Improving global mass flux solutions from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) through forward modeling and continuous time correlation

[1] We describe Earth's mass flux from April 2003 through November 2008 by deriving a time series of mascons on a global 2° × 2° equal-area grid at 10 day intervals. We estimate the mass flux directly from K band range rate (KBRR) data provided by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission. Using regularized least squares, we take into account the underlying process dynamics through continuous space and time-correlated constraints. In addition, we place the mascon approach in the context of other filtering techniques, showing its equivalence to anisotropic, nonsymmetric filtering, least squares collocation, and Kalman smoothing. We produce mascon time series from KBRR data that have and have not been corrected (forward modeled) for hydrological processes and find that the former produce superior results in oceanic areas by minimizing signal leakage from strong sources on land. By exploiting the structure of the spatiotemporal constraints, we are able to use a much more efficient (in storage and computation) inversion algorithm based upon the conjugate gradient method. This allows us to apply continuous rather than piecewise continuous time-correlated constraints, which we show via global maps and comparisons with ocean-bottom pressure gauges, to produce time series with reduced random variance and full systematic signal. Finally, we present a preferred global model, a hybrid whose oceanic portions are derived using forward modeling of hydrology but whose land portions are not, and thus represent a pure GRACE-derived signal.

[1]  Rob S. MacLeod,et al.  Inverse electrocardiography by simultaneous imposition of multiple constraints , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  B. Chao,et al.  Snow load effect on the Earth's rotation and gravitational field, 1979–1985 , 1987 .

[3]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[4]  Yiheng Zhang,et al.  An analytical comparison of three spatio-temporal regularization methods for dynamic linear inverse problems in a common statistical framework , 2005 .

[5]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Global Mass Flux Solutions from GRACE: A Comparison of Parameter Estimation Strategies - Mass Concentrations Versus Stokes Coefficients , 2010 .

[6]  H. Moritz Advanced Physical Geodesy , 1980 .

[7]  Marie Drevillon,et al.  Global Ocean Reanalysis Simulations at Mercator Ocan GLORYS1: the Argo years 2002-2009 , 2009 .

[8]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[9]  Florent Lyard,et al.  Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing ‐ comparisons with observations , 2003 .

[10]  D. Rowlands,et al.  Short-arc analysis of intersatellite tracking data in a gravity mapping mission , 2002 .

[11]  R. Ray,et al.  Barometric Tides from ECMWF Operational Analyses , 2003 .

[12]  S. Swenson,et al.  Methods for inferring regional surface‐mass anomalies from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measurements of time‐variable gravity , 2002 .

[13]  Richard D. Ray,et al.  A Global Ocean Tide Model From TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimetry: GOT99.2 , 1999 .

[14]  James Demmel,et al.  Applied Numerical Linear Algebra , 1997 .

[15]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[16]  D. Chambers,et al.  GRACE observes small‐scale mass loss in Greenland , 2008 .

[17]  W. Briggs Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[18]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  Low degree spherical harmonic influences on Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) water storage estimates , 2005 .

[19]  R. Nerem,et al.  Recent Greenland Ice Mass Loss by Drainage System from Satellite Gravity Observations , 2006, Science.

[20]  J. Kusche Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models , 2007 .

[21]  Don P. Chambers,et al.  Observing seasonal steric sea level variations with GRACE and satellite altimetry , 2006 .

[22]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Monthly spherical harmonic gravity field solutions determined from GRACE inter‐satellite range‐rate data alone , 2006 .

[23]  Hanoch Lev-Ari,et al.  Efficient solution of linear matrix equations with application to multistatic antenna array processing , 2005, Commun. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[25]  A. Eicker,et al.  Deriving daily snapshots of the Earth's gravity field from GRACE L1B data using Kalman filtering , 2009 .

[26]  M. Schervish,et al.  Prior information in linear models , 1983 .

[27]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[28]  J. Wahr,et al.  Acceleration of Greenland ice mass loss in spring 2004 , 2006, Nature.

[29]  Alan J. Laub,et al.  Matrix analysis - for scientists and engineers , 2004 .

[30]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Applied Optimal Estimation , 1974 .

[31]  D. Rowlands,et al.  Recent glacier mass changes in the Gulf of Alaska region from GRACE mascon solutions , 2008, Journal of Glaciology.

[32]  F. LeMoine,et al.  Resolving mass flux at high spatial and temporal resolution using GRACE intersatellite measurements , 2005 .

[33]  M. Zhong,et al.  Improved inverse and probabilistic methods for geophysical applications of GRACE gravity data , 2009 .

[34]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  The design of an optimal filter for monthly GRACE gravity models , 2008 .