University patenting and scientific productivity: a quantitative study of Italian academic inventors

Based on longitudinal data for a matched sample of 592 Italian academic inventors and controls, the paper explores the impact of patenting on university professors’ scientific productivity, as measured by publication and citation counts. Academic inventors (university professors who appear as designated inventors on at least one patent application) publish more and better quality papers than their colleagues with no patents, and increase their productivity after patenting. Endogeneity problems are addressed using instrumental variables and applying inverse probability of treatment weights. The beneficial effect of patenting on publication rates last longer for academic inventors with more than one patent.

[1]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[2]  Alberto Di Minin,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: the relationship between faculty patenting and publishing , 2004 .

[3]  Brent D. Goldfarb,et al.  Scholarship and inventive activity in the university: complements or substitutes? , 2009 .

[4]  Joaquín María Azagra Caro,et al.  University patents: output and input indicators … of what? , 2003 .

[5]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[6]  E. Mansfield.  Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[7]  S. Cole.  Making Science: Between Nature and Society , 1992 .

[8]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium , 2003 .

[9]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors , 2003, Scientometrics.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[11]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty , 2005 .

[12]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[14]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[15]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[16]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Measuring Science: An Exploration , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. , 2000, Epidemiology.

[18]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[19]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Science and the University , 2007 .

[20]  C. Gross,et al.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[21]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Are There Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A Life Cycle View , 2005 .

[22]  F. Windmeijer,et al.  Estimation of Panel Data Models with Binary Indicators When Treatment Effects are Not Constant Over Time , 2004 .

[23]  M. Schmiemann,et al.  New Approaches to Technology Transfer from Publicly Funded Research , 2003 .

[24]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  Labour Mobility of Academic Inventors: Career Decision and Knowledge Transfer , 2006 .

[25]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[26]  S. Breschi,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .

[27]  R. Kneller,et al.  Technology transfer: a review for biomedical researchers. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[28]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[29]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[30]  A. Link,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices : An Exploratory Study # , 1999 .

[31]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  From Publishing to Patenting: do Productive Scientists Turn into Academic Inventors? , 2005 .

[32]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database , 2008 .

[33]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time, , 1994 .

[34]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[35]  J. S. Long,et al.  Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity. , 1993 .

[36]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States , 2004 .

[37]  Richard A. Jensen,et al.  Patent Licensing and the Research University , 2004 .

[38]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Who is Selling the Ivory Tower , 2000 .