Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Elderly: Changes in Case-Mix and Periprocedural Outcomes in 31 758 Patients Treated Between 2000 and 2007

Background—The elderly account for an increasing proportion of the population and have a high prevalence of coronary heart disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most common method of revascularization in the elderly. We examined whether the risk of periprocedural complications after PCI was higher among elderly (age ≥75 years) patients and whether it has changed over time. Methods and Results—The Scottish Coronary Revascularization Register was used to undertake a retrospective cohort study on all 31 758 patients undergoing nonemergency PCI in Scotland between April 2000 and March 2007, inclusive. There was an increase in the number and percentage of PCIs undertaken in elderly patients, from 196 (8.7%) in 2000 to 752 (13.9%) in 2007. Compared with younger patients, the elderly were more likely to have multivessel disease, multiple comorbidity, and a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass grafting (&khgr;2 tests, all P<0.001). The elderly had a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days of PCI (4.5% versus 2.7%, &khgr;2 test P<0.001). Over the 7 years, there was a significant increase in the proportion of elderly patients who had multiple comorbidity (&khgr;2 test for trend, P<0.001). Despite this, the underlying risk of complications did not change significantly over time either among the elderly (&khgr;2 test for trend, P=0.142) or overall (&khgr;2 test for trend, P=0.083). Conclusions—Elderly patients have a higher risk of periprocedural complications and account for an increasing proportion of PCIs. Despite this, the risk of complications after PCI has not increased over time.

[1]  W. Ghali,et al.  Survival After Coronary Revascularization in the Elderly , 2002, Circulation.

[2]  J. Spertus,et al.  Trends in the Association Between Age and In-Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: National Cardiovascular Data Registry Experience , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  J. Jayne,et al.  Age-based differences of percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. , 2006, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[6]  M. Parikh,et al.  Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (<60, 60 to 80, and >80 years) (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  Computerised record linkage: compared with traditional patient follow-up methods in clinical trials and illustrated in a prospective epidemiological study. The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  K. Channon,et al.  Same day discharge following elective percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina , 2003, Heart.

[9]  M. Morice,et al.  One-month results of coronary stenting in patients > or = 75 years of age. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  A. Yan,et al.  Age-related differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, American heart journal.

[11]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study: Identification of high-risk groups and comparison with other cardiovascular intervention trials , 1996 .

[12]  K. Eagle,et al.  Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006. , 2007, JAMA.

[13]  D. Holmes,et al.  Drug-eluting stents in octogenarians: early and intermediate outcome. , 2008, American heart journal.

[14]  W. Cumberland,et al.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  D. Holmes,et al.  Application of evidence-based medical therapy is associated with improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and is a valid quality indicator. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Cuzick,et al.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.