Learning from avatars: Learning assistants practice physics pedagogy in a classroom simulator

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Preparing and Supporting University Physics Educators.] Undergraduate students are increasingly being used to support course transformations that incorporate research-based instructional strategies. While such students are typically selected based on strong content knowledge and possible interest in teaching, they often do not have previous pedagogical training. The current trainingmodelsmake use of real students or classmates role playing as students as the test subjects.We present a new environment for facilitating the practice of physics pedagogy skills, a highly immersive mixed-reality classroom simulator, and assess its effectiveness for undergraduate physics learning assistants (LAs). LAs prepared, taught, and reflected on a lesson about motion graphs for five highly interactive computer generated student avatars in the mixed-reality classroom simulator. To assess the effectiveness of the simulator for this population,we analyzed the pedagogical skills LAs intended to practice and exhibited during their lessons and explored LAs’ descriptions of their experiences with the simulator. Our results indicate that the classroom simulator created a safe, effective environment forLAs to practice a variety of skills, such as questioning styles and wait time. Additionally, our analysis revealed areas for improvement in our preparation of LAs and use of the simulator. We conclude with a summary of research questions this environment could facilitate.

[1]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Preparation of High School Physics Teachers. , 2010 .

[2]  Hyo-Jeong So,et al.  Technology's Role in Field Experiences for Preservice Teacher Training , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  L. Shulman Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 2013 .

[4]  Renee Michelle Goertzen,et al.  Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning , 2010 .

[5]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics , 1994 .

[6]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Ed Zintel,et al.  Resources , 1998, IT Prof..

[8]  Chris Dede,et al.  Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning , 2009, Science.

[9]  Raymond L. Pecheone,et al.  Gathering Feedback for Teaching Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains , 2012 .

[10]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Accounting for tutorial teaching assistants' buy-in to reform instruction , 2009 .

[11]  Hilary A. Dwyer,et al.  Potential Teachers' Appropriate and Inappropriate Application of Pedagogical Resources in a Model-Based Physics Course: A "Knowledge in Pieces" Perspective on Teacher Learning. , 2013 .

[12]  Warren M. Christensen,et al.  Preparing future teachers to anticipate student difficulties in physics in a graduate-level course in physics, pedagogy, and education research , 2011 .

[13]  Francesca M. Forzani,et al.  The Work of Teaching and the Challenge for Teacher Education , 2009 .

[14]  James M. Wood,et al.  Understanding and Computing Cohen’s Kappa: A Tutorial. , 2007 .

[15]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Teacher Questioning to Elicit Students’ Mathematical Thinking in Elementary School Classrooms , 2009 .

[16]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Applications of simulated students: an exploration , 1994 .

[17]  Eleazar Vasquez,et al.  Efficacy of Individualized Clinical Coaching in a Virtual Reality Classroom for Increasing Teachers' Fidelity of Implementation of Discrete Trial Teaching , 2012 .

[18]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[19]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education , 2006 .

[20]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[21]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[22]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[23]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Douglas O. Staiger,et al.  Gathering Feedback for Teaching: Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains. Research Paper. MET Project. , 2012 .

[25]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[26]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[28]  Bronwen Cowie,et al.  The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in Science Education. , 2001 .

[29]  Charles E. Hughes,et al.  Learning from Virtual Students. , 2014 .

[30]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse , 2003 .

[31]  F. Erickson chapter 8 Some Thoughts on “Proximal” Formative Assessment of Student Learning , 2007 .

[32]  Abbie Brown Simulated Classrooms and Artificial Students: The Potential Effects of New Technologies on Teacher Education. , 1999 .

[33]  Patricia E. Simmons,et al.  Beginning teachers : Beliefs and classroom actions , 1999 .

[34]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model , 2010 .

[35]  E. Jablonka International group for the psychology of mathematics education , 2008 .

[36]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[37]  Steven Pollock,et al.  Who Is Responsible for Preparing Science Teachers? , 2006, Science.

[38]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[39]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Preservice elementary teachers' views of their students' prior knowledge of science , 2008 .