Gross Motor Function Classification System and outcome tools for assessing ambulatory cerebral palsy: a multicenter study

The relationships between different levels of severity of ambulatory cerebral palsy, defined by the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and several pediatric outcome instruments were examined. Data from the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Pediatric Orthopaedic Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), temporal‐spatial gait parameters, and oxygen cost were collected from six sites. The sample size for each assessment tool ranged from 226 to 1047 participants. There were significant differences among GMFCS levels I, II, and III for many of the outcome tools assessed in this study. Strong correlations were seen between GMFCS level and each of the GMFM sections D and E scores, the PODCI measures of Transfer and Mobility, and Sports and Physical Function, Gait Velocity, and Oxygen Cost. Correlations among tools demonstrated that the GMFM sections D and E scores correlated with the largest number of other tools. Logistic regression showed GMFM section E score to be a significant predictor of GMFCS level. GMFM section E score can be used to predict GMFCS level relatively accurately (76.6%). Study data indicate that the assessed outcome tools can distinguish between children with different GMFCS levels. This study establishes justification for using the GMFCS as a classification system in clinical studies.

[1]  D. Sutherland,et al.  Relationships Among Musculoskeletal Impairments and Functional Health Status in Ambulatory Cerebral Palsy , 2003, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[2]  P. Raina,et al.  Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. , 2002, JAMA.

[3]  M. Mccarthy,et al.  Comparing reliability and validity of pediatric instruments for measuring health and well-being of children with spastic cerebral palsy. , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[4]  Parminder Raina,et al.  Health status of school‐aged children with cerebral palsy: information from a population‐based sample , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[5]  R. Tervo,et al.  Correlation between physical functioning and gait measures in children with cerebral palsy. , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[6]  D. A. Cioffi,et al.  The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Outcomes Instruments: Normative Values from the General Population , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  R. Haynes,et al.  The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Pediatric Orthopaedic Functional Health Questionnaire: An Analysis of Normals , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[8]  G. Hagberg,et al.  Correlation between ICIDH handicap code and Gross Motor Function Classification System in children with cerebral palsy , 2000, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  P. Raina,et al.  Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[10]  P. Raina,et al.  Improved scaling of the gross motor function measure for children with cerebral palsy: evidence of reliability and validity. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[11]  E. Wood,et al.  The Gross Motor Function Classification System for Cerebral Palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time , 2000, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  M H Liang,et al.  The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Pediatric Outcomes Instrument Development Group. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. , 1998, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[13]  M. Abel,et al.  Functional outcomes of strength training in spastic cerebral palsy. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  C. Granger,et al.  Interrater agreement and stability of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM): use in children with developmental disabilities. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Palisano,et al.  Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy , 1997, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[16]  G. Hägglund,et al.  Reliability of the gross motor function measure in cerebral palsy. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  C. Richards,et al.  CORRECTION BETWEEN THE GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION MEASURE SCORES AND GAIT SPATIOTEMPORAL MEASURES IN CHILDREN WITH NEUROLOGICAL IMPAIRMENTS , 1996, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[18]  C. Granger,et al.  THE STABILITY AND EQUIVALENCE RELIABILITY OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE FOR CHILDREN (WeeFIM)® , 1996, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[19]  M. Abel,et al.  Relation Of Gait Analysis To Gross Motor Function In Cerebral Palsy , 1996, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  The Gross Motor Performance Measure: Validity and Responsiveness of a Measure of Quality of Movement , 1995, Physical therapy.

[21]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Reliability of Gross Motor Performance Measure , 1995, Physical therapy.

[22]  E Jankowicz,et al.  [Classification of cerebral palsy]. , 1967, Polski tygodnik lekarski.

[23]  Serafino Buono,et al.  ICF- INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH , 2003 .

[24]  J. Varni,et al.  The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision-making. , 2002, Journal of behavioral medicine.

[25]  J. Hoenig,et al.  Statistical Practice The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis , 2001 .

[26]  R. Tervo,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire as an outcome measure in children with walking disabilities. , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[27]  M. Msall,et al.  Measurements of functional outcomes in children with cerebral palsy , 1997 .