Validation of volumetric error compensation for a five-axis machine using surface mismatch producing tests and on-machine touch probing

Abstract In order to validate volumetric error compensation methods for five-axis machine tools, the machining of test parts has been proposed. For such tests, a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) or other external measurement, outside of the machine tool, is required to measure the accuracy of the machined part. In this paper, a series of machining tests are proposed to validate a compensation strategy and compare the machining accuracy before and after the compensation using only on-machine measurements. The basis of the tests is to machine slots, each completed using two different rotary axes indexations of the CNC machine tool. Using directional derivatives of the volumetric errors, it is possible to verify that a surface mismatch is produced between the two halves of the same slot in the presence of specific machine geometric errors. The mismatch at the both sides of the slot, which materializes the machine volumetric errors is measured using touch probing by the erroneous machine itself and with high accuracy since the measurement of both slot halves can be conducted using a single set of rotary axes indexation and in a volumetric region of a few millimetres. The effect of a compensation strategy is then validated by comparing the surface mismatch value for compensated and uncompensated slots.

[1]  R. Paul,et al.  Kinematic control equations for simple manipulators , 1978, 1978 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[2]  Sylvain Lavernhe,et al.  Evaluation of servo, geometric and dynamic error sources on five axis high-speed machine tool , 2011, ArXiv.

[3]  Yuan Kang,et al.  An efficient error compensation system for CNC multi-axis machines , 2002 .

[4]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Theory and simulation for the identification of the link geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool using a telescoping magnetic ball-bar , 2002 .

[5]  Li Zhuang,et al.  Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools , 2012 .

[6]  J.R.R. Mayer,et al.  Single setup estimation of a five-axis machine tool eight link errors by programmed end point constraint and on the fly measurement with Capball sensor , 2009 .

[7]  M. A. Donmez,et al.  A general methodology for machine tool accuracy enhancement by error compensation , 1986 .

[8]  J. Jung,et al.  Machining accuracy enhancement by compensating for volumetric errors of a machine tool and on-machine measurement , 2006 .

[9]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Prediction and compensation of machining geometric errors of five-axis machining centers with kinematic errors , 2009 .

[10]  Wuyi Chen,et al.  A methodology for systematic geometric error compensation in five-axis machine tools , 2011 .

[11]  R.M.D. Mahbubur,et al.  Positioning accuracy improvement in five-axis milling by post processing , 1997 .

[12]  M A. Donmez,et al.  Evaluation of Proposed Test Artifacts for Five-Axis Machine Tools | NIST , 2011 .

[13]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Machining tests to identify kinematic errors on five-axis machine tools , 2010 .

[14]  W. T. Lei,et al.  Accuracy enhancement of five-axis CNC machines through real-time error compensation , 2003 .