The Matthew effect for cohorts of economists
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. S. Katz,et al. The self-similar science system , 1999 .
[2] David Maddison. Increasing returns to information and the survival of broadway theatre productions , 2004 .
[3] Arthur De Vany,et al. THE MARKET FOR MOTION PICTURES: RANK, REVENUE, AND SURVIVAL , 1997 .
[4] H. Simon,et al. ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .
[5] Steve Pressé,et al. Nonuniversal power law scaling in the probability distribution of scientific citations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[6] Leo Egghe,et al. A characterization of the law of Lotka in terms of sampling , 2005, Scientometrics.
[7] L. Guidi,et al. Citation classics in periodontology: a controlled study. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[8] Ralph Kenna,et al. Normalization of peer-evaluation measures of group research quality across academic disciplines , 2011 .
[9] Derek de Solla Price,et al. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[10] D. Weakliem,et al. Sociological Stratification: Change and Continuity in the Distribution of Departmental Prestige, 1965–2007 , 2012 .
[11] Thomas Krichel,et al. The Economics of Open Bibliographic Data Provision , 2009 .
[12] Michael Strevens. The role of the Matthew effect in science , 2006 .
[13] M. Bothner,et al. When Do Matthew Effects Occur? , 2010 .
[14] Claudio Gandelli,et al. Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[15] Pat Bazeley,et al. Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applicants: what counts in a highly competitive context? , 1998 .
[16] Rui Jiang,et al. A unified framework for the pareto law and Matthew effect using scale-free networks , 2006, physics/0606085.
[17] N. Babchuk,et al. The Quest for Institutional Recognition: A Longitudinal Analysis of Scholarly Productivity and Academic Prestige among Sociology Departments , 1998 .
[18] Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al. Two-step competition process leads to quasi power-law income distributions , 2001 .
[19] Vincent Larivière,et al. Modeling a century of citation distributions , 2008, J. Informetrics.
[20] M. BONITZ,et al. Characteristics and impact of the matthew effect for countries , 1997, Scientometrics.
[21] Matjaz Perc,et al. Zipf's law and log-normal distributions in measures of scientific output across fields and institutions: 40 years of Slovenia's research as an example , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[22] R. Merton. The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.
[23] Lydia L. Lange,et al. Gaining scientific recognition by position: Does editorship increase citation rates? , 1999, Scientometrics.
[24] La production scientifique des enseignants - chercheurs en économie: Quelques résultats économétriques issus du dispositif PES , 2012 .
[25] S. Redner. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution , 1998, cond-mat/9804163.
[26] Grit Laudel,et al. The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds , 2006 .
[27] Christian Zimmermann,et al. Academic Rankings with RePEc , 2012 .
[28] Hendrik P. van Dalen,et al. What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers , 2001, Scientometrics.
[29] Marshall H. Medoff,et al. Evidence of a Harvard and Chicago Matthew Effect , 2006 .
[30] Frank Havemann,et al. Firm-like behavior of journals? Scaling properties of their output and impact growth dynamics , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[31] Manfred Bonitz. Ten years Matthew effect for countries , 2005, Scientometrics.
[32] Christian Seiler,et al. Ranking Economists on the Basis of Many Indicators: An Alternative Approach Using RePEc Data , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[33] James G. Hunt,et al. Content, Process, and the Matthew Effect Among Management Academics , 1987 .
[34] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Interpretations of Departures from the Pareto Curve Firm-Size Distributions , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.
[35] Richard S. J. Tol. The Matthew effect defined and tested for the 100 most prolific economists , 2009 .
[36] Andrea Scharnhorst,et al. The matthew index—Concentration patterns and Matthew core journals , 1999, Scientometrics.
[37] F. Veloso,et al. The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers , 2007 .
[38] B. Looy,et al. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .
[39] Rui Jiang,et al. Simulating the wealth distribution with a Richest-Following strategy on scale-free network , 2007 .
[40] Thomas Schøtt,et al. Ties between Center and Periphery in the Scientific World-System: Accumulation of Rewards, Dominance and Self-Reliance in the Center , 1998 .
[41] Nick Bontis,et al. The superstar phenomenon in the knowledge management and intellectual capital academic discipline , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[42] Arthur De Vany,et al. Motion picture profit, the stable Paretian hypothesis, and the curse of the superstar , 2004 .
[43] Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al. Competition amongst scientists for publication status:Toward a model of scientific publication and citation distributions , 2001, Scientometrics.
[44] Jeong‐Yoo Kim,et al. The Economics of Citation , 2007 .
[45] Santo Fortunato,et al. Characterizing and Modeling Citation Dynamics , 2011, PloS one.
[46] Cecelia M. Brown. The Matthew Effect of the Annual Reviews series and the flow of scientific communication through the World Wide Web , 2004, Scientometrics.
[47] Vwani P. Roychowdhury,et al. Stochastic modeling of citation slips , 2004, Scientometrics.