Empowering patients with essential information and communication support in the context of diabetes

OBJECTIVES Patients with diabetes need to be aware of essential information to be involved in decision-making, manage diabetes properly, and communicate with doctors and other healthcare providers effectively. We have developed Violet Technology (VT) to provide features beyond previous health information tailoring systems by dynamically prioritizing diabetes learning topics and providing integrated direct support for patient-provider communication through formulation of individualized agendas to take to healthcare encounters. METHODS A particular feature of the VT approach is a Diabetes Information Profile (DIP) that models psychosocial and educational exposure features, as well as clinical characteristics, and considers expressed patient information preferences and recent information browsing history. The agenda facility recommends questions that the patients may have based on their profile, as well as helping to initialize a patient empowerment protocol. The technology uses a modular and extensible approach for key components, including consumer health information, prioritization rules, and methods of instantiating the DIP. VT has been implemented into a web portal for patient use. Two phases of evaluation studies have been conducted to collect patient and healthcare provider feedback. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Results indicate that VT prioritizes relevant and important information for individual patients. Moreover, both patients and providers indicate that formulating an agenda of questions is important for patients. More extensive system use is needed to establish if the technology can deliver an improved patient-provider partnership and, ultimately, improved health outcomes.

[1]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Research Paper: Patient Internet Use for Health Information at Three Urban Primary Care Clinics , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Ehud Reiter,et al.  Lessons from a failure: Generating tailored smoking cessation letters , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Robert M. Anderson,et al.  Empowerment and Self-Management of Diabetes , 2004 .

[5]  C. Charles,et al.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Licia Calvi,et al.  Proficiency-Adapted Information Browsing and Filtering in Hypermedia Educational Systems , 1997, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[7]  Syed S. Ali,et al.  Application of Technology: Interactive Computerized Health Care Education , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Kate Lorig,et al.  Patient Education: A Practical Approach , 1992 .

[9]  Cathy Charles,et al.  How to improve communication between doctors and patients , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Robert M. Anderson,et al.  Working toward the next generation of diabetes self-management education. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Designing computer-based frameworks that facilitate doctor-patient collaboration , 1998, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[13]  Robert M. Anderson,et al.  Implementing an Empowerment-Based Diabetes Self-management Education Program , 2005, The Diabetes educator.

[14]  C P Bradley,et al.  Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Charles Safran,et al.  Reinventing Patient-centered Computing for the Twenty-first Century , 2001, MedInfo.

[16]  Sally H. Rankin,et al.  Patient Education: Issues, Principles, Practices , 1990 .

[17]  Deborah Lewis,et al.  Review: Computer-based Approaches to Patient Education: A Review of the Literature , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Peretz Shoval,et al.  Stereotypes in Information Filtering Systems , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Samina Raza Abidi,et al.  Patient Empowerment via 'Pushed' Delivery of Personalised Healthcare Educational Content Over the Internet , 2001, MedInfo.

[20]  Garry Welch,et al.  Supporting Lifestyle Change With a Computerized Psychosocial Assessment Tool , 2002 .

[21]  S. Dunn,et al.  Patient psychological and information needs when the diagnosis is diabetes. , 1996, Patient education and counseling.

[22]  R. Street,et al.  Provider-Patient Communication and Metabolic Control , 1993, Diabetes Care.

[23]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  An intelligent interactive system for delivering individualized information to patients , 1995, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[24]  Paul Little,et al.  Importance of patient pressure and perceived pressure and perceived medical need for investigations, referral, and prescribing in primary care: nested observational study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  C. Pooley,et al.  'Oh it's a wonderful practice... you can talk to them': a qualitative study of patients' and health professionals' views on the management of type 2 diabetes. , 2001, Health & social care in the community.

[26]  Robert M. Anderson,et al.  The Problem With Compliance in Diabetes , 2000 .