Species traits and ecosystem characteristics affect species detection by eDNA metabarcoding in lake fish communities

[1]  S. Manel,et al.  Ecological indices from environmental DNA to contrast coastal reefs under different anthropogenic pressures , 2022, Ecology and Evolution.

[2]  S. Manel,et al.  Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding and underwater visual census to monitor tropical reef fishes , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[3]  M. Miya,et al.  An illustrated manual for environmental DNA research: Water sampling guidelines and experimental protocols , 2020 .

[4]  Merri K. Collins,et al.  Searching for a Salamander: Distribution and Habitat of the Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using eDNA as a Rapid Assessment Technique , 2019, The American Midland Naturalist.

[5]  P. Boon,et al.  Theory and practice to conserve freshwater biodiversity in the Anthropocene , 2019, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

[6]  M. Miya,et al.  Evaluation of detection probabilities at the water-filtering and initial PCR steps in environmental DNA metabarcoding using a multispecies site occupancy model , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[7]  B. Hänfling,et al.  Ground‐truthing of a fish‐based environmental DNA metabarcoding method for assessing the quality of lakes , 2019, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[8]  Hirotoshi Sato,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods , 2019, PloS one.

[9]  T. Dressler,et al.  Measuring global fish species richness with eDNA metabarcoding , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.

[10]  C. Hardy,et al.  Monitoring riverine fish communities through eDNA metabarcoding: determining optimal sampling strategies along an altitudinal and biodiversity gradient , 2018, Metabarcoding and Metagenomics.

[11]  Lynsey R. Harper,et al.  Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds , 2018, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  D. Pont,et al.  Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[13]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes. , 2018, Molecular ecology resources.

[14]  M. Miya,et al.  Comparing local‐ and regional‐scale estimations of the diversity of stream fish using eDNA metabarcoding and conventional observation methods , 2018 .

[15]  H. Doi,et al.  Water sampling for environmental DNA surveys by using an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2017 .

[16]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[17]  Hirotoshi Sato,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of sample pooling for environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish communities , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  E. Harvey,et al.  Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity , 2017, Nature Communications.

[20]  M. Miya,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Paul Nichols,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long‐term data from established survey methods , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[22]  S. Matsuzaki,et al.  Invasion of exotic piscivores causes losses of functional diversity and functionally unique species in Japanese lakes , 2016 .

[23]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information , 2016, Nature Communications.

[24]  José J Lahoz-Monfort,et al.  Statistical approaches to account for false‐positive errors in environmental DNA samples , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[25]  H. Doi,et al.  A novel environmental DNA approach to quantify the cryptic invasion of non‐native genotypes , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[26]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Next‐generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[27]  M. Kondoh,et al.  MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[28]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Special Issue Article: Environmental DNA Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA , 2015 .

[29]  C. Goldberg,et al.  Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms , 2015 .

[30]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .

[31]  Daniel E. Schindler,et al.  Prediction, precaution, and policy under global change , 2015, Science.

[32]  M. Kondoh,et al.  The Release Rate of Environmental DNA from Juvenile and Adult Fish , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  Helen C. Rees,et al.  REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA – a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology , 2014 .

[34]  Izumi Washitani,et al.  Heterogeneous distribution of a floating-leaved plant, Trapa japonica, in Lake Mikata, Japan, is determined by limitations on seed dispersal and harmful salinity levels , 2014, Ecological Research.

[35]  W. Darwall,et al.  Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism , 2013, Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology.

[36]  H. Doi,et al.  Using Environmental DNA to Estimate the Distribution of an Invasive Fish Species in Ponds , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  Z. Kawabata,et al.  Estimation of Fish Biomass Using Environmental DNA , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST , 2010, Bioinform..

[39]  D. Strayer,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[40]  P. Legendre,et al.  Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. , 2009, Ecology.

[41]  R. Knight,et al.  Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex , 2008, Nature Methods.

[42]  Michael L. Pace,et al.  Ecosystem size determines food-chain length in lakes , 2022 .

[43]  Anders N. Nilsson,et al.  Abundance and species richness patterns of predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) in Swedish lakes , 1994 .

[44]  H. Doi,et al.  Environmental DNA analysis for estimating the abundance and biomass of stream fish , 2017 .

[45]  D. Edwards,et al.  How Should Beta-Diversity Inform Biodiversity Conservation? , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.