Assessment of the antireflection property of moth wings by three-dimensional transfer-matrix optical simulations.

The wings of the moth Cacostatia ossa (Ctenuchinae) are covered on both sides by non-close-packed nipple arrays which are known to act as broadband antireflection coatings. Experimental evaluation of the antireflection property of these biological structures is problematic because of the lack of a proper reference for reflectance measurements, i.e., a smooth surface made of the same material as the wing. Theoretical evaluation, on the other hand, is much more reliable provided that optical simulations are carried out on a realistic structural model of the wing. Based on detailed morphological characterizations, we established a three-dimensional (3D) model of the wing and used 3D transfer-matrix optical simulations in order to demonstrate the broadband antireflection property of the wings of Cacostatia ossa. Differences between hemispherical and specular reflectance spectra revealed that diffraction effects were not negligible for this structure although they did not jeopardize the antireflection efficiency. The influences of the backside corrugation and of the material's absorption on the reflectance spectrum were also studied. In addition, simulations based on an effective-medium model of the wing were carried out using a multilayer thin-film code. In comparison with the latter simulations, the 3D transfer-matrix simulations were found to be more accurate for evaluating the antireflection property.

[1]  Michael F Land,et al.  Optics of the ultraviolet reflecting scales of a jumping spider , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Wettability and Contaminability of Insect Wings as a Function of Their Surface Sculptures , 1996 .

[3]  A. Yoshida Antireflection of the Butterfly and Moth Wings through Microstructure , 2002 .

[4]  Zhongfan Liu,et al.  The fabrication of subwavelength anti-reflective nanostructures using a bio-template , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[5]  R. Wootton,et al.  Quantified interference and diffraction in single Morpho butterfly scales , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Jean Pol Vigneron,et al.  Variation of a photonic crystal color with the Miller indices of the exposed surface , 2006, SPIE OPTO.

[7]  Andrew R. Parker,et al.  Biomimetics of photonic nanostructures. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[8]  Lucas,et al.  Polaritons in semiconductor multilayered materials. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[9]  D. Stavenga,et al.  Light on the moth-eye corneal nipple array of butterflies , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Andrew R. Parker,et al.  Solar–absorber antireflector on the eye of an Eocene fly (45 Ma) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.