Small‐aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: 3‐year follow‐up

PURPOSE: To report the 3‐year postoperative safety and efficacy outcomes of the Acufocus corneal inlay. SETTING: University Eye Clinic, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized noncomparative cohort study. METHODS: The corneal inlay was implanted in the nondominant eye of naturally emmetropic presbyopic patients. Refraction, uncorrected near (UNVA), intermediate (UIVA), and distance (UDVA) visual acuities; corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA); contrast sensitivity; visual fields; subjective patient satisfaction and symptoms; and operative and postoperative adverse events and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The study enrolled 32 patients. The mean UNVA improved from Jaeger (J) 6 preoperatively to J1 at 3 years and the mean UIVA, from 20/40 to 20/25, respectively. At 3 years, 97% of eyes had a UNVA of J3 or better and 91% had a UIVA of 20/32 or better. The mean UDVA was 20/20, with all eyes achieving 20/32 or better. Nine eyes (28.3%) lost 1 line of CDVA, 1 eye (3.1%) lost more than 2 lines (3.8 lines), and 3 eyes (9.3%) gained 1 line. No inlay was explanted, and no inflammatory reactions were observed. At 3 years, 15.6% of patients reported severe night‐vision problems and 6.3% (versus 87.5% preoperatively) reported being dependent on reading glasses. CONCLUSIONS: These 3‐year results support the safety and efficacy of the corneal inlay to correct presbyopia in naturally emmetropic presbyopic patients. However, despite a significant gain in UNVA and UIVA, 28.3% of patients lost 1 line of CDVA. Financial Disclosure: Acufocus, Inc., California, USA, financially supports the Research Foundation for Promoting Opthhalmology, Salzburg, Austria, as the clinical research center of the University Eye Clinic, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg. Dr. Grabner received travel expenses from Acufocus, Inc. Dr. Riha currently works as a clinical application specialist for Acufocus, Inc. Drs. Seyeddain, Hohensinn, Nix, Rückl, and Dexl have no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

[1]  V. Chuckpaiwong,et al.  Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on the corneal endothelium. , 2003, Journal of refractive surgery.

[2]  R. Steinert,et al.  Monovision in LASIK. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[3]  Jorge L Alió,et al.  Corneal multifocality with excimer laser for presbyopia correction , 2009, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[4]  E. Manche,et al.  Regression of effect over long‐term follow‐up of conductive keratoplasty to correct mild to moderate hyperopia , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  Werner Adler,et al.  Measuring contrast sensitivity in normal subjects with OPTEC® 6500: influence of age and glare , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[6]  H. Kawakami,et al.  Biocompatibility of fluorinated polyimide. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  L. Langan,et al.  Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[8]  Corina van de Pol,et al.  Intracorneal inlay for the surgical correction of presbyopia , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  Yingfeng Zheng,et al.  Refractive error and biometry in older Chinese adults: the Liwan eye study. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Angela Ehmer,et al.  Early outcomes of INTRACOR femtosecond laser treatment for presbyopia. , 2009, Journal of refractive surgery.

[11]  J. Barraquer,et al.  Modification of refraction by means of intracorneal inclusions. , 1966, International ophthalmology clinics.

[12]  R. Klein,et al.  Changes in refraction over 10 years in an adult population: the Beaver Dam Eye study. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  K. McLean,et al.  Synthetic corneal inlays , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[14]  R. E. Smith,et al.  Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) on the corneal endothelium 3 years postoperatively. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.

[15]  R. Epstein,et al.  Presbyopia treatment by monocular peripheral presbyLASIK. , 2009, Journal of refractive surgery.

[16]  J. Ruckhofer,et al.  Clinical characteristics of lamellar channel deposits after implantation of Intacs , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  D. Sanders,et al.  US FDA clinical trial of the Tetraflex potentially accommodating IOL: comparison to concurrent age-matched monofocal controls. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[18]  Jorge L Alio,et al.  Hydrogel intracorneal inlays for the correction of hyperopia: outcomes and complications after 5 years of follow-up. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Orang Seyeddain,et al.  Refractive surgical correction of presbyopia with the AcuFocus small aperture corneal inlay: two-year follow-up. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[20]  Mujtaba A. Qazi,et al.  Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  Susana Marcos,et al.  The depth-of-field of the human eye from objective and subjective measurements , 1999, Vision Research.