Between a rock and a hard place: The failure of the attraction effect among unattractive alternatives

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[2]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[3]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Effect of Perceived Threat on Avoidance Maneuvers Selected While Viewing Cockpit Traffic Displays , 1982 .

[4]  Joel Huber,et al.  Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects , 1983 .

[5]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Toward understanding the attraction effect: The implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity. , 1987 .

[6]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[7]  A. O'Connor,et al.  Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  The Effects of Framing, Problem Variations, and Providing Rationale on Choice , 1991 .

[10]  B. Kahn,et al.  The Influence of External Constraints on Brand Choice: The Lone-Alternative Effect , 1991 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[12]  S. Mishra,et al.  Antecedents of the Attraction Effect: An Information-Processing Approach , 1993 .

[13]  Yigang Pan Sue O’Curry,et al.  The Attraction Effect and Political Choice in Two Elections , 1995 .

[14]  K. Sivakumar.  Role of price and quality tiers on the cluster effect in brand choice , 1995 .

[15]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Goals and Framing: How Outcome Focus Influences Motivation and Emotion , 1995 .

[16]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Seeking Subjective Dominance in Multidimensional Space: An Explanation of the Asymmetric Dominance Effect , 1995 .

[17]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior , 1995 .

[18]  Timothy B. Heath,et al.  Asymmetric Decoy Effects on Lower-Quality versus Higher-Quality Brands: Meta-analytic and Experimental Evidence , 1995 .

[19]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Context-Dependent Selection: The Effects of Decoy and Phantom Job Candidates , 1996 .

[20]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood and the use of scripts: does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[22]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[23]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[24]  William T. Ross,et al.  The Impact of Positive and Negative Affect and Issue Framing on Issue Interpretation and Risk Taking , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[25]  Sankar Sen.  Knowledge, Information Mode, and the Attraction Effect , 1998 .

[26]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  On feeling good and getting your way: mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Kaisa Herne.  The Effects of Decoy Gambles on Individual Choice , 1999 .

[28]  J. Doyle,et al.  The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in‐store purchases , 1999 .

[29]  M. Zeelenberg.  Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision-making , 1999 .

[30]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  The differential processing of price in gains and losses: the effects of frame and need for cognition , 2000 .

[31]  Wedell,et al.  Examining Models of Nondominated Decoy Effects across Judgment and Choice. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[32]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[33]  S. Shafir,et al.  Context-dependent violations of rational choice in honeybees (Apis mellifera) and gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  I. Levin,et al.  A New Look at Framing Effects: Distribution of Effect Sizes, Individual Differences, and Independence of Types of Effects , 2002 .

[35]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values: The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making , 2002 .

[36]  T. A. Hurly,et al.  Irrational choices in hummingbird foraging behaviour , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Rohini Ahluwalia.  How Prevalent Is the Negativity Effect in Consumer Environments , 2002 .

[38]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global Versus Local Processing of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[39]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[40]  H. Aarts,et al.  On Wildebeests and Humans , 2003, Psychological science.

[41]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Deep thoughts and shallow frames; on the susceptibility to framing effects. , 2003 .

[42]  Vikas Mittal,et al.  Decision Difficulty: Effects of Procedural and Outcome Accountability , 2005 .

[43]  Jongwon Park,et al.  The Effects of Decoys on Preference Shifts: The Role of Attractiveness and Providing Justification , 2005, Journal of Consumer Psychology.

[44]  Gerald L. Clore,et al.  With Sadness Comes Accuracy; With Happiness, False Memory , 2005, Psychological science.

[45]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[46]  Douglas H. Wedell,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bdm.557 Testing Alternative Explanations of Phantom Decoy Effects , 2007 .

[47]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Compromise and Attraction Effects under Prevention and Promotion Motivations , 2007 .

[48]  A. Rao,et al.  Could Ralph Nader's Entrance and Exit Have Helped Al Gore? The Impact of Decoy Dynamics on Consumer Choice , 2009 .

[49]  William M. Hedgcock,et al.  Trade-Off Aversion as an Explanation for the Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2009 .

[50]  Young-Won Ha,et al.  The Influence of Categorical Attributes on Choice Context Effects , 2009 .

[51]  R. Dhar,et al.  Deciding without Resources: Resource Depletion and Choice in Context , 2009 .

[52]  J. Payne,et al.  Commentaries and Rejoinder to “Trade-Off Aversion as an Explanation for the Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study”: Integrating Neural and Decision Sciences: Convergence and Constraints , 2009 .

[53]  Jonathan Levav,et al.  Motivational Compatibility and Choice Conflict , 2010 .

[54]  Subimal Chatterjee,et al.  The role of regulatory fit on the attraction effect , 2011 .

[55]  A. Kalra,et al.  When Trade-Offs Matter: The Effect of Choice Construal on Context Effects , 2011 .

[56]  Amar Cheema,et al.  Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples , 2013 .