A Straightforward Approach for 3D Bacterial Printing

Sustainable and personally tailored materials production is an emerging challenge to society. Living organisms can produce and pattern an extraordinarily wide range of different molecules in a sustainable way. These natural systems offer an abundant source of inspiration for the development of new environmentally friendly materials production techniques. In this paper, we describe the first steps toward the 3-dimensional printing of bacterial cultures for materials production and patterning. This methodology combines the capability of bacteria to form new materials with the reproducibility and tailored approach of 3D printing systems. For this purpose, a commercial 3D printer was modified for bacterial systems, and new alginate-based bioink chemistry was developed. Printing temperature, printhead speed, and bioink extrusion rate were all adapted and customized to maximize bacterial health and spatial resolution of printed structures. Our combination of 3D printing technology with biological systems enables a sustainable approach for the production of numerous new materials.

[1]  P. Ma,et al.  Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[2]  G. Verbruggen,et al.  Culture of chondrocytes in alginate surrounded by fibrin gel: characteristics of the cells over a period of eight weeks , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  Andreas Gebhardt,et al.  Rapid prototyping , 2003 .

[4]  Stuart K Williams,et al.  Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating viable tissue-engineered constructs. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[5]  Steven S. Vogel,et al.  Cerulean, Venus, and VenusY67C FRET reference standards. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[6]  C. Williams,et al.  Bacterial synthesis of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[7]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[8]  Víctor Jiménez.  RAPID Prototyping Technology , 2010 .

[9]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic three-color scaffold for monitoring genetic regulation and noise , 2010, Journal of biological engineering.

[10]  D. Groleau,et al.  Introducing a new Bioengineered Bug: Methylobacterium extorquens tuned as a microbial bioplastic factory , 2011, Bioengineered bugs.

[11]  Xiaofeng Cui,et al.  Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. , 2012, Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation.

[12]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[13]  J. Shear,et al.  3D printing of microscopic bacterial communities , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Drew Endy,et al.  Amplifying Genetic Logic Gates , 2013, Science.

[15]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Genomic Mining of Prokaryotic Repressors for Orthogonal Logic Gates , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[16]  Howard J. Li,et al.  Rapid and tunable post-translational coupling of genetic circuits , 2014, Nature.

[17]  Robert J Citorik,et al.  Synthesis and patterning of tunable multiscale materials with engineered cells , 2014, Nature materials.

[18]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Deok‐Ho Kim,et al.  Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink , 2014, Nature Communications.

[20]  T. Lu,et al.  Strong underwater adhesives made by self-assembling multi-protein nanofibres. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[21]  D. Cho,et al.  Biomimetic 3D tissue printing for soft tissue regeneration. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[22]  T. Hiraishi.  Poly(aspartic acid) (PAA) hydrolases and PAA biodegradation: current knowledge and impact on applications , 2015, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[23]  Youngjae Yoo,et al.  Reduction of graphene oxide/alginate composite hydrogels for enhanced adsorption of hydrophobic compounds , 2015, Nanotechnology.

[24]  David D. Hernandez,et al.  Factors Affecting Dimensional Precision of Consumer 3D Printing , 2015 .

[25]  A. Potthast,et al.  Bacterial cellulose as a material for wound treatment: Properties and modifications. A review. , 2015, Biotechnology advances.

[26]  Ilja Westerlaken,et al.  The DNA-Binding Protein from Starved Cells (Dps) Utilizes Dual Functions To Defend Cells against Multiple Stresses , 2015, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  Bharat Rao,et al.  3D printing: On its historical evolution and the implications for business , 2015, 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).

[28]  A. Perriman,et al.  3D Bioprinting Using a Templated Porous Bioink , 2016, Advanced healthcare materials.

[29]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  xPrint: A Modularized Liquid Printer for Smart Materials Deposition , 2016, CHI.

[30]  A. Meyer,et al.  Using bacteria to make improved, nacre-inspired materials , 2016 .