Cefixime allows greater dose escalation of oral irinotecan: a phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE Irinotecan is active against a variety of malignancies; however, severe diarrhea limits its usefulness. In our phase I study, the intravenous formulation of irinotecan was administered orally daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (repeated every 21 days) to children with refractory solid tumors. Our objectives were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of oral irinotecan and to evaluate whether coadministration of cefixime (8 mg/kg/d beginning 5 days before irinotecan and continuing throughout the course) ameliorates irinotecan-induced diarrhea. PATIENTS AND METHODS In separate cohorts, irinotecan doses were escalated from 15 to 45 mg/m2/d without cefixime and then from 45 to 60 and 75 mg/m2/d with cefixime. RESULTS Without cefixime, diarrhea was dose limiting at irinotecan 45 mg/m2/d. Myelotoxicity was not significant at any dose. The MTD was 40 mg/m2/d without cefixime but 60 mg/m2/d with cefixime. Systemic exposure to SN-38 at the MTD was significantly higher with cefixime than without cefixime (mean SN-38 area under the curve: 19.5 ng x h/mL; standard deviation [SD], 6.8 ng x h/mL v 10.4 ng x h/mL; SD, 4.3 ng x h/mL, respectively; P = .030). CONCLUSION Cefixime administered with oral irinotecan is well tolerated in children and allows greater dose escalation of irinotecan. Because diarrhea is a major adverse effect of both intravenous and oral irinotecan, further evaluation of the use of cefixime to ameliorate this adverse effect is warranted.

[1]  J. Kuttesch,et al.  A phase I study of irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule in pediatric patients , 2006, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[2]  J. Schellens,et al.  Phase I study of an oral formulation of irinotecan administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours , 2005, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[3]  P. Beroza,et al.  Discovery of novel selective inhibitors of human intestinal carboxylesterase for the amelioration of irinotecan-induced diarrhea: synthesis, quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis, and biological activity. , 2004, Molecular pharmacology.

[4]  R. Danesi,et al.  A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irinotecan Given as a 7-Day Continuous Infusion in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Pretreated with 5-Fluorouracil or Raltitrexed , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  P. Houghton,et al.  Phase I Trial of Temozolomide and Protracted Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  D. Frappaz,et al.  A phase I study of irinotecan as a 3-week schedule in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[8]  H. Dodds,et al.  High-performance liquid chromatographic assay with fluorescence detection for the simultaneous measurement of carboxylate and lactone forms of irinotecan and three metabolites in human plasma. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[9]  A. Vecchione,et al.  Prevention of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-induced diarrhoea by oral administration of neomycin plus bacitracin in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  G. Fiorentini,et al.  Potential use of imatinib mesylate in ocular melanoma and liposarcoma expressing immunohistochemical c-KIT (CD117). , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  K. Mori,et al.  Preventive effect of Kampo medicine (Hangeshashin-to) against irinotecan-induced diarrhea in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer , 2003, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[12]  Guoyong Jiang,et al.  Likelihood Analysis for the Ratio of Means of Two Independent Log‐Normal Distributions , 2002, Biometrics.

[13]  J. Supko,et al.  Current perspectives on the clinical experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the camptothecins. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[14]  W. Gerald,et al.  Irinotecan for Pediatric Solid Tumors: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Experience , 2002, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[15]  S. Suita,et al.  Phase I Study of Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Malignant Solid Tumors , 2002, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[16]  W M Tierney,et al.  Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  J. Verweij,et al.  Modulation of irinotecan-induced diarrhea by cotreatment with neomycin in cancer patients. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[18]  S. Kudoh,et al.  Prevention of irinotecan (CPT‐11)‐induced diarrhea by oral alkalization combined with control of defecation in cancer patients , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[19]  L. Saltz,et al.  Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  C. Morton,et al.  Proficient metabolism of irinotecan by a human intestinal carboxylesterase. , 2000, Cancer research.

[21]  M. Hauer-Jensen,et al.  Effect of thalidomide on gastrointestinal toxic effects of irinotecan , 2000, The Lancet.

[22]  J. Sloan,et al.  Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) using a once-every-three-week dosing schedule for patients with advanced solid tumor malignancy. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[23]  S. Arbuck,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of irinotecan administered as a 96-hour infusion weekly to adult cancer patients. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  T. Loeffler,et al.  Substantial activity of budesonide in patients with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil induced diarrhea and failure of loperamide treatment. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  P. Houghton,et al.  Direct translation of a protracted irinotecan schedule from a xenograft model to a phase I trial in children. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  P. Houghton,et al.  Efficacy of systemic administration of irinotecan against neuroblastoma xenografts. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[28]  P. Hérait,et al.  High dose-intensity of irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in advanced cancer patients: a feasibility study. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  E. Rowinsky,et al.  The clinical status of irinotecan (CPT-11), a novel water soluble camptothecin analogue: 1996. , 1996, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[30]  M Nomura,et al.  Involvement of beta-glucuronidase in intestinal microflora in the intestinal toxicity of the antitumor camptothecin derivative irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats. , 1996, Cancer research.

[31]  G. Itokazu,et al.  Comparison of Cefprozil, Cefpodoxime Proxetil, Loracarbef, Cefixime, and Ceftibuten , 1996, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[32]  H. Soda,et al.  Irinotecan (CPT-11) and characteristic mucosal changes in the mouse ileum and cecum. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  P. Diggle Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 1995 .

[34]  A. Gouyette,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered daily for three consecutive days every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. , 1995, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[35]  M. D. Del Beccaro,et al.  Comparison of cefpodoxime proxetil and cefixime in the treatment of acute otitis media in infants and children. Otitis Study Group. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[36]  S. Culine,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the camptothecin derivative irinotecan, administered on a weekly schedule in cancer patients. , 1994, Cancer research.

[37]  P. Hérait,et al.  Irinotecan (CPT-11) high-dose escalation using intensive high-dose loperamide to control diarrhea. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[38]  L. Grochow,et al.  Phase I and pharmacological study of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) administered as a ninety-minute infusion every 3 weeks. , 1994, Cancer research.

[39]  G. Weiss,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly CPT-11. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  P. Houghton,et al.  Therapeutic efficacy of the topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-(4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino)-carbonyloxy-camptothecin against human tumor xenografts: lack of cross-resistance in vivo in tumors with acquired resistance to the topoisomerase I inhibitor 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin. , 1993, Cancer research.

[41]  R. Desjardins,et al.  Safety profile of cefixime. , 1987, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[42]  P. Houghton,et al.  Efficacy of topoisomerase I inhibitors, topotecan and irinotecan, administered at low dose levels in protracted schedules to mice bearing xenografts of human tumors , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[43]  Kensuke Matsumoto,et al.  Antitumor activity of a camptothecin derivative, CPT-11, against human tumor xenografts in nude mice , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[44]  M. Bernstein,et al.  A phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients: a pediatric oncology group study. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[45]  T. Kamataki,et al.  Inhibition of intestinal microflora β-glucuronidase modifies the distribution of the active metabolite of the antitumor agent, irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats , 1998, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[46]  J. Verweij,et al.  Topoisomerase I inhibitors: the relevance of prolonged exposure for present clinical development. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.