Building Governance Capability in Online Communities: A Social Network Perspective

Online communities are increasingly seen as new forms of organising. However, we have limited understanding of how governance emerges in an online community. Prior literature either focuses on governance as a dynamic process-oriented view or as static comparative analysis, in contexts where the online community is mature and well established. This paper therefore seeks to explore how governance evolves throughout the history of an online community, from an embryonic stage, through the emergence stage to the establishe stage. In the context of an online community built around a GitHub-hosted project called GitPoint, we draw on the concept of capability to carry out a theoretical narrative of interactions between individual members that are conducted across social networks, including Twitter and Gitter. Based on this narrative, the paper offers insights into the emergence of governance in an online community and makes key contributions to the literature on governance in such communities.

[1]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Research Commentary - Data-Driven Computationally Intensive Theory Development , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  The Evolution of Leadership Structures in Online Communities: a Social Network Perspective , 2019, ECIS.

[3]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  A Relational Approach on Collaborative Resource Spending in Online Communities , 2018, ICIS.

[4]  Hani Safadi,et al.  Social Media Affordances for Connective Action: An Examination of Microblogging Use During the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill , 2017, MIS Q..

[5]  Maha Shaikh,et al.  Governing open source software through coordination processes , 2017, Inf. Organ..

[6]  Vegard Kolbjørnsrud,et al.  Agency problems and governance mechanisms in collaborative communities , 2017 .

[7]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Peer production, the commons, and the future of the firm , 2017 .

[8]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Coordinating Interdependencies in Online Communities: A Study of an Open Source Software Project , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows , 2016 .

[10]  Aleksi Aaltonen,et al.  Building Governance Capability in Online Social Production: Insights from Wikipedia , 2015 .

[11]  Hani Safadi,et al.  The Emergence of Online Community Leadership , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Teppo Felin,et al.  Organizational Economics of Capability and Heterogeneity , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Michael G. Jacobides,et al.  Capabilities: Structure, Agency, and Evolution , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Aleksi Aaltonen,et al.  Governing Complex Social Production in the Internet: The Emergence of a Collective Capability in Wikipedia , 2011 .

[15]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Aleksi Aaltonen,et al.  Governing social production in the internet: the case of wikipedia , 2011, ECIS.

[17]  Jocelyn M. DeGroot,et al.  Self-Governance Through Group Discussion in Wikipedia , 2011 .

[18]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[19]  M. Zack.  Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2009 .

[20]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of knowledge about society , 2008 .

[21]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Online Communities and Open Innovation , 2008 .

[22]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[23]  M. Markus.  The governance of free/open source software projects: monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? , 2007 .

[24]  Siobhan O’Mahony,et al.  The governance of open source initiatives: what does it mean to be community managed? , 2007 .

[25]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[26]  Hans-Jürgen Engelbrecht.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[27]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[28]  C. Jensen,et al.  Collaboration, leadership, control, and conflict negotiation in the Netbeans.org community , 2004, ICSE 2004.

[29]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Organizational Capabilities, Patterns of Knowledge Accumulation and Governance Structures in Business Firms: An Introduction , 2008 .

[30]  J. Child,et al.  Corporate Governance and New Organizational Forms: Issues of Double and Multiple Agency , 2003 .

[31]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[32]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Version management tools: CVS to BK in the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[33]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[34]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[35]  A. Madhok.  Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production , 2002 .

[36]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[37]  James L. Perry,et al.  Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research , 2001 .

[38]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[39]  Amy Jo Kim,et al.  Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities , 2000 .

[40]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[41]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .