Strategic planning of urban infrastructure for environmental sustainability: Understanding the past to intervene for the future

Abstract Urban infrastructure systems have long lifespans and influence the state of the environment for extended periods of time. Processes of strategic planning for urban infrastructure are thus instrumental to materializing environmental sustainability visions. Continued investments in infrastructure with adverse environmental impacts imply that sustainability priorities are not embedded in planning processes, as these processes tend to follow the path-dependent legacy of older planning paradigms. This study identifies the cognitive framings that underpin the evolution of strategic planning over the last century, to reveal the path-dependent attributes of strategic planning thinking that undermine alternative solutions. To do that, a scoping study of the literature on strategic planning of public infrastructure, from 1900 through 2013, was conducted. The findings reveal how the scholarly paradigms for infrastructure planning have transformed over time, from optimization to sustainability. While the planning practice in cities has often taken up the sustainability discourse in line with the scholarship, its actual attributes might lag behind. Knowledge about these attributes is scarce since the contemporary scholarship often contains aspirational proposals for change and little detail on how planning is undertaken in practice. It is likely that the incremental approach to infrastructure planning, which has been the dominant approach for decades, perpetuates a planning culture which contradicts the requirements for sustainability transitions, by limiting the scope of alternatives to optimizing the status quo instead of creating conditions for change. To develop effective planning interventions towards sustainability transitions in urban infrastructure systems, the paper calls for diagnostic tools that examine the realities of planning practice, and, operational frameworks for bridging historically-entrained modes of practice to sustainability aspirations.

[1]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Adaptive Airport Strategic Planning , 2010, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[2]  B. Truffer,et al.  The exploratory analysis of trade-offs in strategic planning: Lessons from Regional Infrastructure Foresight , 2009 .

[3]  Mark Gaterell,et al.  Elucidating Sustainability Sequencing, Tensions, and Trade-Offs in Development Decision Making , 2011 .

[4]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Does Planning Belong to the Politics of the Past? , 2012 .

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[6]  C. E. Merriam.  The National Resources Planning Board; A Chapter in American Planning Experience , 1944, American Political Science Review.

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[8]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world , 2013 .

[9]  Edward Hyatt.  The Central Valley Project of California , 1938 .

[10]  B. Wagle.  Management science and strategic planning , 1971 .

[11]  M. F. Cantley.  A Long-range Planning Case Study , 1969 .

[12]  Michael P. Brooks.  A Plethora of Paradigms , 1993 .

[13]  Lee Chapman,et al.  Resistance and resilience – paradigms for critical local infrastructure , 2012 .

[14]  C. E. Merriam.  The National Resources Planning Board , 1941 .

[15]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[16]  Richard O. Mason,et al.  A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning , 1969 .

[17]  P. Schoemaker.  MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION , 1993 .

[18]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Futures: an exploration of scenarios for sustainable urban water management , 2008 .

[19]  David W. Wright,et al.  INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[20]  R. Lempert,et al.  Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis , 2003 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[22]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/casp.774 Processes of Social Learning in Integrated Resources Management , 2022 .

[23]  B. Truffer,et al.  Tackling uncertainties in infrastructure sectors through strategic planning: the contribution of discursive approaches in the urban water sector , 2011 .

[24]  Louis Albrechts,et al.  Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective , 2013 .

[25]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Evidence-based Policy: In Search of a Method , 2002 .

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[27]  John Muller.  Paradigms and planning practice: Conceptual and contextual considerations , 1998 .

[28]  W. Walker.  Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations , 2000 .

[29]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning , 1994 .

[30]  George Abonyi.  SIAM: Strategic Impact and Assumptions-Identification Method for project, program, and policy planning , 1982 .

[31]  D. Levac,et al.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[32]  S. Al-Athel,et al.  Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" , 1987 .

[33]  William M. Hix,et al.  Assumption-Based Planning: A Planning Tool for Very Uncertain Times , 1995 .

[34]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  The urban futures methodology applied to urban regeneration , 2012 .

[35]  Tapio S. Katko,et al.  Water, time and European cities - History matters for the futures , 2005 .

[36]  John M. Bryson,et al.  The State of Public Strategic Management Research: A Selective Literature Review and Set of Future Directions , 2010 .

[37]  Neal D. Woods.  Regulatory Democracy Reconsidered: The Policy Impact of Public Participation Requirements , 2015 .

[38]  B. Truffer,et al.  Local strategic planning processes and sustainability transitions in infrastructure sectors , 2010 .

[39]  R. J. Litschert.  Some Characteristics of Long-Range Planning: An Industry Study , 1968 .

[40]  D. Gould,et al.  What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[41]  David M. Konisky,et al.  Values, Conflict, and Trust in Participatory Environmental Planning , 2000 .

[42]  Murray L. Weidenbaum.  Long-Range Planning in Business , 1964 .

[43]  Bert E. Swanson.  Connecting state and local futures: Goal setting and growth management of small towns in Florida , 1990 .

[44]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[45]  R. L. Porto,et al.  Integration of Water Quantity and Quality in Strategic River Basin Planning , 2000 .

[46]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Long-Range Planning---Challenge to Management Science , 1959 .

[47]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Applying private-sector strategic planning in the public sector , 1987 .

[48]  Charles S. Maier.  Between Taylorism and Technocracy: European ideologies and the vision of industrial productivity in the 1920s , 1970 .

[49]  A. Botti,et al.  Public-Private Partnerships and Network Governance , 2012 .

[50]  Brian McGrath,et al.  Ecological science and transformation to the sustainable city , 2013 .

[51]  S Lundie,et al.  Quantitative systems analysis as a strategic planning approach for metropolitan water service providers. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[52]  H. Jacobs,et al.  A Public Planning Perspective on Strategic Planning , 1987 .

[53]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Understanding Strategic Planning and the Formulation and Implementation of Strategic Plans as a Way of Knowing: The Contributions of Actor-Network Theory , 2009 .

[54]  J. Bryson.  A strategic planning process for public and non-profit organizations , 1988 .

[55]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[56]  S. Lanka.,et al.  ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC , 2010 .

[57]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Adapt or Perish: A Review of Planning Approaches for Adaptation under Deep Uncertainty , 2013 .

[58]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[59]  Bjorn Malbert.  Participatory Approaches Sustainable Urban Development: Reflections on Practice Vancouver and Waitakere to in Seattle, , 1998 .

[60]  H. Ligteringen,et al.  Implications of an uncertain future for port planning , 2010 .

[61]  Douglas C. Eadie,et al.  The Game Plan: Governance with Foresight , 1984 .

[62]  Judy Lawrence,et al.  Exploring climate change uncertainties to support adaptive management of changing flood-risk , 2013 .

[63]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[64]  R R Brown,et al.  Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[65]  Ernest R. Alexander,et al.  After Rationality, What? A Review of Responses to Paradigm Breakdown , 1984 .