Can Cognitive Explanations Be Eliminated?

The purpose of article is to analyze the arguments of Bruno Latour and SteveWoolgar aimed at eliminating `superfluous' cognitive explanations from discussionof scientific activity. They proposed to a ten-year moratorium on cognitiveexplanations of scientific activity and promised to reassess explanation interms of cognition after this period of time if some aspects of scientific inquirywould not be accounted by sociological explanations. Intensive laboratory studiesof scientific practice indicated that scientific thinking is not based on mentalprocesses alone but relies on external tools and instruments. On the basis ofthese kinds of observations, they rejected all cognitive explanations of scientificinquiry. By building on sociocultural theories of cognition, the present study makesthe case that the use of conceptual tools significantly transforms cognitive processes.It is concluded that the failure to appreciate cognitive explanations reflects a far toonarrow and non-social concept of cognition: Even after the ten-year moratorium thereappears to be many good reasons to reassess the proposal of eliminating cognitiveexplanations altogether.

[1]  R. Rieber,et al.  The Instrumental Method in Psychology , 1997 .

[2]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[3]  Kai Hakkarainen,et al.  The Interrogative Model of Inquiry and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2002 .

[4]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor‐network theory as approaches to studying innovations , 1999 .

[5]  D. Bloor,et al.  Knowledge and Social Imagery , 1977 .

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[8]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[9]  James Liszka.  Peirce's New Rhetoric , 2000 .

[10]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reason, Truth and History. , 1985 .

[11]  P. Thagard,et al.  Computational Philosophy of Science , 1988 .

[12]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[13]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Representation, Cognition and Self: What Hope for an Integration of Psychology and Sociology? , 1989 .

[14]  J. Wertsch.  Mind as action , 1998 .

[15]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy , 2000 .

[16]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[17]  C. Bereiter.  Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse , 1994 .

[18]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[19]  P. Slezak.  Sociology of scientific knowledge and scientific education: Part I , 1994 .

[20]  M. Cole.  Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[21]  E. Eisenstein.  The printing press as an agent of change , 1969 .

[22]  J. Goody,et al.  The Consequences of Literacy , 1963, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[23]  M. Tomasello.  The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[24]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[25]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[26]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories , 1984 .

[27]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Science, the very idea , 1988 .

[28]  I. Niiniluoto.  Realism, relativism, and constructivism , 1991, Synthese.

[29]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise , 1993 .

[30]  P. Thagard,et al.  Scientific Cognition: Hot or Cold? , 1989 .

[31]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Outsmarting IQ: The Emerging Science of Learnable Intelligence , 1995 .

[32]  K. Dunbar.  HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[33]  Jack Goody,et al.  The interface between the written and the oral , 1989 .

[34]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[35]  J. Goody.  The Domestication of the Savage Mind , 1982 .

[36]  David R. Olson,et al.  The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading , 1996 .

[37]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[38]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[39]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[40]  J. Wertsch.  Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind , 1985 .

[41]  Maurice Bloch,et al.  How We Think They Think: Anthropological Approaches To Cognition, Memory, And Literacy , 1998 .

[42]  Y. Engeström.  Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[43]  Ian Hacking,et al.  The Participant Irrealist At Large in the Laboratory , 1988, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[44]  Peter Slezak,et al.  Sociology of scientific knowledge and science education part 2: Laboratory life under the microscope , 1994 .

[45]  W. Ong,et al.  Orality and literacy : the technologizing of the word , 1982 .