Summary. A number of grading systems for assessment of facial nerve func tion using gross or regional scales have been proposed internationally. At the Consensus Meeting of Acoustic Neuroma, the discussants agreed that the House-Brackmann scale was used most widely throughout the world, the Yanagihara system was always used in Japan and in some other countries, and other systems were used only by small groups. In view of the cur rent situation, this chapter reviews the House-Brackmann scale and the Yanagihara system and describes the advantages and disadvantages of each system. The House-Brackmann grading scale is a representative gross scale that is useful for clinical purposes in general. However, all of the discuss ants agreed that the House-Brackmann scale needed to be modified to make it more relevant and reliable for assessing facial nerve function after acoustic neuroma surgery. The modification and its rationale are described. The Yanagihara system developed in Japan is a representative regional scale. The chart for obtaining the paralysis score is presented. The score provides accurate information on the grade of facial dysfunction to assess the course of recovery and to predict the outcome of the palsy. Con version between the House-Brackmann scale and the Yanagihara paralysis score is described.
[1]
L. Jongkees,et al.
The result of intratemporal treatment of facial palsy.
,
1955,
Practica oto-rhino-laryngologica.
[2]
J Kanzaki,et al.
A comparison and conversion table of 'the House-Brackmann facial nerve grading system' and 'the Yanagihara grading system'.
,
2000,
Auris, nasus, larynx.
[3]
Naoaki Yanagihara,et al.
Electrodiagnosis in facial palsy.
,
1972,
Archives of otolaryngology.
[4]
J. W. House,et al.
Facial nerve grading systems.
,
1983,
The Laryngoscope.
[5]
Nobuya Yagi,et al.
Peripheral Facial Paralysis Analysed by Integration of Conventional EMG
,
1980
.