A variational model for 3D tolerance analysis with manufacturing signature and operating conditions

Purpose The purpose of this work is to present a variational model able to deal with form tolerances and assembly conditions. The variational model is one of the methods proposed in literature for tolerance analysis, but it cannot deal with form tolerances and assembly conditions that may influence the functional requirements of mechanical assemblies. Design/methodology/approach This work shows how to manage the actual surfaces generated by the manufacturing process and the operating conditions inside the variational model that has been modified to integrate the manufacturing signature left on the surfaces of the parts and the operating conditions that arise during an actual assembly, such as gravity and friction. Moreover, a geometrical model was developed to numerically simulate what happens in a real assembly process and to give a reference value. Findings The new variational model was applied to a three-dimensional case study. The obtained results were compared to those of the geometrical model and to those of the variational model to validate the new model and to show the improvements. Research limitations/implications The proposed approach may be extended to other models of literature. However, its limitation is that it is able to deal with a sphere–plane contact. Practical implications Tolerance analysis is a valid tool to foresee geometric interferences among the components of an assembly before getting the physical assembly. It involves a decrease in the manufacturing costs. Originality/value The main contributions of the study are the insertion of a systematic pattern characterizing the features manufactured by a process, assembly operating conditions and development of a geometrical model to reproduce what happens in a real assembly process.

[1]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  Quick GPS: A new CAT system for single-part tolerancing , 2010, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Quirico Semeraro,et al.  Critical operating conditions for assemblies with parameter-dependent dimensions , 2013 .

[3]  Hua Chen,et al.  A comprehensive study of three dimensional tolerance analysis methods , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[4]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  From solid modelling to skin model shapes: Shifting paradigms in computer-aided tolerancing , 2014 .

[5]  Quirico Semeraro,et al.  Process Signature Modeling for Tolerance Analysis , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[6]  Wilma Polini Taxonomy of models for tolerance analysis in assembling , 2012 .

[7]  Pierre-Antoine Adragna,et al.  Modeling of 2D and 3D Assemblies Taking Into Account Form Errors of Plane Surfaces , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[8]  Joshua U. Turner,et al.  Variational solid modeling for tolerance analysis , 1993, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[9]  Chaowang Bo,et al.  A comparison of tolerance analysis models for assembly , 2013 .

[10]  Giovanni Moroni,et al.  3D Tolerance Analysis with Manufacturing Signature and Operating Conditions , 2016 .

[11]  Wilma Polini,et al.  Geometric Tolerance Analysis , 2011 .

[12]  M. Boyer,et al.  Modeling Spaces for Toleranced Objects , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[14]  Gaurav Ameta,et al.  Comparison of Spatial Math Models for Tolerance Analysis: Tolerance-Maps, Deviation Domain, and TTRS , 2011, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[15]  Yao Zhenqiang,et al.  Integrating cylindricity error into tolerance analysis of precision rotary assemblies using Jacobian–Torsor model , 2013 .

[16]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Skin Model Shapes: A new paradigm shift for geometric variations modelling in mechanical engineering , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[17]  Giovanni Moroni,et al.  Tolerance-based Variations in Solid Modeling , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[18]  Massimiliano Marziale,et al.  Tolerance Analysis: A New Model Based on Variational Solid Modelling , 2010 .