Limited predictive value of blastomere angle of division in trophectoderm and inner cell mass specification

The formation of trophectoderm (TE) and pluripotent inner cell mass (ICM) is one of the earliest events during mammalian embryogenesis. It is believed that the orientation of division of polarised blastomeres in the 8- and 16-cell stage embryo determines the fate of daughter cells, based on how asymmetrically distributed lineage determinants are segregated. To investigate the relationship between angle of division and subsequent fate in unperturbed embryos, we constructed cellular resolution digital representations of the development of mouse embryos from the morula to early blastocyst stage, based on 4D confocal image volumes. We find that at the 16-cell stage, very few inside cells are initially produced as a result of cell division, but that the number increases due to cell movement. Contrary to expectations, outside cells at the 16-cell stage represent a heterogeneous population, with some fated to contributing exclusively to the TE and others capable of contributing to both the TE and ICM. Our data support the view that factors other than the angle of division, such as the position of a blastomere, play a major role in the specification of TE and ICM.

[1]  Jan Huisken,et al.  Selective plane illumination microscopy techniques in developmental biology , 2009, Development.

[2]  A. Handyside.  Time of commitment of inside cells isolated from preimplantation mouse embryos. , 1978, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[3]  M. Bonsall,et al.  Theoretical exploration of blastocyst morphogenesis. , 2009, The International journal of developmental biology.

[4]  Yixian Zheng,et al.  Lineage mapping the pre-implantation mouse embryo by two-photon microscopy, new insights into the segregation of cell fates. , 2011, Developmental biology.

[5]  T P Fleming,et al.  A quantitative analysis of cell allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[6]  A. Handyside,et al.  The developmental potential of mouse 16-cell blastomeres. , 1982, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[7]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  Origin and formation of the first two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  E. Lehtonen,et al.  Formation and consequences of cell patterns in preimplantation mouse development. , 1979, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[9]  M. Zernicka-Goetz.  The first cell-fate decisions in the mouse embryo: destiny is a matter of both chance and choice. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[10]  J. McConnell,et al.  Lineage allocation and cell polarity during mouse embryogenesis. , 2004, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[11]  M H Johnson,et al.  Cell interactions influence the fate of mouse blastomeres undergoing the transition from the 16- to the 32-cell stage. , 1983, Developmental biology.

[12]  Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Formation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the mouse blastocyst: relationships between orientation of early cleavage divisions and pattern of symmetric/asymmetric divisions , 2008, Development.

[13]  R. Gardner,et al.  The case for prepatterning in the mouse. , 2005, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[14]  Y. Nabeshima,et al.  Morphological Organization of the Mouse Preimplantation Embryo , 2009, Reproductive sciences.

[15]  A. Tarkowski,et al.  Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4- and 8-cell stage. , 1967, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[16]  François Nédélec,et al.  A self-organization framework for symmetry breaking in the mammalian embryo , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  Philipp J. Keller,et al.  Reconstruction of Zebrafish Early Embryonic Development by Scanned Light Sheet Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[18]  Janet Rossant,et al.  The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[19]  P. Lemaire,et al.  A Quantitative Approach to the Study of Cell Shapes and Interactions during Early Chordate Embryogenesis , 2006, Current Biology.

[20]  Janet Rossant,et al.  FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst , 2010, Development.

[21]  C. Ziomek,et al.  The foundation of two distinct cell lineages within the mouse morula , 1981, Cell.

[22]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo , 2007, Development.

[23]  I. Burtscher,et al.  Foxa2 regulates polarity and epithelialization in the endoderm germ layer of the mouse embryo , 2009, Development.

[24]  Philipp J. Keller,et al.  Quantitative high-speed imaging of entire developing embryos with simultaneous multiview light-sheet microscopy , 2012, Nature Methods.

[25]  S. Srinivas,et al.  Use of the viral 2A peptide for bicistronic expression in transgenic mice , 2008, BMC Biology.

[26]  Z. A. Deussen,et al.  Features of cell lineage in preimplantation mouse development. , 1978, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[27]  Alexander Jesacher,et al.  Characterisation of the dynamic behaviour of lipid droplets in the early mouse embryo using adaptive harmonic generation microscopy , 2010, BMC Cell Biology.

[28]  Kazuhiro Chida,et al.  Polarity-Dependent Distribution of Angiomotin Localizes Hippo Signaling in Preimplantation Embryos , 2013, Current Biology.

[29]  Sirio Dupont.  Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011 .

[30]  Y. Marikawa,et al.  Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryo , 2009, Molecular reproduction and development.

[31]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Blastocyst lineage formation, early embryonic asymmetries and axis patterning in the mouse , 2009, Development.

[32]  M. Surani,et al.  Interactions of blastomeres suggest changes in cell surface adhesiveness during the formation of inner cell mass and trophectoderm in the preimplantation mouse embryo. , 1982, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[33]  T. Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic processes in the development of pluripotency in vivo , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[34]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Cell and molecular regulation of the mouse blastocyst , 2006, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.