Feature Level-Sets: Generalizing Iso-Surfaces to Multi-Variate Data

Iso-surfaces or level-sets provide an effective and frequently used means for feature visualization. However, they are restricted to simple features for uni-variate data. The approach does not scale when moving to multi-variate data or when considering more complex feature definitions. In this paper, we introduce the concept of traits and feature level-sets, which can be understood as a generalization of level-sets as it includes iso-surfaces, and fiber surfaces as special cases. The concept is applicable to a large class of traits defined as subsets in attribute space, which can be arbitrary combinations of points, lines, surfaces and volumes. It is implemented into a system that provides an interface to define traits in an interactive way and multiple rendering options. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach using multi-variate data sets of different nature, including vector and tensor data, from different application domains.

[1]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  On the Extraction of Long-living Features in Unsteady Fluid Flows , 2011, Topological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization.

[2]  Helwig Hauser,et al.  Visualization of Multi‐Variate Scientific Data , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[3]  Ingrid Hotz,et al.  Tensor Invariants and Glyph Design , 2014, Visualization and Processing of Tensors and Higher Order Descriptors for Multi-Valued Data.

[4]  Tobias Isenberg.  A Survey of Illustrative Visualization Techniques for Diffusion-Weighted MRI Tractography , 2015, Visualization and Processing of Higher Order Descriptors for Multi-Valued Data.

[5]  Hans Hagen,et al.  Tensor Field Reconstruction Based on Eigenvector and Eigenvalue Interpolation , 2010, Scientific Visualization: Advanced Concepts.

[6]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  A Review of Tensors and Tensor Signal Processing , 2009, Tensors in Image Processing and Computer Vision.

[7]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Eurographics/ Ieee-vgtc Symposium on Visualization (2007) Interactive Visualization of Multi-field Medical Data Using Linked Physical and Feature-space Views , 2022 .

[8]  Julien Tierny,et al.  Fast and Exact Fiber Surfaces for Tetrahedral Meshes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  G. Kindlmann,et al.  Orthogonal tensor invariants and the analysis of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Ronald Peikert,et al.  Definition of a Multifield , 2014, Scientific Visualization.

[11]  Min Chen,et al.  Scientific Visualization: Uncertainty, Multifield, Biomedical, and Scalable Visualization , 2014 .

[12]  Sim Heng Ong,et al.  A two-level clustering approach for multidimensional transfer function specification in volume visualization , 2015, The Visual Computer.

[13]  Valerio Pascucci,et al.  Direct Multifield Volume Ray Casting of Fiber Surfaces , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[14]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Automating Transfer Function Design with Valley Cell‐Based Clustering of 2D Density Plots , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[15]  Han-Wei Shen,et al.  Multivariate volumetric data analysis and visualization through bottom-up subspace exploration , 2017, 2017 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[16]  Jun-ichiro Toriwaki,et al.  New algorithms for euclidean distance transformation of an n-dimensional digitized picture with applications , 1994, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Stefan Bruckner,et al.  Volume visualization based on statistical transfer-function spaces , 2010, 2010 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[18]  Aaron Knoll,et al.  Fiber Surfaces: Generalizing Isosurfaces to Bivariate Data , 2015, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[19]  Harald Obermaier,et al.  Feature-Based Visualization of Multifields , 2014, Scientific Visualization.

[20]  Björn Meyer,et al.  A Visual Approach to Analysis of Stress Tensor Fields , 2011, Scientific Visualization: Interactions, Features, Metaphors.

[21]  João Luiz Dihl Comba,et al.  Memory-Efficient Order-Independent Transparency with Dynamic Fragment Buffer , 2012, 2012 25th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images.

[22]  Jinta Zheng,et al.  A Clustering-Based Automatic Transfer Function Design for Volume Visualization , 2016 .

[23]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Extensions of Parallel Coordinates for Interactive Exploration of Large Multi-Timepoint Data Sets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  Jörg-Stefan Praßni,et al.  Shape-based transfer functions for volume visualization , 2010, 2010 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[25]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Visualization and Processing of Tensors and Higher Order Descriptors for Multi-Valued Data , 2014 .

[26]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Example-based interactive illustration of multi-field datasets , 2010, Comput. Graph..

[27]  Jens H. Krüger,et al.  State of the Art in Transfer Functions for Direct Volume Rendering , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[28]  Markus Stommel,et al.  Visualization and Analysis of Second‐Order Tensors: Moving Beyond the Symmetric Positive‐Definite Case , 2013, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[29]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  Size-based Transfer Functions: A New Volume Exploration Technique , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[30]  Gerik Scheuermann,et al.  Tensor Lines in Engineering: Success, Failure, and Open Questions , 2015, Visualization and Processing of Higher Order Descriptors for Multi-Valued Data.

[31]  Helwig Hauser,et al.  Interactive Focus+Context Analysis of Large, Time-Dependent Flow Simulation Data , 2006, Simul..

[32]  Gordon L. Kindlmann,et al.  Strategies for Direct Volume Rendering of Diffusion Tensor Fields , 2000, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[33]  Hamish Carr,et al.  Feature Analysis in Multifields , 2014, Scientific Visualization.

[34]  Jay D. Humphrey,et al.  An invariant basis for natural strain which yields orthogonal stress response terms in isotropic hyperelasticity , 2000 .