Cue-Based Processing Capacity, Cognitive Load and the Completion of Simulated Short-Duration Vigilance Tasks in Power Transmission Control

Summary The interaction between human operators and advanced technology systems has become increasingly complex, particularly with the introduction of automated and semi-automated systems. This complexity is evident in increasing demands for vigilance in what might be regarded as low stimulus environments. Using resource theory as an explanation of the reduction in sustained attention to a task, the present study sought to examine the relationship between cue utilisation and sustained attention in the context of simulated power system control. The participants comprised power system operators from an Australian power transmission organisation, together with university engineering students. Controlling for experience, the results identified a relationship between different levels of cue utilisation and response latency over successive trials on a short vigilance task, consistent with resource theory. At an applied level, the results have implications for the selection and assessment for operators in environments where sustained attention is a necessary requirement. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Effects of Signal Salience and Caffeine on Performance, Workload, and Stress in an Abbreviated Vigilance Task , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[2]  David O'Hare,et al.  Weatherwise: Evaluation of a Cue-Based Training Approach for the Recognition of Deteriorating Weather Conditions during Flight , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[3]  P. Hancock,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention , 1989, Human factors.

[4]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Vigilance: Taxonomy And Utility , 1987 .

[5]  E. Soetens,et al.  Psychophysiological investigation of vigilance decrement: Boredom or cognitive fatigue? , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[6]  H. J. Einhorn.  Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. , 1974 .

[7]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[8]  James L. Szalma,et al.  The Vigilance Decrement Reflects Limitations in Effortful Attention, Not Mindlessness , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Frank L. Greitzer,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making for Power System Operators , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  I. Robertson,et al.  The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  Kelley S. Parsons,et al.  The abbreviated vigilance task and cerebral hemodynamics , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[13]  W. Helton,et al.  Working memory load and the vigilance decrement , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Gravenstein,et al.  The effect of fatigue on the performance of a simulated anesthetic monitoring task , 2004, Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

[15]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Tests of vigilance taxonomy. , 1998 .

[16]  W. Helton,et al.  Feature absence–presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention , 2011, Psychological research.

[17]  W H Teichner,et al.  The Detection of a Simple Visual Signal as a Function of Time of Watch , 1974, Human factors.

[18]  H E ROSVOLD,et al.  A continuous performance test of brain damage. , 1956, Journal of consulting psychology.

[19]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[20]  W. Helton,et al.  Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[21]  W. Helton,et al.  Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Cerebral Hemodynamics and Vigilance Performance , 2009 .

[23]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful , 2008, Hum. Factors.