5% or USD 285 person −1  year −1 in 2003–2006. The results show that the soft measures positively affect the chemical fibre industry and significantly affect the detergent industry. Analysis of the import effect matrix proved that the six industries were tightly related through extensive amounts of imported goods. The soft measures in households may lead to household sustainable consumption and thus reduce disadvantageous human impacts on water environments. The effects of the measures introduced to improve the environment should be qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated to avoid redundant concerns and discord between the environment and the economy, which may be worried when the relationship is not well understood.

[1]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  Procedures and criteria to develop and evaluate household sustainable consumption indicators , 2012 .

[2]  Yoshiaki Tsuzuki,et al.  An index directly indicates land-based pollutant load contributions of domestic wastewater to the water pollution and its application. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Eugenio F. Carrasco,et al.  Review of corporate environmental indicators , 2011 .

[4]  Hongbin Wu,et al.  High-efficiency, environment-friendly electroluminescent polymers with stable high work function metal as a cathode: green- and yellow-emitting conjugated polyfluorene polyelectrolytes and their neutral precursors. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  Price Competition and Product Differentiation When Consumers Care for the Environment , 2003 .

[6]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  A smoke-free kitchen: initiating community based co-production for cleaner cooking and cuts in carbon emissions , 2013 .

[7]  M. Sonis,et al.  A New Image of Classical Key Sector Analysis: Minimum Information Decomposition of the Leontief Inverse , 2000 .

[8]  Michelle J. Hanson,et al.  A multivariate analysis of the energy intensity of sprawl versus compact living in the U.S. for 2003 , 2010 .

[9]  Kjartan Steen-Olsen,et al.  Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework , 2012 .

[10]  Colin Hunter,et al.  Sustainable Tourism and the Touristic Ecological Footprint , 2002 .

[11]  Bo Song,et al.  Carbon emission reduction potential of a typical household biogas system in rural China , 2013 .

[12]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Energy requirements of Sydney households , 2004 .

[13]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Maturing the New Water Management Paradigm: Progressing from Aspiration to Practice , 2011 .

[14]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of soy milk and soy burger and equivalent animal products , 2012 .

[15]  T. Wiedmann.  A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting , 2009 .

[16]  David Allaway,et al.  A consumption-based GHG inventory for the U.S. state of Oregon. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Mike Shelton,et al.  Energy Saving Trust , 2013 .

[18]  Ian Paul McCarthy,et al.  The impact of outsourcing on the transaction costs and boundaries of manufacturing , 2004 .

[19]  Linda S. Gaulke,et al.  On-site wastewater treatment and reuses in Japan , 2006 .

[20]  Shigemi Kagawa,et al.  IMPROVING THE COMPLETENESS OF PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINTS USING A GLOBAL LINK INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL: THE CASE OF JAPAN , 2009 .

[21]  Dora Marinova,et al.  Embedded carbon footprint of Chinese urban households: structure and changes , 2012 .

[22]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting , 2005 .

[23]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management , 2008 .

[24]  Yoshiaki Tsuzuki,et al.  Comparison between EAH Books of Municipal Wastewater and Carbon Dioxide , 2012 .

[25]  J. Nakajima,et al.  Performance evaluation of on-site treatment facilities for wastewater from Households, Hotels and Restaurants , 1999 .

[26]  James Reilly.  China and Japan in Myanmar: Aid, Natural Resources and Influence , 2013 .

[27]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  THE INS AND OUTS OF WATER USE – A REVIEW OF MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND WATER FOOTPRINTS FOR REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS AND POLICY , 2011 .

[28]  S. Gössling,et al.  Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability , 2002 .

[29]  W. Leontief.  Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[30]  A. Hoekstra.  Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis , 2009 .

[31]  M. Yoneda,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of effects of the soft interventions or cleaner production in households and the hard interventions: A Social Experiment Programme in a large river basin in Japan , 2012 .

[32]  Hrvoje Carić,et al.  Direct pollution cost assessment of cruising tourism in the Croatian Adriatic , 2010 .

[33]  T. Patterson,et al.  The eco-efficiency of tourism. , 2005 .

[34]  D. Fuchs,et al.  Strong sustainable consumption governance – precondition for a degrowth path? , 2013 .

[35]  Zsófia Vetőné Mózner,et al.  A consumption-based approach to carbon emission accounting – sectoral differences and environmental benefits , 2013 .

[36]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources , 2006, Science.

[37]  G. Schnabl,et al.  Monetary Policy, Vagabonding Liquidity and Bursting Bubbles in New and Emerging Markets: An Overinvestment View , 2007 .

[38]  W. Hryniuk.  More is better. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Beyond “more is better”: Ecological footprint accounting for tourism and consumption in Val di Merse, Italy , 2007 .

[40]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint , 2008 .

[41]  Giacomo D’Alisa,et al.  Household work and energy consumption: a degrowth perspective. Catalonia's case study , 2013 .

[42]  Masao Ukita,et al.  The Pollutant Load Factor of Household Wastewater in Japan , 1986 .

[43]  Hidefumi Imura,et al.  How does consumer behavior influence regional ecological footprints? An empirical analysis for Chinese regions based on the multi-region input–output model , 2011 .

[44]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  A Review of Footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability , 2012 .

[45]  Florent Vieux,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected individual diets in France: Changing the diet structure or consuming less? , 2012 .

[46]  Naota Hanasaki,et al.  An estimation of global virtual water flow and sources of water withdrawal for major crops and livestock products using a global hydrological model , 2010 .

[47]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Integrated carbon footprint and cost evaluation of a drinking water infrastructure system for screening expansion alternatives , 2012 .