Effects of lumbar spinal fusion on the other lumbar intervertebral levels (three-dimensional finite element analysis)

The risk of accelerating the degeneration of adjacent disc levels after lumbar spinal fusion is a controversial issue. A finite element model consisting of L1 to L5 lumbar spines was used to assess the effect on adjacent disc level after lumbar spinal fusion. We compared intact, L4/5 posterior interbody fusion (PLF), and L4/5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) models. The loading conditions applied were compressive force, compressive force plus flexion moment, and compressive force plus extension moment. Evaluations were made for von Mises stress on each vertebral end-plate, Tresca stress of all the annulus fibrosus, and Tresca stress of the annulus fibrosus from the posterior surface of the disc to the neural foramen. As the result, the von Mises stress adjacent to the fusion level was higher than the other nonfusion levels; it was higher under conditions of flexion moment loading plus compression loading [112% (2.59 PMa) in the PLF model and 117% (2.72 Mpa) in the PLIF model] than in the intact model. The Tresca stress of all the annulus fibrosus adjacent to the fusion level was higher than that on other nonfusion intervertebral levels; it was higher under conditions of flexion moment loading plus compression loading [127% (0.57 PMa) in the PLF model and 209% (0.89 Mpa) in the PLIF model] than in the intact model. The Tresca stress of the annulus fibrosus from the posterior surface of the disc to the neural foramen adjacent to the fusion level was higher than that on other nonfusion intervertebral levels; and it was higher under conditions of flexion moment loading plus compression loading [107% (1.48 PMa) in the PLF model and 112% (1.54 Mpa) in the PLIF model] than in the intact model. These findings demonstrate that with lumbar fusion, stresses on the vertebral end-plate and the annulus fibrosus were high adjacent to the fusion level; furthermore, stresses were higher in the PLIF model than in the PLF model. These results suggested that lumbar spinal fusion might bring with it a risk of damage to the annulus fibrosus and the vertebral end-plate adjacent to the fusion level.

[1]  A. E. Engin,et al.  Viscoelastic Finite-Element Analysis of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Combined Compression and Sagittal Flexion: Effect of Loading Rate , 2000, Spine.

[2]  K Kaneda,et al.  Stability of Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Its Effects on Adjacent Motion Segments in the Lumbosacral Spine , 1998, Spine.

[3]  L. Wiltse,et al.  The Transition Zone Above a Lumbosacral Fusion , 1998, Spine.

[4]  S. Kikuchi,et al.  In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. , 1999, Spine.

[5]  J S Wu,et al.  Clarification of the mechanical behaviour of spinal motion segments through a three-dimensional poroelastic mixed finite element model. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  B R Simon,et al.  1985 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Poroelastic Dynamic Structural Models of Rhesus Spinal Motion Segments , 1985, Spine.

[7]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  A B Schultz,et al.  Nonlinear behavior of the human intervertebral disc under axial load. , 1976, Journal of Biomechanics.

[9]  J. Schlegel,et al.  Lumbar Motion Segment Pathology Adjacent to Thoracolumbar, Lumbar, and Lumbosacral Fusions , 1996, Spine.

[10]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  A finite element study of a lumbar motion segment subjected to pure sagittal plane moments. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movements of the Whole Lumbar Spine and Lumbosacral Joint , 1989, Spine.

[12]  O Lindahl,et al.  Mechanical properties of dried defatted spongy bone. , 1976, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[13]  Y K Liu,et al.  A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Interlaminar Shear Stresses and Laminae Separation in a Disc: Finite Element Analysis of the L3‐L4 Motion Segment Subjected to Axial Compressive Loads , 1995, Spine.

[15]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  Intradiscal Pressure Measurements Above an Instrumented Fusion: A Cadaveric Study , 1995, Spine.

[16]  A. Nachemson The Load on Lumbar Disks in Different Positions of the Body , 1966, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  Chien-Jen Hsu,et al.  Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients , 2002, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[18]  D. Schlenzka,et al.  Disc degeneration in young patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated operatively or conservatively: A long-term follow-up , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[19]  N. Langrana,et al.  Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. , 1984, Spine.

[20]  H. Wu,et al.  Mechanical behavior of the human annulus fibrosus. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  A B Schultz,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of an intervertebral disc. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  M. Rahm,et al.  Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.

[23]  Etsuo Chosa,et al.  Mechanical analysis of the lumbar vertebrae in a three-dimensional finite element method model in which intradiscal pressure in the nucleus pulposus was used to establish the model , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.