Recursion in prosodic phrasing: evidence from Connemara Irish

One function of prosodic phrasing is its role in aiding in the recoverability of syntactic structure. In recent years, a growing body of work suggests it is possible to find concrete phonetic and phonological evidence that recursion in syntactic structure is preserved in the prosodic organization of utterances (Ladd 1986, 1988; Kubozono 1989, 1992; Féry and Truckenbrodt 2005; Wagner 2005, 2010; Selkirk 2009, 2011; Ito and Mester 2013; Myrberg 2013). This paper argues that the distribution of phrase-level phrase accents in Connemara Irish provides a new type of evidence in favour of this hypothesis: that, under ideal conditions, syntactic constituents are mapped onto prosodic constituents in a one-to-one fashion, such that information about the nested relationships between syntactic constituents is preserved through the recursion of prosodic domains. Through an empirical investigation of both clausal and nominal constructions, I argue that the distribution of phrasal phrase accents in Connemara Irish can be used as a means of identifying recursive bracketing in prosodic structure.

[1]  Mícheál Ó Siadhail.  Modern Irish: Grammatical Structure and Dialectal Variation , 1990 .

[2]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[3]  Stephen G. Parker,et al.  Phonological argumentation : essays on evidence and motivation , 2009 .

[4]  Carol Georgopoulos,et al.  Interdisciplinary approaches to language : essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda , 1992 .

[5]  Caroline Féry,et al.  Hierarchical prosodic structures in the intonation of center-embedded relative clauses , 2010 .

[6]  Francis Nolan,et al.  IVie - a comparative transcription system for intonational variation in English , 1998, ICSLP.

[7]  B. Hayes.  Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies , 1995 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Remarks on Nominalization , 2020, Nominalization.

[9]  Martha Dalton,et al.  Tonal Alignment in Irish Dialects , 2005, Language and speech.

[10]  James Mccloskey.  Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish , 1991 .

[11]  A. Werle.  Word, Phrase, and Clitic Prosody in Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian , 2009 .

[12]  Peter Wynn Thomas.  Gramadeg y Gymraeg , 1996 .

[13]  J. Pierrehumbert.  The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[14]  Marjorie Pak,et al.  The postsyntactic derivation and its phonological reflexes , 2008 .

[15]  Chris Collins,et al.  The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory , 2001 .

[16]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[17]  James McCloskey.  The Distribution of Subject Properties in Irish , 2001 .

[18]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  The handbook of phonological theory , 2011 .

[19]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[20]  Junko Ito,et al.  Prosodic Adjunction in Japanese Compounds , 2006 .

[21]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[22]  Scott Myers.  Ocp Effects in Optimality Theory , 1997 .

[23]  Janet Grijzenhout,et al.  Phonological domains : universals and deviations , 2009 .

[24]  Robert D. Borsley,et al.  The Syntax of the Celtic Languages: A Comparative Perspective , 2005 .

[25]  Stanley Dubinsky,et al.  Objects and Other Subjects , 2001 .

[26]  Giuseppe Longobardi,et al.  The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters, and Problems , 2008 .

[27]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Downstep in Dutch: implications for a model , 1992 .

[28]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure , 1986, Phonology.

[29]  Haruo Kubozono.  Syntactic and rhythmic effects on downstep in Japanese , 1989, Phonology.

[30]  A. Green.  The prosodic structure of Irish, Scots Gaelic, and Manx , 1997 .

[31]  S. Ishihara.  Major Phrase, Focus Intonation, Multiple Spell-Out (MaP, FI, MSO) , 2007 .

[32]  Draga Zec,et al.  The Phonology-syntax connection , 1990 .

[33]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Prosodic Structure of Function Words , 2008 .

[34]  G. Bruce.  Swedish word accents in sentence perspective , 1977 .

[35]  Junko Ito,et al.  The onset of the prosodic word , 2007 .

[36]  Caroline Féry,et al.  German sentence accents and embedded prosodic phrases , 2011 .

[37]  Junko Ito,et al.  Weak Layering and Word Binarity , 2003 .

[38]  D. Ladd.  Declination ‘‘reset’’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances , 1988 .

[39]  R. Sproat,et al.  The Cross-Linguistic Distribution of Adjective Ordering Restrictions , 1991 .

[40]  E. Selkirk,et al.  Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs , 2007 .

[41]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Phonological phrases : their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence , 1995 .

[42]  C. Féry,et al.  Sisterhood and tonal scaling , 2005 .

[43]  Ur Shlonsky,et al.  The form of Semitic noun phrases , 2004 .

[44]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Principles and Parameters in a VSO Language: A Case Study in Welsh , 2005 .

[45]  Mirco Ghini,et al.  Phi-formation in Italian: a new proposal , 1993 .

[46]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  On the Evidence for Partial N-Movement in the Romance DP , 1993 .

[47]  Armin Mester,et al.  Prosodic subcategories in Japanese , 2013 .

[48]  James Mccloskey,et al.  Government, barriers and small clauses in Modern Irish , 1987 .

[49]  P. Lacy,et al.  Papers in optimality theory , 1995 .

[50]  Arsalan Kahnemuyipour,et al.  The Syntax of Sentential Stress , 2009 .

[51]  T. Ernst.  The Syntax of Adjuncts , 2002 .

[52]  Yoshihito Dobashi.  Computational efficiency in the syntax–phonology interface , 2010 .

[53]  James Mccloskey.  The syntax of the Celtic languages: Subjects and subject positions in Irish , 1996 .

[54]  G. Cinque.  The ‘antisymmetric’ programme: theoretical and typological implications , 1996, Journal of Linguistics.

[55]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[56]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  On clause and intonational phrase in Japanese: the syntactic grounding of prosodic constituent structure (特集 言語構造のインターフェイス) , 2009 .

[57]  Sara Myrberg,et al.  The Intonational Phonology of Stockholm Swedish , 2010 .

[58]  Sara Myrberg,et al.  Sisterhood in prosodic branching* , 2013, Phonology.

[59]  Michael Wagner,et al.  Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond , 2010 .

[60]  Yoshihito Dobashi.  Multiple spell-out, assembly problem, and syntax-phonology mapping , 2009 .

[61]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Deutsche Syntax : generativ : Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik , 1993 .

[62]  R. Larson.  On the double object construction , 1988 .

[63]  James Mccloskey,et al.  Lightest to the Right: An Apparently Anomalous Displacement in Irish , 2016, Linguistic Inquiry.

[64]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[65]  David Adger,et al.  VSO Order and Weak Pronouns in Goidelic Celtic , 1997, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[66]  Nathalie Sinclair,et al.  Focus on Language , 2013 .

[67]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[68]  Armin Mester,et al.  9. Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese , 2009 .

[69]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[70]  Ailbhe Ní Chasaide,et al.  Peak timing in two dialects of connaught irish , 2005, INTERSPEECH.

[71]  Emily Elfner,et al.  Syntax-Prosody Interactions in Irish , 2012 .

[72]  J. McCawley.  The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese , 1968 .

[73]  Elisabeth Selkirk.  The Syntax‐Phonology Interface , 2011 .

[74]  David Willis,et al.  Against N-raising and NP-raising analyses of Welsh noun phrases , 2006 .

[75]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[76]  Haruo Kubozono.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Modeling syntactic effects on downstep in Japanese , 1992 .

[77]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology , 2000, Phonology.