Barriers to communication about end-of-life care in AIDS patients

ObjectivePatients and physicians do not adequately discuss patients’ preferences for medical care at the end of life. Our objective was to perform a qualitative study using focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to communication about end-of-life medical care for patients with AIDS and their physicians.ParticipantsPatients with AIDS and physicians with moderate or extensive HIV experience were recruited from clinics and community-based settings using network sampling. A total of 47 patients participated in six focus groups and 19 physicians participated in three groups.Measurements and main resultsPatients or physicians identified 29 barriers and facilitators to communication about end-of-life care. Many patients and physicians expressed discomfort talking about death and dying, and some felt that discussing end-of-life care could cause harm or even hasten death. Several patients expressed the view that a living will obviated the need for discussion with their physician. Previous experience of discrimination from the health care system was a strong barrier to end-of-life communication for some patients with AIDS. Some patients hesitate to bring up end-of-life issues because they want to protect their physicians from uncomfortable discussions. Many patients identified the quality of communication as an important facilitator to these difficult discussions.ConclusionsImproving the quality of patient-physician communication about end-of-life care will require that physicians identify and overcome the barriers to this communication. To improve the quality of medical care at the end of life, we must address the quality of communication about end-of-life care.

[1]  Marion Danis,et al.  Can Clinical Interventions Change Care at the End of Life? , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  K. Foley Competent care for the dying instead of physician-assisted suicide. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Tulsky,et al.  The Effect of Ethnicity on ICU Use and DNR Orders in Hospitalized AIDS Patients , 1997, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[4]  R. Califf,et al.  Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  J. Tulsky,et al.  See One, Do One, Teach One?: House Staff Experience Discussing Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders , 1996 .

[6]  B. Lo Improving care near the end of life. Why is it so hard? , 1995, JAMA.

[7]  William A. Knaus,et al.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. , 1995, JAMA.

[8]  L. Rhodes,et al.  Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation. Benefit or harm? , 1995, JAMA.

[9]  M. Krone,et al.  Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. , 1995, JAMA.

[10]  L. Honig,et al.  The naturalness of dying. , 1995, JAMA.

[11]  B. Reilly,et al.  Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  R. Morrison,et al.  Physician reluctance to discuss advance directives. An empiric investigation of potential barriers. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Discussion of preferences for life-sustaining care by persons with AIDS. Predictors of failure in patient-physician communication. , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  D L Patrick,et al.  Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness: who wants what? , 1993, Journal of general internal medicine.

[15]  R. Langer,et al.  Effects of Offering Advance Directives on Medical Treatments and Costs , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  L. I. Southerland,et al.  A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  H. Muslin,et al.  Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients. , 1989, Journal of medical ethics.

[18]  R. Wachter,et al.  Decisions about resuscitation: inequities among patients with different diseases but similar prognoses. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  C. Guest,et al.  AIDS and its metaphors. , 1989, Social science & medicine.

[20]  K. Cain,et al.  Physicians' and spouses' predictions of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences. , 1988, Journal of gerontology.

[21]  L. Medlen Social impact of AIDS. , 1988, Nursing RSA = Verpleging RSA.

[22]  Revision of the CDC surveillance case definition for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; AIDS Program, Center for Infectious Diseases. , 1987, MMWR supplements.

[23]  R. Steinbrook,et al.  Preferences of homosexual men with AIDS for life-sustaining treatment. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.