Training Transfer: Perceptions of Computer Use Self-Efficacy among University Employees

This paper investigated transfer of training influences on computer self-efficacy and self-efficacy of computer technologies of training programs that met individual and organization objectives of university personnel. Subsequent to training, an assessment of computer self-efficacy and self-efficacy of computer technologies of employees was necessary for determining their duration and training usefulness. A descriptive survey design was used to gather data from a population of 2,597 university employees. Results indicated employee self-efficacy levels remained stable for a 2 1/2 year period. In addition, select sub-scales of the variables previous classroom computer training and computer use required on-the-job predicted computer self-efficacy. Job type, frequency of computer use, and training responsibilities were also noted to influence the transfer of training process as it pertains to computer self-efficacy.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[2]  P. Earley.  Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. , 1994 .

[3]  Steve M. Jex,et al.  Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study , 1992 .

[4]  Colette A. Frayne,et al.  Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and a replication. , 1988 .

[5]  Assessment of Computer Self-Efficacy: Instrument Development and Validation. , 1988 .

[6]  L. Parker,et al.  When to fix it and when to leave: relationships among perceived control, self-efficacy, dissent, and exit. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training , 1994 .

[8]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[9]  Stephenie P. Joyner.  SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition , 1985 .

[10]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Organisational Applications of Social Cognitive Theory , 1988 .

[11]  E. Altmaier,et al.  The relationship of prior training and previous teaching experience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants , 1994 .

[12]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management , 1987 .

[13]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[14]  M. Heilman,et al.  Managing human forces in organizations , 1982 .

[15]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING METHOD ON SELF‐EFFICACY AND IDEA GENERATION AMONG MANAGERS , 1989 .

[16]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[17]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Modeling the Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use , 1994, ICIS.

[18]  Micha Popper,et al.  Putting Leadership Theory to Work: A Conceptual Framework for Theory‐based Leadership Development , 1993 .

[19]  R. W. Stone,et al.  A Structural Equation Model Of End-User Satisfaction With A Computer-Based Medical Information System , 1994 .

[20]  Cynthia Lee,et al.  Relationship of Type A behavior pattern, self-efficacy perceptions on sales performance. , 1989 .

[21]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Computer Technologies in Teacher Education: The Measurement of Attitudes and Self-Efficacy. , 1993 .

[22]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[23]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Role of Computer Self-Efficacy in Predicting User Acceptance and Use of Information Technology , 1996 .