Surface map comparison: studying function diversity of homologous proteins.

A simplified protein surface cartography approach has been developed to assist in the analysis of surface features in homologous families, and thus to predict conservation or divergence of protein functions and protein-protein interaction patterns. A spherical approximation of protein surface was used, with a focus on charged and hydrophobic residues. The resulting surface map allows for qualitative analysis and comparison of surfaces of proteins, but can also be used to define a simple numerical measure of map similarity between two or more proteins. The latter was shown to be useful for function based classifications within large protein families. Surface map analysis was tested on several test cases: haemoglobins, death domains and TRAF domains. It was shown that surface map comparison allows a better function prediction than general sequence analysis methods and can reproduce known examples of functional variation within a divergent group of proteins. In another example, we predict novel, unexpected sets of common functional properties for seemingly distant members of a large group of divergent proteins. The method was also shown to be robust enough to allow using protein models from comparative modelling instead of experimental structures.

[1]  T J Macke,et al.  Interactive modeling of supramolecular assemblies. , 1998, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[2]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Comparative modeling of CASP3 targets using PSI‐BLAST and SCWRL , 1999, Proteins.

[3]  C. Thompson,et al.  Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs)--a family of adapter proteins that regulates life and death. , 1998, Genes & development.

[4]  S. Jones,et al.  Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  B. Rost,et al.  Adaptation of protein surfaces to subcellular location. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  R. Orlowski The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in apoptosis , 1999, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[7]  M Nayal,et al.  Grass: A server for the graphical representation and analysis of structures , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  M Paoli,et al.  The stereochemical mechanism of the cooperative effects in hemoglobin revisited. , 1998, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[9]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  D. Ringe,et al.  Analysis of the binding surfaces of proteins , 1999, Medicinal research reviews.

[11]  A Caflisch,et al.  Hydrophobicity at the surface of proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[12]  R Abagyan,et al.  The contour-buildup algorithm to calculate the analytical molecular surface. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  D. Stuart,et al.  Analysis of antigenic surfaces of proteins , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  A. Olson,et al.  Shape analysis of molecular surfaces , 1993, Biopolymers.

[16]  A. Bairoch PROSITE: a dictionary of sites and patterns in proteins. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  G Schreiber,et al.  Stability and function: two constraints in the evolution of barstar and other proteins. , 1994, Structure.

[18]  G Schneider,et al.  Mapping of protein surface cavities and prediction of enzyme class by a self-organizing neural network. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[19]  P. Bucher,et al.  The CARD domain: a new apoptotic signalling motif. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[20]  R A Sayle,et al.  RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  D. Pellman,et al.  Deubiquitinating enzymes: a new class of biological regulators. , 1998, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[22]  J Skolnick,et al.  Functional analysis of the Escherichia coli genome using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm: identification of proteins exhibiting the glutaredoxin/thioredoxin disulfide oxidoreductase activity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  R. Norel,et al.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  A Godzik,et al.  Structural diversity in a family of homologous proteins. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  M. Riley,et al.  Systems for categorizing functions of gene products. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  S. Jones,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Patrice Koehl,et al.  The ASTRAL compendium for protein structure and sequence analysis , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  A. Sali,et al.  Structural genomics: beyond the Human Genome Project , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Y. Chirgadze,et al.  Spatial sign-alternating charge clusters in globular proteins. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[30]  A. Murzin How far divergent evolution goes in proteins. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[31]  Jeffrey M. Friedman,et al.  Interconversion Between 3D Molecular Representations: Some Macromolecular Applications of Spherical Harmonic-Bessel Expansions about an Arbitrary Center , 1999, Comput. Chem..

[32]  A. Sali,et al.  Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D. Goeddel,et al.  A novel family of putative signal transducers associated with the cytoplasmic domain of the 75 kDa tumor necrosis factor receptor , 1994, Cell.

[34]  A. Godzik,et al.  Sensitive sequence comparison as protein function predictor. , 1999, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[35]  D. Fairlie,et al.  Towards protein surface mimetics. , 1998, Current medicinal chemistry.

[36]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  A. Olson,et al.  Approximation and characterization of molecular surfaces , 1993, Biopolymers.

[38]  K. Hofmann,et al.  The modular nature of apoptotic signaling proteins , 1999, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[39]  D. Vaux,et al.  TRAF proteins and meprins share a conserved domain. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[40]  R C Wade,et al.  MolSurfer: two-dimensional maps for navigating three-dimensional structures of proteins. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[41]  J. Holton,et al.  Crystallographic analysis of CD40 recognition and signaling by human TRAF2. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  M. L. Connolly Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[46]  Chris Sander,et al.  The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  A. Godzik,et al.  Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  Molecular cartography of proteins: surface relief analysis of the calf eye lens protein gamma-crystallin. , 1989, Protein engineering.

[49]  C. Chothia,et al.  Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Hao Wu,et al.  Structural basis for self-association and receptor recognition of human TRAF2 , 1999, Nature.

[51]  E. Koonin,et al.  The domains of death: evolution of the apoptosis machinery. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[52]  M. Helmer-Citterich,et al.  Three-dimensional profiles: a new tool to identify protein surface similarities. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  L Rychlewski,et al.  From fold predictions to function predictions: Automation of functional site conservation analysis for functional genome predictions , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[54]  R. Treisman,et al.  The POZ domain: a conserved protein-protein interaction motif. , 1994, Genes & development.

[55]  W. Hendrickson,et al.  Quantification of tertiary structural conservation despite primary sequence drift in the globin fold , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.