Controlled Monte Carlo data generation for statistical damage identification employing Mahalanobis squared distance

The use of Mahalanobis squared distance–based novelty detection in statistical damage identification has become increasingly popular in recent years. The merit of the Mahalanobis squared distance–based method is that it is simple and requires low computational effort to enable the use of a higher dimensional damage-sensitive feature, which is generally more sensitive to structural changes. Mahalanobis squared distance–based damage identification is also believed to be one of the most suitable methods for modern sensing systems such as wireless sensors. Although possessing such advantages, this method is rather strict with the input requirement as it assumes the training data to be multivariate normal, which is not always available particularly at an early monitoring stage. As a consequence, it may result in an ill-conditioned training model with erroneous novelty detection and damage identification outcomes. To date, there appears to be no study on how to systematically cope with such practical issues especially in the context of a statistical damage identification problem. To address this need, this article proposes a controlled data generation scheme, which is based upon the Monte Carlo simulation methodology with the addition of several controlling and evaluation tools to assess the condition of output data. By evaluating the convergence of the data condition indices, the proposed scheme is able to determine the optimal setups for the data generation process and subsequently avoid unnecessarily excessive data. The efficacy of this scheme is demonstrated via applications to a benchmark structure data in the field.

[1]  Keith Worden,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING METHODOLOGY: PART II. NOVELTY DETECTION ON A GNAT AIRCRAFT , 2003 .

[2]  K. Worden,et al.  The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Subhash Sharma Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[4]  Angel R. Martinez,et al.  Computational Statistics Handbook with MATLAB , 2001 .

[5]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Novelty detection in a changing environment: Regression and interpolation approaches , 2002 .

[6]  W. L. Dunn,et al.  Exploring Monte Carlo Methods , 2011 .

[7]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  DATA NORMALIZATION: A KEY FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING , 2001 .

[8]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Applying the LANL Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm for Structural Health Monitoring to Data from a Surface-Effect Fast Patrol Boat , 2001 .

[9]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A Review of Structural Health Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature 1996-2001. , 2002 .

[10]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[11]  Angel R. Martinez,et al.  : Exploratory data analysis with MATLAB ® , 2007 .

[12]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  Methods of Multivariate Analysis, 2nd Ed. , 2004 .

[13]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[14]  Clemens Reimann,et al.  Multivariate outlier detection in exploration geochemistry , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[15]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[16]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets , 2009 .

[17]  Keith Worden,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION USING OUTLIER ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[18]  David A. Nix,et al.  Vibration–based structural damage identification , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability , 2011 .

[20]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Effects of Wireless Sensor Network Uncertainties on Output-Only Modal-Based Damage Identification , 2014 .

[21]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Statistical pattern recognition for Structural Health Monitoring using time series modeling: Theory and experimental verifications , 2009 .

[22]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2012 .